My assertion is that as it stands Vittangi won't get funded.
The DFS was based on anode sale price of US$12,312/t for a pre-tax NPV of US$1,054MM
View attachment 66295
If you look at the project sensitivities, a 25% drop in Tal-C price (US$9,384/t) gives a PRE-TAX NPV of about US$500M
View attachment 66296
As it stands US$9,000/t is very optimistic. $6,000-8,000/t (maybe).
So Vittangi
post-tax NPV (which is what matters) is probably currently in the region of US$300MM. Capex is more than 2X that at around US$650MM
Projects with CAPEX > NPV typically don't get funded. Too much risk on the investment for the reward. Projects with CAPEX > 2X NPV absolutely do not get funded.
Find me one example in the 1000s of asx explorers and developers that have made it to producers where their initial project capex was 2X or more the NPV. ONE example and I will go away forever.
Vittangi will not get funded as it stands. How's that for a negative assertion?