Affenhorst
Regular
Well, they state it right in the next paragraph...if it covers the environmental part and Natura 2000, I would think no, as they probably haven't decided yet if they want to do underground mining or not.
Well, they state it right in the next paragraph...if it covers the environmental part and Natura 2000, I would think no, as they probably haven't decided yet if they want to do underground mining or not.
That’s the first use of the word anode in that context that I have ever heard.'
'Anode' is an additive to fossil fuels. It reacts with the fuel to create a psycho-active compound in the vehicles emissions. This compound is the worst greenhouse gas in existence, but it is used by governments and companies because it has the side effect of pacifying the population. Until the 2010's the existence of Anodes was purely hypothetical but it turns out companies have known about them for decades and covered it up.
Not hard to find this stuff out, I managed to learn all of that just on social media. Didn't even have to look at Wikipedia. I can see why the Sami are concerned.
I think this was just a joke.That’s the first use of the word anode in that context that I have ever heard.
I respect your right to have input, and I appreciate you bringing to my attention another meaning of a familiar word, however, using anode in that context, when talking about Talga and processing of graphite from its mine, is completely out of context. I also believe that is NOT the argument the Sami’s are pursuing—although they probably DO use the environmentally harmful anode fuel additive, of which you speak, in their Ski-dos.
Talga has always been about graphite and battery anodes—as in the negative electrode of a battery.
I also didn’t need to look that up on Wikipedia nor be misled by conspiracy theories purported by social media. I used knowledge gained in my Electrical Engineering degree.
I have a parting piece of advice—be very careful of anything you “learn” from social media.
That’s the first use of the word anode in that context that I have ever heard.
I respect your right to have input, and I appreciate you bringing to my attention another meaning of a familiar word, however, using anode in that context, when talking about Talga and processing of graphite from its mine, is completely out of context. I also believe that is NOT the argument the Sami’s are pursuing—although they probably DO use the environmentally harmful anode fuel additive, of which you speak, in their Ski-dos.
Talga has always been about graphite and battery anodes—as in the negative electrode of a battery.
I also didn’t need to look that up on Wikipedia nor be misled by conspiracy theories purported by social media. I used knowledge gained in my Electrical Engineering degree.
I have a parting piece of advice—be very careful of anything you “learn” from social media.
Here it is in a nutshell and rush in the long weekend and I have to hit the slopes..Unfortunately, I turned off my computer without sending the post apparently
We have already submitted the applications for NN and Niska South and North for the processing concession not long ago!! Furthermore, there was also the reason why we do not have the processing concession for NS yet although submitted at the same time as the environmental permit. The permit was rejected because we did not have Natura2000 at that time. But now we have it and the important processing concession should be a formality and we should receive this permit soon. That is how I interpret it. There are no other negative reasons. I have to see when I find the time to look it up again. I know exactly where to but the translation and compilation always takes a while. So take it by the way that we have already submitted the applications for Niska. I will supply this later.
Last note: Exploitation concession means trial mining I think.
'
'Anode' is an additive to fossil fuels. It reacts with the fuel to create a psycho-active compound in the vehicles emissions. This compound is the worst greenhouse gas in existence, but it is used by governments and companies because it has the side effect of pacifying the population. Until the 2010's the existence of Anodes was purely hypothetical but it turns out companies have known about them for decades and covered it up.
Not hard to find this stuff out, I managed to learn all of that just on social media. Didn't even have to look at Wikipedia. I can see why the Sami are concerned.
I'm not the least bit worried about that. Their most powerful weapon has hissed not banged and the court was not convinced said meeh and granted us permission. So this argument is forfeited. But I know that at the same time you could mean it as a joke and also again without joking.Vittangibor om grönt ljus till gruvan: ”En sorgens dag”
Vittangiborna Hanna Råman och Ulrik Lidström hade hoppats på ett annat utslag om grafitgruvan i Nunasvaara i mark- och miljödomstolen. – Det här är en sorgens dag, säger Hanna Råman.www.svt.se
Don't tell this new age couple living in harmony with nature in Vittangi. They were listed as parties in the Case file 1573 -20 in the Enviro courts recent DECISION. They might want to use it as a valid argument in a future appeal. I kid you not. Interesting to put faces to names of the local anti resistance that appear in the Case file.
-beserk
That’s the first use of the word anode in that context that I have ever heard.
I respect your right to have input, and I appreciate you bringing to my attention another meaning of a familiar word, however, using anode in that context, when talking about Talga and processing of graphite from its mine, is completely out of context. I also believe that is NOT the argument the Sami’s are pursuing—although they probably DO use the environmentally harmful anode fuel additive, of which you speak, in their Ski-dos.
Talga has always been about graphite and battery anodes—as in the negative electrode of a battery.
I also didn’t need to look that up on Wikipedia nor be misled by conspiracy theories purported by social media. I used knowledge gained in my Electrical Engineering degree.
I have a parting piece of advice—be very careful of anything you “learn” from social media.
For me this doesn't read very positively as far as future expansions are concerned. But I don't want to overinterpret it because I could misunderstand it just as well and it is also an interpretation.Klart – domstol ger tillstånd till grafitgruva utanför Vittangi
Mark- och miljödomstolen ger Talga AB tillstånd att bryta grafit i fyndigheten Nunasvaara södra nära Vittangi i Kiruna kommun. Men ännu är det flera myndighetsbeslut som måste falla på plats innan gruvbrytningen kan starta.www.svt.se
Which part?For me this doesn't read very positively as far as future expansions are concerned. But I don't want to overinterpret it because I could misunderstand it just as well and it is also an interpretation.
The two sentences. As noted, I can misunderstand or mistranslate something. And I interpret a translated interpretation. And I am not a politician, lawyer or bureaucrat.Which part?
IMO - "mining and reindeer herding can coexist" is the only important line in there. That's a general principle, not a statement about this mine specifically. Court is setting the groundwork for future mining activities to be able to happen around Sweden.
Council may have a bit of a huff, but anything they do that's going against the cours decision opens them up to legal action. Which they would lose, and which would only further strengthen the hand of people applying for future mining permits.
And the pro mining Swedish Government will overule any Council nonsense.They could enact new legislation in Swedish parliament, as was the case for Cementa, to give an exception to graphite exploration and declare it of national importance.
If there is a will there is a way.
Talga just phoned me back.
What was explained to me:
1) There is a 3 week period to lodge an appeal,
2) The court will look at it and see if the appeal is credible and based on valid grounds,
3) If the appeal is credible there will be no permit issued until the appeal is heard and a decision made,
4) If it gets this far this process is likely to take approx 6 months,
5) They have a contingency to use the stock pilled or from the test mine,
6) If there is a credible appeal and we win it there is yet a higher court to appeal to and the process above starts again.
Obviously dependant on an appeal being lodged on based on valid grounds.