Hi Semmel,I have the feeling, the current runup is at least partly related to the expected binding offtake with ACC. I read the Announcement again and there is one sentence that I dont quite understand its meaning.
Ok, what exactly does this mean if anything? If they make a non-binding contract, but have a "legally binding obligation" to sign a binding offtake by end of this month, how is this not already a binding offtake? Why the snake-around? Or does this only apply to the DD part? In which case, how to you legally force someone to make an honest investigation? I am a bit confused.
Before they sign the binding offtake, they must use "normal" (commercially reasonable) efforts to complete due diligence. Of course, if the DD is unsatisfactory, the deal is off.