My thinking is the court has to care to the fact that NG is in short supply. It very much ties in with the SGU's stamping of Vittangi being of national interest. I don't think it would get such status if NG was plentiful (such as iron ore). Under the enviro laws such a deposit deserves preference when competing interests (aka reindeer) arise (we all know this).I don't think the Court cares about whether a mineral is in short supply or not. That might later play into future legislation being enacted down the track by the Swedish government which is probably another 2 years away if it is necessary in the event of permit denial.
In my experience they will apply the environmental law as they see fit but also take into consideration any concessions TLG will make to reduce environmental impact i.e. 6 months on mining per year.
Plus I believe the Court will also look at TLG's track record as don't forget they do have a trial mining licence that has been in production for what ?......is it 2 years. I hope we have ben model citizens as far as the trial mine is concerned.
I take some comfort in the fact that we have not heard any complaints re the trial mine plus our concession to mine only 6 months each year with restoration ongoing.
Also the fact that Euroz Hartley changed TLG's status from "Speculative Buy" to "Buy" tells me that the information on the ground in Sweden is probably much more positive that what our own nightmares are churning out on these pages.
I wish you all the best with the release even if I do not dare to ask why or what you mean.My thinking is the court has to care to the fact that NG is in short supply. It very much ties in with the SGU's stamping of Vittangi being of national interest. I don't think it would get such status if NG was plentiful (such as iron ore). Under the enviro laws such a deposit deserves preference when competing interests (aka reindeer) arise (we all know this).
Good point re the trial mine! I often forget we have had this successfully operating (to our knowledge) now for years and recently rehabilitated. I'm very much a layman on the mining side but wonder just how far a leap it is from our 25k trial mine to the 100k we're chasing. And surely they wouldn't have green lighted the trial mine back then had it not been likely a full permit could be granted. And of course there's been a lot of positives between then and now to further strengthen a green light.
Clearly we've convinced ourselves!
As much as I love Euroz and their Buy rec, the fact they now underwrite our CR's I feel it doesn't pack much punch. They do however seem to "get it" which is such a nice change. Many still refer to Talga Resources which is painful.
I'm bored in my cell awaiting the wardens release next Thursday.
Cheers.
OK so here is the answer on Page 11 of the new presentation.......OK guys and gals were we not supposed to get a refinery clearance by 24 March ?..................last Friday
From page 15 of the Euroz-Hartley presentation................
Building permits for refinery granted, with
decision to come into force 24 March 2023
(pending any appeals)
Now I do recall the "preference".................how did I forget that ?My thinking is the court has to care to the fact that NG is in short supply. It very much ties in with the SGU's stamping of Vittangi being of national interest. I don't think it would get such status if NG was plentiful (such as iron ore). Under the enviro laws such a deposit deserves preference when competing interests (aka reindeer) arise (we all know this).
Here's my English translation @cosors ! Happy reading (late here...)I think it's time for this and our drillers here who still have puff unlike me:
https://www.regeringen.se/contentas...earbetningskoncession-enligt-minerallagen.pdf
Of course, Talga is mentioned. It's with us about the simultaneous submission of applications.)
Maybe @Manual will help me tired old man again for you
Thank you! As you can see over in the Permits thread I'm also slowly learning thanks to you. This document is more for the TH and basic understanding of how the permit process works with this special dealing of applications in parallel.Here's my English translation @cosors ! Happy reading (late here...)
Volume for the 30th on ASX was 1,136,778 shares.Can any of you tell me what the volume was on the ASX on the 30th for you yesterday (maybe looking before opening) and then again tomorrow at close of trading? I am interested in the comparison and how much moves with you just.
Hi Gero and thanks! So what was the volume today Friday?Volume for the 30th on ASX was 1,136,778 shares.
Gday Cosors, volume was 2.367mHi Gero and thanks! So what was the volume today Friday?
Hi Cosors, I view the activity throughout the day (constantly ) via CommSec, which may not be available with you being in Europe. However, this provides a summary (I believe at end of day it would summarize similar to what I have available)…Can anyone recommend a page where I can see the buy and sell and the blocks that were traded on the ASX today?
It does not give a high level detail though, but does provide total volume number.Can anyone recommend a page where I can see the buy and sell and the blocks that were traded on the ASX today?
Interesting you might ask. I was stunned by the bots trading between 1 and 12 shares today. From memory there were 2200 trades like that out of around 4400 trades in totalCan anyone recommend a page where I can see the buy and sell and the blocks that were traded on the ASX today?