BRN Discussion Ongoing

[Bravo]

Holy…. What’s going on here

View attachment 71678 View attachment 71679 View attachment 71680 View attachment 71681 View attachment 71683

What point is David Wyatt actually trying to make?

Is he suggesting that BrainChip's technology shouldn't be classified as spiking neural network (SNN) because it's not spiking in nature according to him?

Is he accusing BrainChip of false advertising?

Is he trying to tarnish BrainChip's reputation stating that " the lack of details and open technical information should be a red flag"?

Honestly, how can this type of denigrating communication on the world's largest professional network be considered appropriate?

 

[7für7]

Nintendo To Go In 'Different Direction' To Current AI Trends, Says Miyamoto

Music to our ears

www.nintendolife.com

They are concerned about the safety of the players and data privacy… taking a different path than the hype… which company comes to mind spontaneously that also goes against the hype…

 

[7für7]

What point is David Wyatt actually trying to make?

Is he suggesting that BrainChip's technology shouldn't be classified as spiking neural network (SNN) because it's not spiking in nature according to him?

Is he accusing BrainChip of false advertising?

Is he trying to tarnish BrainChip's reputation stating that " the lack of details and open technical information should be a red flag"?

Honestly, how can this type of denigrating communication on the world's largest professional network be considered appropriate?

The point is that he might not be up to date on the latest developments. Neither regarding BrainChip, nor Intel, because he no longer works there. I can easily imagine that internally at Intel he was already acting like a know-it-all. He’s just an Intel lohi fanboy who wants to talk down BrainChip. Additionally, maybe he’s a shorter? Who knows. His profile say “investor” maybe he is investing in an other company trying to down ramp openly? DH

 

[Guzzi62]

What point is David Wyatt actually trying to make?

Is he suggesting that BrainChip's technology shouldn't be classified as spiking neural network (SNN) because it's not spiking in nature according to him?

Is he accusing BrainChip of false advertising?

Is he trying to tarnish BrainChip's reputation stating that " the lack of details and open technical information should be a red flag"?

Honestly, how can this type of denigrating communication on the world's largest professional network be considered appropriate?

He is basically calling it a scam, no more spiking than his hair after a rough pillow.

That's an outright lie, and he should be forced to apologize or kicked out on Linkedin.

 

[7für7]

He is basically calling it a scam, no more spiking than his hair after a rough pillow.

That's an outright lie, and he should be forced to apologize or kicked out on Linkedin.

And the reactions on his posts compared to Lewis comment, is showing the quality of his behaviour

 

[Food4 thought]

Sean need to address his share holders as this is just about enough for everyone.
It’s been months since the AGM
It meant to happen before years end yet next week is November and nothing
We deserve to be updated Sean

Is it just me or do others feel this way

I am just feeling disappointed atm
Hopefully this will pass I am usually more positive

 

[Pom down under]

That’s annoying

Think they were taking more about games than the console

 

[Pom down under]

Sean need to address his share holders as this is just about enough for everyone.
It’s been months since the AGM
It meant to happen before years end yet next week is November and nothing
We deserve to be updated Sean

Is it just me or do others feel this way

I am just feeling disappointed atm
Hopefully this will pass I am usually more positive

 

[AARONASX]

Sean need to address his share holders as this is just about enough for everyone.
It’s been months since the AGM
It meant to happen before years end yet next week is November and nothing
We deserve to be updated Sean

Is it just me or do others feel this way

I am just feeling disappointed atm
Hopefully this will pass I am usually more positive

All i want is a statement from Sean or anyone saying like this

"Brainchip is making significant progress. We are approaching the end of the initial phase and there is a strong likelihood of an important announcement in the coming weeks or months regarding potential future opportunities with these either—positive or negative—or partnerships that we can confidently announce to the market"

Plain, simple, doesn't not inflate or promote any profit, IMO

 

[Diogenese]

What point is David Wyatt actually trying to make?

Is he suggesting that BrainChip's technology shouldn't be classified as spiking neural network (SNN) because it's not spiking in nature according to him?

Is he accusing BrainChip of false advertising?

Is he trying to tarnish BrainChip's reputation stating that " the lack of details and open technical information should be a red flag"?

Honestly, how can this type of denigrating communication on the world's largest professional network be considered appropriate?

I don't think Dave knows much about Akida. In fact he admits as much in complaining about available information. The BRN web page has lots of information. His knowledge of Akida seems to be derived from a single presentation at a tech expo.

I think he has confused TENNS with Akida. TENNS does use MACs. Maybe he just woke up for that slide?

Tony Lewis, in his response, stresses that Akida uses "events", so I guess this is to differentiate the new 4-bit Akida from the original 1-bit Akida "spikes".

 

[FiveBucks]

That guy needs something to do! He is not worth anywhere near the 250k he is getting paid imo. At least from a shareholders pov. Don't get help for him, get a replacement who actually is interested in answering shareholders very valid questions........sorry TRIGGERED.

Carry on.

Surely an Ai company can work out a way to save $250k a year using AI.

It wouldn't be hard. Have an AI model generate an automated response. It's basically what we get from Tony in every response!

 

[Bravo]

Qualcomm’s next AI frontier is… your car

Qualcomm thinks smart cars will work a lot like smartphones, and that means AI

www.techradar.com

Extract 1

Extract 2

Extract 3

 

[Smoothsailing]

What point is David Wyatt actually trying to make?

Is he suggesting that BrainChip's technology shouldn't be classified as spiking neural network (SNN) because it's not spiking in nature according to him?

Is he accusing BrainChip of false advertising?

Is he trying to tarnish BrainChip's reputation stating that " the lack of details and open technical information should be a red flag"?

Honestly, how can this type of denigrating communication on the world's largest professional network be considered appropriate?

Agreed and I let Tony know in case he missed it

 

[IloveLamp]

Surely an Ai company can work out a way to save $250k a year using AI.

It wouldn't be hard. Have an AI model generate an automated response. It's basically what we get from Tony in every response!

They're probably blissfully unaware of his lack of care and effort towards shareholders i assume ......or maybe they aren't.

Something needs to change though imo

 

[Pom down under]

They're probably blissfully unaware of his lack of care and effort towards shareholders i assume ......or maybe they aren't.

Something needs to change imo

 

[JB49]

Transforming Healthcare with AI | Innovation, Compliance & Metrics

Watch Tata Elxsi’s webinar on AI in Pharma & MedTech: from VQT and GMP to FDA/EU AI Act compliance, plus metrics to validate clinical AI workflows.

www.tataelxsi.com

This could be a good one to watch

 

[IloveLamp]

"Our team had that morning successfully negotiated a major development contract with ESA"

Sandi Habinc on LinkedIn: #iac2024 #spacecomputing

I had the great pleasure to discuss the future of European space microelectronics with Dr Josef Aschbacher, Director General of the European Space Agency -…

www.linkedin.com

 

[Diogenese]

Qualcomm’s next AI frontier is… your car

Qualcomm thinks smart cars will work a lot like smartphones, and that means AI

www.techradar.com

Extract 1

View attachment 71687


Extract 2

View attachment 71689

Extract 3
View attachment 71688

Hi Bravo,

The latest Qualcomm patent I found indicates they are using a hynrid analog compute-in-memory neuron arrangement:

US2023297335A1 Hybrid Compute-in-Memory 20220315

The capacitor C is charged when both the switches S1 & S2 are closed.

US2023115373A1 ACCUMULATOR FOR DIGITAL COMPUTATION-IN-MEMORY ARCHITECTURES 20211013

a method for in-memory computation. The method generally includes: accumulating, via each digital counter of a plurality of digital counters, output signals on a respective column of multiple columns of a memory, wherein a plurality of memory cells are on each of the multiple columns, the plurality of memory cells storing multiple bits representing weights of a neural network, wherein the plurality of memory cells of each of the multiple columns correspond to different word-lines of the memory; adding, via an adder circuit, output signals of the plurality of digital counters; and accumulating, via an accumulator, output signals of the adder circuit.

 

[7für7]

Hi Bravo,

The latest Qualcomm patent I found indicates they are using a hynrid analog compute-in-memory neuron arrangement:

US2023297335A1 Hybrid Compute-in-Memory 20220315

View attachment 71695


The capacitor C is charged when both the switches S1 & S2 are closed.

US2023115373A1 ACCUMULATOR FOR DIGITAL COMPUTATION-IN-MEMORY ARCHITECTURES 20211013

a method for in-memory computation. The method generally includes: accumulating, via each digital counter of a plurality of digital counters, output signals on a respective column of multiple columns of a memory, wherein a plurality of memory cells are on each of the multiple columns, the plurality of memory cells storing multiple bits representing weights of a neural network, wherein the plurality of memory cells of each of the multiple columns correspond to different word-lines of the memory; adding, via an adder circuit, output signals of the plurality of digital counters; and accumulating, via an accumulator, output signals of the adder circuit.

Look……I don’t think they’ve got a smarter solution than our nice beautiful brains, okay? Huuuuuge difference. But………., never mind, to each their own …right? That’s true …We’re not living in a planned economy..We’re not living in little Rocket Man’s land!
BUT EVERYONE, BELIEVE ME, EVERYONE WILL WANT A PIECE OF OUR BRAIN… they’ll come… because it’s the only real brain… beautiful brain! AND OUR BRAIN WILL GET BIGGER AND STRONGER THAN ANY OTHER BRAIN… remember my words… it’s true!

 

[itsol4605]

Hi Bravo,

The latest Qualcomm patent I found indicates they are using a hynrid analog compute-in-memory neuron arrangement:

US2023297335A1 Hybrid Compute-in-Memory 20220315

View attachment 71695


The capacitor C is charged when both the switches S1 & S2 are closed.

US2023115373A1 ACCUMULATOR FOR DIGITAL COMPUTATION-IN-MEMORY ARCHITECTURES 20211013

a method for in-memory computation. The method generally includes: accumulating, via each digital counter of a plurality of digital counters, output signals on a respective column of multiple columns of a memory, wherein a plurality of memory cells are on each of the multiple columns, the plurality of memory cells storing multiple bits representing weights of a neural network, wherein the plurality of memory cells of each of the multiple columns correspond to different word-lines of the memory; adding, via an adder circuit, output signals of the plurality of digital counters; and accumulating, via an accumulator, output signals of the adder circuit.

This slmple principle should be a patent?