cosors
👀
Now even those who were strictly against us are moving to our side. I think whoever is elected is now in favour of new mines. It's just stupid that no one asks who was responsible for this in the first place. But no matter, the main thing is that the awareness comes. I don't want to say that it makes me happy but more confident
"New mines are important for Sweden's climate change, write several representatives of the Green Party in Di Debatt. A step in the right direction is a revision of the environmental permit processes.
Aah, sorry... I mean ==> Green Party
The authors of the debate write that the party's relationship with mines has been ambivalent, with discussion of increased production or new mines always being met with resistance. This view must be changed, they write.
"If we are serious about the transition, and not least if we are to improve the living standards of people around the world, we will need mines."
The party is now listening to industry body Svemin's need for more efficient environmental permitting processes. Unless Sweden revises these processes, Sweden, like other rich industrialised countries, will not be ready for a zero emissions energy transition as early as 2035 to meet the commitments of the Paris Agreement.
"No fossil-free mine or steel manufacturer will even have an environmental permit in place in Sweden by then," they warn."
https://www.tn.se/opinion-och-debatt/debatt-snabbare-klimatomstallning-kraver-nya-gruvor/
I took the liberty of correcting Swemin to Svemin.
I thank the hard and relentless work of Svemin and especially Mrs Suner. She has managed to convince even these hardliners!
A great feature to spoil the writing. I just had to try it out.
"New mines are important for Sweden's climate change, write several representatives of the Green Party in Di Debatt. A step in the right direction is a revision of the environmental permit processes.
Aah, sorry... I mean ==> Green Party
The authors of the debate write that the party's relationship with mines has been ambivalent, with discussion of increased production or new mines always being met with resistance. This view must be changed, they write.
"If we are serious about the transition, and not least if we are to improve the living standards of people around the world, we will need mines."
The party is now listening to industry body Svemin's need for more efficient environmental permitting processes. Unless Sweden revises these processes, Sweden, like other rich industrialised countries, will not be ready for a zero emissions energy transition as early as 2035 to meet the commitments of the Paris Agreement.
"No fossil-free mine or steel manufacturer will even have an environmental permit in place in Sweden by then," they warn."
https://www.tn.se/opinion-och-debatt/debatt-snabbare-klimatomstallning-kraver-nya-gruvor/
I took the liberty of correcting Swemin to Svemin.
I thank the hard and relentless work of Svemin and especially Mrs Suner. She has managed to convince even these hardliners!
A great feature to spoil the writing. I just had to try it out.
Last edited: