At 3.2% the spread has not been this low for a long time. At least I didn't notice it. Normal for ASX shares is around 5%.TLG up 20% in Frankfurt, that's more like it!!
There is plenty of Australian wine at the moment, we have about 2.8billion bottles worth in storage.A little patience until the fine drop is a little cooler. But we are extremely patient, aren't we?
I'm sorry to hear that! We all have our challenges or (massive) problems with China.There is plenty of Australian wine at the moment, we have about 2.8billion bottles worth in storage.
Australia’s oversupply of wine tops 2.8bn bottles in wake of China trade dispute
New report suggests glut will last years, even if Beijing drops tariffs early, while prices of Australian red wine grapes plummet by more than halfwww.theguardian.com
WoW - spread is at only 2.1%! I don't remember seeing it this low than in summer autumn 2020 when it started. Maybe a real tempting offer from the makers?At 3.2% the spread has not been this low for a long time. At least I didn't notice it. Normal for ASX shares is around 5%.
The makers are willing to make an offer. Volume is expected to increase? Lure bid (?).
Hi Cosors, putting my two bobs in here, as I didn’t want you to feel like we are all silent reading posts as if you are talking to yourself, or doing your head in. Your posts are invaluable. Reading 2026 I was a tad deflated, but I believe 2025 is a more the timeframe to produce anode to satisfy customer demands (& possible agreements which should eventuate very soon to o/t). TalSi plant; EVA plant; and partially completed new anode refinery (to produce the permitted 19.5k tpa) I believe can be achieved and what MT & the team will utilize plus have a few cards up their sleeve. CheersBut that's just my opinion. Everyone else here is silent except of Monkeymandan with a fear/hope about this. I can imagine that the panic is going on over at the other place.)
I remember that we had often wondered how this was/would going to work. And then we were informed about the implemented solution, sometimes only after it was already implemented and sometimes passively through a rare look behind the scenes before.
I suspect that this does not satisfy you. But that seems to be the way it is.
But that's just my opinion. Everyone else here is silent except of Monkeymandan with a fear/hope about this. I can imagine that the panic is going on over at the other place.)
I remember that we had often wondered how this was/would going to work. And then we were informed about the implemented solution, sometimes only after it was already implemented and sometimes passively through a rare look behind the scenes before.
I suspect that this does not satisfy you. But that seems to be the way it is.
I'm pretty sure I've seen somewhere that it was due to "start" production in late 2024 (early 2025). It's possible the ramping process won't complete until 2026 which will then be full production.I’ve been wrangling with this and 2026 completion just doesn’t add up. As you point out, 2024 has been communicated for the last year or two (late 24 most recently by Per-Erik), and they were placing orders for long lead time plant and machinery items months ago, so how could we leapfrog an entire year?
One can only think it’s one or more of the following at play:
I’m less perturbed by this than when I first read it. Ultimately I’m in Talga for Niska volume, and anything over that is a bonus. And Talnode Si is going to be the very large cherry on top imo.
- TLG taking the under promise and over deliver approach (for once), ie this has 6months contingency etc to allow for delays which are the norm in construction.
- This factors in the assumption a Supreme Court appeal is lodged and heard, so delaying finalisation of finance and thus cranking up construction. Once they’re on site for the main works they will be burning through tens of millions a month, so they simply can’t press ‘go’ on full mobilisation until funds are in the bank.
- This is the drop dead date for all construction to be completed (ie complete flowsheet), and doesn’t take account of the fact some parts of the process could possibly be outsourced as Cosors has said.
- Typo - unlikely imo.
While it will be great to see revenue in 2025, if it’s early 26 then so be it. The important thing to me now is to see a robust and smart Niska+ expansion plan and the roadmap for it. I know some have lost faith in the permitting process, but I’m confident once the the various EU Acts have been enacted and our project has been listed as of Strategic Importance (surely this is a certainty?), things for the expansion phase will look very different to the past 5 years. I’ll stick my neck out and guess we will be producing at ramped volume from 28/29.
Purely my opinion, but I’m optimistic.
The EIB is only one of the financing partners. A large part comes from the others. And if I understand it correctly, the EIB is waiting to see what comes from the others in order to close a possible gap.I'm pretty sure I've seen somewhere that it was due to "start" production in late 2024 (early 2025). It's possible the ramping process won't complete until 2026 which will then be full production.
Maybe it also has to do with funding. They purchase a few lines to begin with, and use those to fund the remaining lines to get to full production. EIB funding went from €300 -> €150, maybe that wasn't expected and there's a shortfall. I know Mark says it's because the tranches they give everyone made more sense, but i feel like not for us and it wasn't our decision. I imagine the EIB would give the cheapest funding (lowest interest rate) given they encourage projects like ours and do so much due diligence, why would you choose to take less funding from it? Delaying the final completion of the factory would be one way to deal with a shortfall.
You absolutely jinxed HC with your opening statement about pabs or whoever is behind those Aliases.When Pabs is not active with his countless alter egos, the other place is currently quite civilized. The timing update of the newsletter has been discussed there, but not used for down-ramping at all.
In the middle of 2021, Talga communicated that they were expecting the permits in the course of 2022, that they intend to produce around 19,000 tons in 2023 and that they would like to increase this to over 100,000 tons from 2025 onwards; unfortunately, they now seem to be quite a way away from this. As I said, first and foremost, I don't understand why Talga didn't take the opportunity to neatly lay out this development in the webinar, and instead just dropped it in a side note the day after. But they will have had their reasons for doing so, and hopefully we'll have clarity by the next webinar at the latest.
I appreciate that you took the time to share your perspective.
I contacted Talga regarding the "goal of completion in 2026". Here's their brief statement:Let's hope that Mark will make a firework of announcements in the next 6 months that will finally bring the share price to a new all-time high. However, the newsletter's announcement that the company plans to be in production by 2026 sows seeds of doubt. Has anyone asked them if this might be a typo? If it's not a typo, then I don't understand why you would communicate it in a side sentence in a newsletter instead of communicating that openly and cleanly in a previous day webinar.
View attachment 43883
Thank you for highlighting the error in the local Swedish newsletter. We are aware that incorrect information was included, and the team have taken steps to address this.
Please accept our apologies for the confusion. Development timelines are communicated to the market via the ASX.
Thank you for your initiative!I contacted Talga regarding the "goal of completion in 2026". Here's their brief statement: