Perhaps this explains why the shorts went down before.
It is not just the SC. It is only representative. The SC only reacts when, as in this case, irresponsible egoists ensure that climate change is secondary to their individual interests.
"PO Sandström believes that the mining plans will not materialise: "I am sure the mineral will be needed."
Krafiittikaivoksen plaanit Vittangissa oon herättänheet paljon vastustusta Vittangissa. Sijainti Tornionväylän vieressä herättää huolia siittä, mitä tapahtuu ...
sverigesradio.se
Heil climate!
ad
"The river brought Henrik Mickelsson Kyrö to what became Vittangi 350 years ago. ‘The river is everything,’ says Håkan Lundström, who sees risks with a mine next to the river. But there is great value in the minerals and there is great pressure for them to be extracted: ‘The mine will happen’, says P-O Sandström about the minerals, which have been described as a national interest.
Here is the full report, in Meänkieli:"
seems to be positive:
View attachment 69012
Log in to Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family and people you know.
www.facebook.com
From our Anti Group. Two different statements. There is probably no translation error, as I have translated it several times in different ways. So a mistake by the journalists? Doesn't matter either.
damn, that hurts! that SC decision cannot come fast enough. This is rough for him personally, but it also appears to shape up to a pretty big injustice as this case simply needs a decision! Can Talga seek damages from the swedish state for this endless delay?
