The DRC doesnt have a way to take AVZ out of manono given we have done the hard work and invested the money to bring this to life.
The DRC is very much in bed with the USA and we know the international committe wont stand for AVZ to be ripped off having invested our money into the project. We cannot be taken out of the project for a lack of progress when what we are waiting for is a license from the government.
So these announcements for me is part of the process of making changes and demonstrates progress whether it be in our favour or against us; thats positive we are seeing progress.
The only question you have to ask is; is it in our favour or against us?
Nothing to believe we are not in the driving seat
Could the cancelling of mining decree be in order to issue the full mining decree? Or perhaps its cancelling what was a corrupt deal?
Irresepective, we wait and see - I just wouldnt conclude this is bad news until you know otherwise.
Posters will tell you its bad, thats all there is left in hotcrapper - dont get shaken
I am however annoyed AVZ waited a week to announce this; thats a joke given it was done jan 28th... There is a disclosure issue here..
Im not so sure mate,Reads to me like we're seriously fucked.
A post from sf120 (who I regard as an astute investor) on the crapper. Makes sense. Could not be doom and gloom
sf120
1,949 Posts.
1,578
Date:06/02/23Time:10:32:48Post #:66088878
New
"I see this in very simple terms . A decision on the ML will be made in the coming days / weeks by Felix's actions . At that point if the right changes haven't been made then the ML is lost . It is not ambiguous . We don't need to wait for a Yes ML or No ML . This is the moment SH tell Nigel to pull the rip cord and get us the f--k out of there . We are getting close to the moment where this either starts or finishes . IMO"Well that's not good news.... Time to go into fight mode
I think there is fairly clear warning of what is likely to come in the last section of the announcement it isn't in any way alluding to what you've stated above:Im not so sure mate,
The original decree needed to be undone (it split the tenement)
The second decree also needed to be undone (it gave the go ahead for the southern part)
What we now need is a 3rd decree awarding the entirety of 13359..
The first part of the announcement alludes to exactly this, but the second part is ambiguous at best...
GLTAH
Powerage.
My concerns exactly,Looks like DRC acted without discussions with AVZ. Got to say it's disturbing.
Based on the announcement.
1) legal advice sought
2) needing to ascertain intent of DRC gov
Anyone who says it needs to happen may be correct but if it needs to happen you'd think there was discussion and communication with AVZ.
Track record of DRC isn't good.