Do you mean the problem with the climate deniers, self-proclaimed climate saviours and the decision in spring? I have no doubts about the spring. Don't forget, no one has ever travelled as fast as Talga in Sweden - as far as I know. I got a little carried away with your all excitement.OK so they are still engaged and the lawyers are drawing up documentation and making amendments to same which is expected to be completed "shortly" but in this World nothing is guaranteed.
That "no guarantee" bit to me presents as there is a problem.
If they like the SPG and our "secret sauce" then the problem is perhaps around how the "floating price" is calculated ?
"Talga and ACC expect to finalise negotiations and definitive documentation shortly, noting there can be no guarantee the documentation will be finalised, and the Company will provide an update to the market accordingly."
Hang on.....................are they saying negotiations are pretty much finalised but....... who knows whether the lawyers will get their shit together in a short amount of time i.e. shortly
Any guess is as good as any other but I think it is a positive announcement overall
But I gotta wonder if for the Company Secretary of TLG whether English is his first language
Sure, I agree with your point, but it is also used to raise 'false' expectations at the other side of the negotiation table. I was wondering why the publication of the apparent advanced state of the negotiations was made and which party has suggested it.
I hear you but I learnt long ago to only set deadlines where you are in 100% control of the workflow to get to the deadline and if the deadline is missed............ blame someone else.
This is absurd. Last year 78% of the wind turbines in Sweden were not built because the applications were successfully rejected. A large proportion of the Sami fear environmental colonialism and justify their stance against wind turbines with the destruction of their reindeer grazing grounds and culture. Other wind turbines were probably prevented, as in our country, because of the famous red kite (? Rotmilan) and on the grounds of nature conservation. Of course, there are also NIMBYs. Greta works with the Sami as she did with Kallak. They agree that the environment must be protected. Mines harm the environment regardless of what they are used for. As the FI party openly admits, they are simply ideologically against it. However. Most environmental protection measures cannot be implemented because of environmental lawsuits. And because they block successfully they can go on complaining that nothing is happening and too much has been blocked. The EU is already in the process of rethinking its policy, because too much is blocked that is necessary for environmental protection, and this by means of laws that were made for environmental protection. This is not only absurd what Greta is doing, but also very ignorant and twisted. It is similar here. The environmental groups are a way of suing professional companies. Here, over 70% of wind power projects are prevented because of environmental lawsuits. Of course it's not just Gretas or environmental groups that sue. These laws are also instrumentalised by others. Therefore the EU sees a need for action to put a stop to the professional plaintiffs. A well-known example is the Natura2000 legislation which is also used against environmental projects. I don't know why I am repeating myself here. Maybe I just can't understand the blind actionism. Why doesn't Grata sue Scandinavia's largest environmental association for suing wind turbines and why doesn't she sue the Sami at the same time? I don't understand the protesters. It's not like conservative right-wing old farts are blocking these projects to hurt the environmentalists. Pretty twisted, I know. Actually, they should sue themselves. Even if Greta is often one of the reasonable ones. But she still goes crazy sometimes. Who will be sued next? Seriously, and they wonder why it takes 14 years to lay a power cable for green electricity or 6-7 years for a wind turbine here in Germany. Therefore, laws should be adapted so that environmental protection associations can no longer sue so successfully. They make up the largest part. But who am I telling here? We all know who is slowing down and has slowed down everything here. The Green Party, the Environmental Protection Association, the Sami and of course the Feminist PartyLOL
But who will save the children...oh...........Greta..............LOL
Greta Thunberg to sue Sweden over ‘climate inactivism’
Greta Thunberg joined hundreds of other plaintiffs in a lawsuit against the Swedish government, alleging inaction from the country.
Climate activist Greta Thunberg joined hundreds of other young plaintiffs in a lawsuit against the government of Sweden alleging inaction from the country on the issue of climate change.
The lawsuit joins Thunberg, 19, with more than 600 others who claim that Sweden’s climate policies have violated the Constitution along with the European Convention on Human Rights, Bloombergreported.
“The Swedish state fails to meet the constitutional requirement to promote sustainable development leading to a good environment for present and future generations,” the group organising the lawsuit said in a statement, according to Fox News.
Greta Thunberg to sue the Swedish government. Picture: Christopher Furlong/Getty Images
Thunberg posted on Twitter saying that Black Friday was the “perfect day” to sue the state over “its insufficient climate policies.”
“Today on Black Friday is the perfect day to sue the state over its insufficient climate policies. So that’s what we did,” Thunberg, one of the world’s most recognisable climate activists, said.
“See you in court,” she added.
Sweden’s parliament decided in 2017 that by 2045, the Scandinavian country will have zero net emissions of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere and will have 100 per cent renewable energy.
Still, activists in Sweden say the country should do more.
“The Swedish state has never treated the climate crisis as the crisis it is, and the new government has clearly signalled that it won’t do that either,” Anton Foley, a 20 year-old plaintiff in the case, said in a statement.
Climate campaigners have launched numerous lawsuits against governments and companies in recent years, with mixed success.
In one of the most high-profile cases, Germany’s top court ruled last year that the government had to adjust its climate targets to avoid unduly burdening the young.
The German government reacted by bringing forward its target for “net zero” emissions by five years to 2045 and laying more ambitious near-and-medium term steps to achieve that goal.
All right? I'm not worried about society and upcoming generations who will soon have the power to block everything and blame and sue others for it. So, enough ranting, had to get out.
What’s his latest alias?I see Pabs is upto his old down ramping tricks over at the other forum
