TLG Discussion 2022

ignore me
That's the only sensible thing you have posted since last November

Thanks for the tip

What Ever GIF by Newcastle University
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 2 users
Probably just a temporary bounce when our permit saga end in our favour?
LOL! hard to take much seriously after that.

Then there's some rubbish about the low price of anode and the implication the broker reports are fudging the numbers to the upside, and should use a more "realistic" 8k.

Well....
View attachment 66283

Yeah that's Niska. Now do Vittangi
 
View attachment 66284
Sorry what graveyard?
(latest investor webinar)

I'm willing to bet there will never be a material sale of Talcoat or Talcrete. It's dead and they just haven't let go yet. At least they appear to have let go of Talnode-X and Taldnode-e or are you just gonna ignore those?
 
I'm willing to bet there will never be a material sale of Talcoat or Talcrete. It's dead and they just haven't let go yet. At least they appear to have let go of Talnode-X and Taldnode-e or are you just gonna ignore those?
OK EVERYONE LET'S JUST IGNORE THE TROLL
AS SOON AS YOU DEMOLISH EACH ARGUMENT HE RUNS DOWN YET ANOTHER RABBIT HOLE

IT IS A TROLL

IGNORE IT
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 7 users
I see we’ve reached the “troll” and “downramper” phase of denial.

Anyone gonna actually answer what’s happened to Talnode-X or Talnode-e? Is nobody concerned that things like this and ship coatings and the whole graphene business never actually goes anywhere? It’s all talk.
 

cosors

👀
Some honey
This page goes on and on with all the links or the upcoming events. Too much to post. A good pastime and outlook.
I find the collaboration with Japan and Korea interesting.
IPCEI is the abbreviation of „Important Project of Common European Interest“.

"Issue 02/2024 | Building an Integrated European Battery Ecosystem
July 4, 2024

Editorial​

Welcome battery enthusiasts!
The landscape of the global battery market is currently undergoing a period of upheaval in which Europe - against all odds - is making great efforts to establish itself as a major player. The European battery ecosystem has been identified as critical to the region's industrial policy strategy and its transition to a low-carbon economy.
In recent years, the European Commission, the European Investment Bank, Member States and industry stakeholders have joined forces to strengthen European competitiveness. The aim of this initiative is to create a vital, sustainable and innovative battery ecosystem in Europe. The alliance has been a catalyst for the emergence of an EU ecosystem comprising over 260 industry and innovation players covering the entire battery value chain.
Despite this progress, challenges remain. The European battery market is still in its early stages compared to the Asian markets, which dominate with a share of 85%. To close this gap, Europe is focussing on building a battery industry that is not only competitive but also complies with sustainability and ethical production standards.
Looking to the future, the IPCEI's role in the battery industry is not just about meeting immediate requirements. It is about setting a precedent for innovation, sustainability and collaboration that will shape the future of energy storage and mobility. The continued expansion of the European battery ecosystem, the strategic focus on sustainability and the collaborative spirit of the IPCEI are paving the way for a brighter, greener future.
So there is still a lot to do, and above all it is about joining forces and acting together today and tomorrow to overcome hurdles. The path is pointing towards a robust and sustainable battery industry that will play a central role in Europe's economic and environmental future. The journey is well underway and Europe is leading the it with determination and ingenuity.
Enjoy our colourful bouquet of information and let's stay together in the second half of the year and beyond.
Uwe Seidel and Stefan Wolf
Programme Management IPCEI Battery, VDI/VDE-IT

Content​


If that's not enough:

PDFs with Talga mentioned, of course:
2024
BATTERY CELL PRODUCTION IN EUROPE: STATUS QUO AND OUTLOOK

2023

Mechanical and plant engineering: A strategic component of the European battery ecosystem Cooperation as a key to success?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users

Diogenese

Top 20
Some honey
This page goes on and on with all the links or the upcoming events. Too much to post. A good pastime and outlook.
I find the collaboration with Japan and Korea interesting.
IPCEI is the abbreviation of „Important Project of Common European Interest“.

"Issue 02/2024 | Building an Integrated European Battery Ecosystem
July 4, 2024

Editorial​

Welcome battery enthusiasts!
The landscape of the global battery market is currently undergoing a period of upheaval in which Europe - against all odds - is making great efforts to establish itself as a major player. The European battery ecosystem has been identified as critical to the region's industrial policy strategy and its transition to a low-carbon economy.
In recent years, the European Commission, the European Investment Bank, Member States and industry stakeholders have joined forces to strengthen European competitiveness. The aim of this initiative is to create a vital, sustainable and innovative battery ecosystem in Europe. The alliance has been a catalyst for the emergence of an EU ecosystem comprising over 260 industry and innovation players covering the entire battery value chain.
Despite this progress, challenges remain. The European battery market is still in its early stages compared to the Asian markets, which dominate with a share of 85%. To close this gap, Europe is focussing on building a battery industry that is not only competitive but also complies with sustainability and ethical production standards.
Looking to the future, the IPCEI's role in the battery industry is not just about meeting immediate requirements. It is about setting a precedent for innovation, sustainability and collaboration that will shape the future of energy storage and mobility. The continued expansion of the European battery ecosystem, the strategic focus on sustainability and the collaborative spirit of the IPCEI are paving the way for a brighter, greener future.
So there is still a lot to do, and above all it is about joining forces and acting together today and tomorrow to overcome hurdles. The path is pointing towards a robust and sustainable battery industry that will play a central role in Europe's economic and environmental future. The journey is well underway and Europe is leading the it with determination and ingenuity.
Enjoy our colourful bouquet of information and let's stay together in the second half of the year and beyond.
Uwe Seidel and Stefan Wolf
Programme Management IPCEI Battery, VDI/VDE-IT

Content​


If that's not enough:

PDFs with Talga mentioned, of course:
2024
BATTERY CELL PRODUCTION IN EUROPE: STATUS QUO AND OUTLOOK

2023

Mechanical and plant engineering: A strategic component of the European battery ecosystem Cooperation as a key to success?
Is Stefan Wolf the brainchild of Hernann Hesse?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 2 users
I see we’ve reached the “troll” and “downramper” phase of denial.

Anyone gonna actually answer what’s happened to Talnode-X or Talnode-e? Is nobody concerned that things like this and ship coatings and the whole graphene business never actually goes anywhere? It’s all talk.
PEEPS

DONT ANSWER THE TROLL
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

JNRB

Regular
Nope sorry onus is on you now to actually provide the numbers you've used for your negative assertion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
fellas is it trolling to ask why some of the companies products have disappeared from the website?
 
Nope sorry onus is on you now to actually provide the numbers you've used for your negative assertion.

My assertion is that as it stands Vittangi won't get funded.

The DFS was based on anode sale price of US$12,312/t for a pre-tax NPV of US$1,054MM


IMG_4327.jpg



If you look at the project sensitivities, a 25% drop in Tal-C price (US$9,384/t) gives a PRE-TAX NPV of about US$500M


IMG_4326.jpg


As it stands US$9,000/t is very optimistic. $6,000-8,000/t (maybe).

So Vittangi post-tax NPV (which is what matters) is probably currently in the region of US$300MM. Capex is more than 2X that at around US$650MM

Projects with CAPEX > NPV typically don't get funded. Too much risk on the investment for the reward. Projects with CAPEX > 2X NPV absolutely do not get funded.

Find me one example in the 1000s of asx explorers and developers that have made it to producers where their initial project capex was 2X or more the NPV. ONE example and I will go away forever.

Vittangi will not get funded as it stands. How's that for a negative assertion?
 

BlackBeak

Regular
I see we’ve reached the “troll” and “downramper” phase of denial.

Anyone gonna actually answer what’s happened to Talnode-X or Talnode-e? Is nobody concerned that things like this and ship coatings and the whole graphene business never actually goes anywhere? It’s all talk.
I'll bite.

We don't have a factory to produce graphene. We have a lab producing samples. And we're not spending money on building a dedicated graphene plant because while there are play projects, there's no real demand to support a business from what I've seen. Go take a look at First Graphene, they went down that path.

My understanding is we were going to rely on leftovers and waste from the Niska expansion to make graphene, and given Sweden has sat on whether to even listen to the appeal for phase 1 for almost an entire year, I doubt we're seeing phase 2 in production the next year or 2, and therefore no graphene to sell.

Am I worried? No. I'm not sure why you're expecting sales and contracts or loud announcements for it anytime soon? They've stated in webinars that these projects still exist but aren't a priority, and I can understand why and agree with that logic. Ask me again in a few years time once we are building phase 2 and still have no contracts for graphene.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 9 users

cosors

👀
Is Stefan Wolf the brainchild of Hernann Hesse?
1720604689643.jpeg


_____________
The IPCEI is supported by the German GmbH VDI/VDE-IT, whose shareholders are the Association of German Engineers (VDI) and the Association for Electrical, Electronic & Information Technologies (VDE). The VDI and VDE are the remaining pride of Germany from an engineering perspective. They also contribute to norms and standards. That's why some authors or speakers in videos on this page are typically German.) I had to smile at the pronunciation.

Here is another detail to smile about:
Hermann is a classic German male first name. The name is composed of the Old High German words "heri" for "army" and "man" for "man". Hermann therefore means something like "soldier", "warrior" or "fighter". The spelling "Herrmann" is also quite common.

In Germany, the figure of Hermann the Cheruscan, based on Arminius as a historical person, became a national myth and symbolic figure from the second half of the 18th century and part of the German founding myth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users

JNRB

Regular
My assertion is that as it stands Vittangi won't get funded.

The DFS was based on anode sale price of US$12,312/t for a pre-tax NPV of US$1,054MM


View attachment 66295


If you look at the project sensitivities, a 25% drop in Tal-C price (US$9,384/t) gives a PRE-TAX NPV of about US$500M


View attachment 66296

As it stands US$9,000/t is very optimistic. $6,000-8,000/t (maybe).

So Vittangi post-tax NPV (which is what matters) is probably currently in the region of US$300MM. Capex is more than 2X that at around US$650MM

Projects with CAPEX > NPV typically don't get funded. Too much risk on the investment for the reward. Projects with CAPEX > 2X NPV absolutely do not get funded.

Find me one example in the 1000s of asx explorers and developers that have made it to producers where their initial project capex was 2X or more the NPV. ONE example and I will go away forever.

Vittangi will not get funded as it stands. How's that for a negative assertion?

Ooooh you got so close to your first actual point! It's an assertion, but still unfounded and un-evidenced.
So now the NPV is the issue, rather than market cap? Pick a point and think it out properly.

... and why are you comparing Talga to a miner rather than a specialised industrial product manufacturer?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

JNRB

Regular
OK sorry guys I'll stop baiting the troll was just a little bored this afternoon
( and he makes it so easy!)
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Ooooh you got so close to your first actual point! It's an assertion, but still unfounded and un-evidenced.
So now the NPV is the issue, rather than market cap? Pick a point and think it out properly.

... and why are you comparing Talga to a miner rather than a specialised industrial product manufacturer?

The project NPV, capex and company market cap are all interrelated when analyzing the project viability for reasons that should be obvious.

I compared with other miners to be generous, because mining projects are typically lower risk than a combined mining + specialized industrial product project for reasons that should be obvious

You seem to think you did a thing here but just showed up how out of your depth you are and don’t even realise it
 
OK sorry guys I'll stop baiting the troll was just a little bored this afternoon
( and he makes it so easy!)
Yeah........................how many times has he said he is hanging around to pick up cheap shares in the next CR so he can re-invest into a dead beat company with projects that wont get funding.

He's a troll.................................do we know what Pabs calls himself these days ?

Only asking as the posts have the hallmarks of a vindictive moron
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 7 users
Project won't get funded as it stands correct. It's dead for now but a change in circumstances would make it investible again. It needs either global anode pricing to rise rapidly (seems unlikely in the mid-term) or commitment from EU battery cos to pay above market rate for their anode (no sign anyone is willing to do that).

But it's not about buying when it's cheap. I'd buy at $1+ if the conditions were better and the risks weren't as high.

Anyway looks like that 55c support will fall today, after that there is no floor. Easily could go under 40c.
 

JoMo68

Regular
Yeah........................how many times has he said he is hanging around to pick up cheap shares in the next CR so he can re-invest into a dead beat company with projects that wont get funding.

He's a troll.................................do we know what Pabs calls himself these days ?

Only asking as the posts have the hallmarks of a vindictive moron
I had wondered the same thing myself...
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 3 users
$0.55 GONE

MT margin call next
 
Top Bottom