Carlos Danger
Top 20
Yeah there are definitely mixed messages about this. On one hand management are saying that we just need the surface rights calculated and we're good to go. Which would mean RD as PE and CDL as PR or possibly gone as they are 'not fussed about the northern section'.Is the ML available for Roche Dure if we accept ? Forget all the BS that's going on . Forget Nth CDL . Forget the 15% ROFR . At the very least do we have Roche Dure ? Because I'm getting mixed messages . On the one hand management tells us we've been sliced and diced and surface fees have only been issued for Roche Dure & Sth CDL and we are not accepting that . This obviously tells us ML available excluding our rights to Nth CDL . On the other hand I was told directly from head office that the ML is completely out of our control . Now how is it completely out of our control if they have told us the surface rights can be calculated for Roche Dure . Does this not mean the ML is available if we accept the slice and dice ?
On the other hand they are saying that they are fighting for the northern section against AJN. I personally can't see anything happening until this 'dispute' has been resolved or Mupande is removed as DG of CAMI.
From the AGM:
What happened after ML Decree, spurious yet we’re in suspension. What’s the main issue for ML – is it Dathomir, is Zijin ICC arbitration 15, dispute with exploration rights?
A: Lot of players in vogue here in country, lot of hatchet jobs being done – President had a bad view from being ill advised by detractors (e.g. we hadn’t done anything, didn’t have money experience, and were speculators). Detractors continuing, but slowly slowly we’re working to remove the blocks.
We knew Chinese would have a crack, but we did not expect parts of DRC government to be in on it?
A: Nor did we - “we thought it was gambit by Chinese groups to get project cheapest way. We weren’t aware it was also elements of the government complicit. We can’t go into it, but rest assured those people are being turned over within meetings with real information is being shared, and people put on the spot.
Collusion between all those 3 – namely Zijin, Jin Cheng, CAMI?
A: That would be astute thought
Issue that a portion of mines directorate said we hadn’t done the work on the northern tenement area, and shouldn’t get the north?
A: That’s not within the mining code. So 13359 should be retained in its entirety – however the northern area may need to come under a separate exploration tenement, even though that’s not the established process. – We know who’s behind this (e.g. DG CAMI)
What about AJN having a crack
A: “their premise is that we’ve returned the northern tenement to government. We haven’t. Draw a conclusion out of that”.
Interview NF mentioned once mentioned once decree issued 10 day period before Court could issue the licence. What happened?
A: This was a misunderstanding. As soon as your documentation was in order and issued, this talk of periods was regarding the ministerial decree. Other steps in way of ML – CAMI have held up the invoicing, illegally in our view.