If I thought permits would be refused, I would have sold before now.
Of course there is a chance that there will be no permits, but, without me knowing the ins and outs of the Sami arguments, Talga has made substantial concessions.
As I understand it, the mine will be, at worst, an inconvenience, providing an obstacle around which the reindeer will need to detour, and there is the risk of reindeer being killed by trucks.
I do not know if there will be any loss of grazing land, but this will be remediated as the graphite is removed.
The EU has indicated strong support for critical minerals.
So the assessors have to weigh the Sami rights and concerns on the one hand against Talga's concessions, the climate, the economic benefits, and strategic benefits.
... and remember, as
@beserk pointed out, traditionally reindeer were used to haul ore from the mines (in the winter?), a fact which is commemorated each year by a ski race. Customs are not immutable. Quad bikes and skidoos are commonly used for leisure and herding.
So is the detour of a few kilometers to outweigh the possibility of producing zero CO2 batteries?
So my guess is that the permits will be granted.
If I'm wrong, then we are left with our anode IP (and a couple of side gigs), which we could license, but the licencee would need a supply of graphene which we sweep up off the floor in refining our graphite.