F
Filobeddo
Guest
About Fkn time, now just wake up Joe & hold his hand while he signs
should give a sentiment shift for sc tech sector
Last edited by a moderator:
BRN Discussion Ongoing
- Thread starter TechGirl
- Start date
About Fkn time, now just wake up Joe & hold his hand while he signs
should give a sentiment shift for sc tech sector
Shadow I take notice of the experienced people in Finance and one told me 1 year ago that "they" will never let us have this Brainchip no matter what we think.
And I print out every post from TECH and highlight every mention of INTEL and there are numerous. 2024. noted.
The last 1.5 yrs of price action would seem to support a consideration that the above might actually be true.
The shorting action today is relentless and continious with any attempts to rebound being smashed back down again. INSTO work.
Y.
Fullmoonfever
Top 20
Maybe need to start digging around for ownership links while awaiting the elusive T20 breakdown for some fun...break the monotony of the current SP gyrations.
They can just list someone like Citicorp Nom as a T20 and we would be none the wiser who sits behind the nominee accounts unless the company instigates a trace request which would take time to get the finer details.
Looking at some US reports I see IBM actually owned a couple hund grands worth (yes chicken feed to them) but in direct ownership at Dec 2021 as part of 401k. Don't know if changed to now though.
Is interesting their Global Advisor is State Street which could be nothing but does make me wonder about the last pic sample of some Sec Reports....notice the entity?
Companies have to disclose these in the SEC Reports.
The sad difficulty of course is finding out Brokers / Nom accounts holdings are buried in.
Also at June 21 the ACT (Aus Govt) also held BRN shares....they don't stipulate how many in each company they have though sadly. Could be bugger all or a reasonable amount.
They can just list someone like Citicorp Nom as a T20 and we would be none the wiser who sits behind the nominee accounts unless the company instigates a trace request which would take time to get the finer details.
Looking at some US reports I see IBM actually owned a couple hund grands worth (yes chicken feed to them) but in direct ownership at Dec 2021 as part of 401k. Don't know if changed to now though.
Is interesting their Global Advisor is State Street which could be nothing but does make me wonder about the last pic sample of some Sec Reports....notice the entity?
Companies have to disclose these in the SEC Reports.
The sad difficulty of course is finding out Brokers / Nom accounts holdings are buried in.
Also at June 21 the ACT (Aus Govt) also held BRN shares....they don't stipulate how many in each company they have though sadly. Could be bugger all or a reasonable amount.
Shadow59
Regular
I will have to admit I am in total shock at how fast the price dropped today. Definitely a very targeted and controlled campaign.
Looking at the 3 minute chart it seems to be working in roughly regular pulses.
I was lucky to have some spare funds and managed to pick up some on the last drop, hopefully it will be the last for now and there will be some recovery. BUT who can pick the bottom?
It amazes me how deep pockets some people/institutions have to be able to do this, and how corrupt their minds must be.
I guess they will just say the cliche "It's just business?
Looking at the 3 minute chart it seems to be working in roughly regular pulses.
I was lucky to have some spare funds and managed to pick up some on the last drop, hopefully it will be the last for now and there will be some recovery. BUT who can pick the bottom?
It amazes me how deep pockets some people/institutions have to be able to do this, and how corrupt their minds must be.
I guess they will just say the cliche "It's just business?
I will have to admit I am in total shock at how fast the price dropped today. Definitely a very targeted and controlled campaign.
Looking at the 3 minute chart it seems to be working in roughly regular pulses.
I was lucky to have some spare funds and managed to pick up some on the last drop, hopefully it will be the last for now and there will be some recovery. BUT who can pick the bottom?
It amazes me how deep pockets some people/institutions have to be able to do this, and how corrupt their minds must be.
I guess they will just say the cliche "It's just business?
I'm just waiting now (after admittedly buying right as it all dropped... doh!) for the volume to settle and then I'll buy a tad more. The show goes on..
Proga
Regular
If I was the CEO of Intel, I'd be congratulating Congress as well.
D
Deleted member 118
Guest
To me it looks like someone is trying to accumulate at this level now with 100,000 blocks on the sell lines set up. But what do I know after paying top dollar for my shares this morning.
Bombersfan
Regular
Jesus this a meltdown and a half. I thought you’d reached peak looney a couple weeks ago when you wrote in bold capitals that Citicorp ARE activating a hostile takeover…FACT. But the 10% retrace after a huge run up the last few weeks and you’ve flown right off the handle. We’ve been zig zagging from $0.80-$1.25 for months, I assume traders and shorters are making a lot of money. Hopefully with new overall market sentiment improvement we bounce slightly higher, say from $1-$1.40, but we’re not going north without material detail. The news flow is amazing but it seems to me the market has us valued around $1 until contracts or revenue start flowing. It’s the market that sets the price, not Pitt st research, or fact finders son or whoever else you quoted when suggesting we should be $1.70. I want this to be $5 as much as anyone but it’s not realistic yet. You’re making a complete fool of yourself here.
VictorG
Member
Yak is right, I have been trading for 40 yrs and I have seen these trading patterns many times, the tell tale signs are very obvious.
If the price drop was profit taking the share price would have clawed back most of the drop by now and it wouldn't have happened so rapidly .
The fact that the price dropped sharply in short time and remains stubbornly at these low prices suggests that not only are shorters involved but they are co-ordinating their short attack between themselves.
I also know there is little that can be done other than taking advantage of the lower prices. I don't like that some retail investors may have been stopped out by the sharp drop, but they may have contributed to the drop with their stop losses.
As a side note, its usually the very best disrupter companies that draw the attention of shorters, they cant help themselves. In almost 100% of the cases, the shorters get burnt to a crisp.
If the price drop was profit taking the share price would have clawed back most of the drop by now and it wouldn't have happened so rapidly .
The fact that the price dropped sharply in short time and remains stubbornly at these low prices suggests that not only are shorters involved but they are co-ordinating their short attack between themselves.
I also know there is little that can be done other than taking advantage of the lower prices. I don't like that some retail investors may have been stopped out by the sharp drop, but they may have contributed to the drop with their stop losses.
As a side note, its usually the very best disrupter companies that draw the attention of shorters, they cant help themselves. In almost 100% of the cases, the shorters get burnt to a crisp.
raybot
Member
So from a practical viewpoint, what can genuine long-term retail investors do?
1/ Don't sell your holdings - it may pay to reconsider using stop/losses at all
2/ Make sure you use your voting rights - Vote with Peter and the board at the next AGM
Not financial advice, just looking at whatever powers a retail investor has. Any more ideas?
1/ Don't sell your holdings - it may pay to reconsider using stop/losses at all
2/ Make sure you use your voting rights - Vote with Peter and the board at the next AGM
Not financial advice, just looking at whatever powers a retail investor has. Any more ideas?
D
Deleted member 118
Guest
VictorG
Member
Buy and hold, it's a shorters kryptonite.
F
Filobeddo
Guest
Yeah what bullshit, like Intel, Nvid etc need a free pass top up
But who’s congratulating Nancy ??
HopalongPetrovski
I'm Spartacus!
Yes, I have my low ball order in as well.
If they are gonna push it down, may as well take advantage of it.
We know this stuff happens, seen it many times before.
Feel for people who may have over leveraged themselves and feeling heat because of this dip, but know too, that this stuff is all part of the game.
AKIDA BALLISTA
AKIDA EVERYWHERE
GLTAH
Shadow59
Regular
Rob, looking at the way the share price has been manipulated today, one has to wonder if something would have been evident in the top 20 list of a major accumulation. I know there is very little we can do on a personal level other than look after our own little piece of the world and make sure we do not get tricked out of what is ours.
My personal take is I'm pretty sure someone wants a lot of BRN, so someone sees a lot of value here. I just buy everytime it drops like this if I can afford to. But I am not selling when it goes down and I do not use stop losses.
This is not financial advice.
LexLuther77
Regular
Where is the ASX with a speeding ticket now eh? bl@dy sh$ts me tbh....
Bravo
If ARM was an arm, BRN would be its biceps💪!
Cambridge, UK – July 28, 2022 – Arm today announced the appointment of Spencer Collins as Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer. Collins will lead Arm’s global legal organization and report to Arm CEO Rene Haas.
Collins joins Arm from SoftBank Investment Advisers (SBIA), the investment manager of the world’s largest technology-focused investment fund, SoftBank Vision Fund, where he served as Managing Partner and General Counsel.
Arm Announces Appointment of Spencer Collins as Chief Legal Officer
Collins will lead Arm’s global legal organization and report to Arm CEO Rene Haas.www.arm.com
I wonder if Spencer Collins's appointment to ARM has anything to do with the potential creation of a consortium of companies who have expressed a desire to strike a deal with SoftBank to acquire ARM - companies such as Qualcomm, Intel and Samsung????
The ramifications of a consortium such as this being formed would be MASSIVE for BrainChip IMO.
Qualcomm eyeing to buy ARM with the help of its rivals - The Times of India
Qualcomm, the company behind Snapdragon chipsets, wants to buy ARM, the company behind every chipset powering the device near you. There is one proble
timesofindia.indiatimes.com
Qualcomm Wants to Form a Consortium to Acquire ARM: Report
Qualcomm CEO Christian Amon has reportedly shown interest in buying Arm and wants to form a consortium with Samsung, Intel, and more for this.
beebom.com
D
Deleted member 118
Guest
Oh well just brought another few thousand guess it’s noodles for dinner this week
Similar threads
