Another odd thing about this patent application is that its priority date is 20220125. The normal publication date would have been 18 months after filing - 20230725.
There is a clue in the Accepted Journal Date, which is 20230511, the same as the Publication date.
This means that the application has undergone expedited examination by IPAU, the Australian Patent Office.
https://www.gestalt.law/insights/are-we-there-yet-expediting-examination-of-patents-in-australia#:~:text=It is possible to request expedited examination of,a granted patent by up to 10 months.
Expedited Examination
It is possible to request expedited examination of an Australian patent application in certain circumstances. If IPAustralia expedites examination it will issue a first examination report, or an acceptance notice, within 8 weeks of requesting examination. This can potentially shorten the time to obtain a granted patent by up to 10 months.
There are no additional official fees for requesting expedited examination. Under Regulation 3.17 the Commissioner of Patents has a discretion to grant a request to expedite examination if it is in the public interest or there are special circumstances that make it desirable. This is a fairly broad discretion that could include various types of circumstances.
IPAustralia’s Patent Examiner’s Manual provided in 2.13.4.3 that such circumstances may include:
a) the invention is in a field of technology that is environmentally beneficial (‘green’ technology);
b) the applicant is a small to medium sized enterprise (SME);
c) a valid request has been made under a Global Patent Prosecution Highway (GPPH) agreement; or
d) that there are pressing commercial reasons, such as the existence of
(i) a potential infringement or
(ii) a potential license or sale of the technology.
...
Green Technology
Otherwise, if the invention relates to a technology that saves on energy or materials or has an environmental benefit then this may also qualify.
Global Patent Prosecution Highway
If a corresponding patent application overseas has been examined and at least one claim has been found to be novel and inventive then this may provide a basis for a request under the GPPH.
This is not an exhaustive list, and we know we meet a) and b), but let's hope the reason is not d)(i).
Last edited: