wilzy123
Founding Member
I forgot to paste what I was meaning. My bad.
View attachment 27931
Why buy 9929, when you can buy more!
I forgot to paste what I was meaning. My bad.
View attachment 27931
I think it maybe a shorters lucky number for today only. Anyone else wishing to give it a try?I forgot to paste what I was meaning. My bad.
View attachment 27931
Where did you see this?$1.4 mill for this 4c
I'd like to think 118k was purely IP sales
in the coffee cupWhere did you see this?
Reasonable sort of commentary @skutza. I'd be happy to see some revenue but not pinning any great hopes on it as I think more likely in the back end of calendar 2023 now. I was hopeful of a bit earlier but strikes me that the job of closing deals is a bit harder than we, and possibly the company, expected. We can blame world conditions and I'm sure that's part of it - but closing deals seems to be tough and then there's long lead time for revenue flows. None of it bothers me that much - there is clearly progress from public comments of partners and the Intel connection really put some extra foundations under my investment thesis. So it's all down to patience.So, I'll stir the pot a little. Reading back the last few days, I've seen discussions on SP, revenue and LDA. So looking at time frames and other bits and pieces, without people getting nasty, what are peoples thoughts?
Here are mine. I'd be very disappointed if the LDA call comes to time and no good news has come forward. (price sensitive ASX ann) If the SP hasn't moved, I'm ok with that, it'll do what it does. I'd just be disappointed they made the call so early without some good news. AKIDA 2000 or decent 4c for example.
Regarding the 4c, IMO should be better than the last one but $500-$1 miil would make me happy. That would show progress. I think the war, covid and financial markets are a good enough reason for slower than expected progress.
Arm, Intel or anyone using our IP without paying a licence fee would be unacceptable. The only way these people should be allowed to use our IP is by buying the licence or using a third party that already has. It was mentioned earlier than someone wouldn't mind if those companies didn't. I can guarantee you that Megachips wouldn't see it the same way!.
Finally, if we don't get another licence deal or lumpy revenue before the AGM, has Sean not "done his job" and should he be judged accordingly after being so bold? I believe he wanted to be judged and using poor markets can't be an excuse as this should be taken into account before making such comments. On the other hand, if we do see another licence and some lumpy revenue before hand he should be judged accordingly with holders singing in the streets holding up signs with God save KING Sean on them. IMO have fun, and be kind.
I am happy to wait and not speculate.So, I'll stir the pot a little. Reading back the last few days, I've seen discussions on SP, revenue and LDA. So looking at time frames and other bits and pieces, without people getting nasty, what are peoples thoughts?
Here are mine. I'd be very disappointed if the LDA call comes to time and no good news has come forward. (price sensitive ASX ann) If the SP hasn't moved, I'm ok with that, it'll do what it does. I'd just be disappointed they made the call so early without some good news. AKIDA 2000 or decent 4c for example.
Regarding the 4c, IMO should be better than the last one but $500-$1 miil would make me happy. That would show progress. I think the war, covid and financial markets are a good enough reason for slower than expected progress.
Arm, Intel or anyone using our IP without paying a licence fee would be unacceptable. The only way these people should be allowed to use our IP is by buying the licence or using a third party that already has. It was mentioned earlier than someone wouldn't mind if those companies didn't. I can guarantee you that Megachips wouldn't see it the same way!.
Finally, if we don't get another licence deal or lumpy revenue before the AGM, has Sean not "done his job" and should he be judged accordingly after being so bold? I believe he wanted to be judged and using poor markets can't be an excuse as this should be taken into account before making such comments. On the other hand, if we do see another licence and some lumpy revenue before hand he should be judged accordingly with holders singing in the streets holding up signs with God save KING Sean on them. IMO have fun, and be kind.
Where are you hiding the other 6 dwarfs.I'm just happy
I'm just happy
Funny that ... I was thinking around the same $$$ figure $1.2/$1.4 mil$1.4 mill for this 4c
I'd like to think 118k was purely IP sales
I think you are referring to me regarding the IP license. I have no idea who is paying what, but I’m pretty sure the license fees are kept a secret for good reason and what they are sold for are decided on a case by case basis. I don’t know if I said I’d be happy if ARM or INTEL didn’t pay it. I’m just happy holding shares. As for calling up LDA I am sure management did it for a good reason I am happy to hear their explanation at the AGM. I think BrainChip has done very well so far so I wouldn’t be in a hurry to crucify Sean.So, I'll stir the pot a little. Reading back the last few days, I've seen discussions on SP, revenue and LDA. So looking at time frames and other bits and pieces, without people getting nasty, what are peoples thoughts?
Here are mine. I'd be very disappointed if the LDA call comes to time and no good news has come forward. (price sensitive ASX ann) If the SP hasn't moved, I'm ok with that, it'll do what it does. I'd just be disappointed they made the call so early without some good news. AKIDA 2000 or decent 4c for example.
Regarding the 4c, IMO should be better than the last one but $500-$1 miil would make me happy. That would show progress. I think the war, covid and financial markets are a good enough reason for slower than expected progress.
Arm, Intel or anyone using our IP without paying a licence fee would be unacceptable. The only way these people should be allowed to use our IP is by buying the licence or using a third party that already has. It was mentioned earlier than someone wouldn't mind if those companies didn't. I can guarantee you that Megachips wouldn't see it the same way!.
Finally, if we don't get another licence deal or lumpy revenue before the AGM, has Sean not "done his job" and should he be judged accordingly after being so bold? I believe he wanted to be judged and using poor markets can't be an excuse as this should be taken into account before making such comments. On the other hand, if we do see another licence and some lumpy revenue before hand he should be judged accordingly with holders singing in the streets holding up signs with God save KING Sean on them. IMO have fun, and be kind.
Yes I agree overall, but what I suppose I was wondering is what people's thoughts were. 1 year low revenue, 2 years? three years? For me I've been holding around 5 years, but if you'd asked me 5 years ago I would've said 5 yearsI think you are referring to me regarding the IP license. I have no idea who is paying what, but I’m pretty sure the license fees are kept a secret for good reason and what they are sold for are decided on a case by case basis. I don’t know if I said I’d be happy if ARM or INTEL didn’t pay it. I’m just happy holding shares. As for calling up LDA I am sure management did it for a good reason I am happy to hear their explanation at the AGM. I think BrainChip has done very well so far so I wouldn’t be in a hurry to crucify Sean.
I have no idea what the 4C will show but I know that if there is no revenue then there will be plenty of people that will try to use that to lower the sp so they can scoop up shares. That won’t worry me as I have no plans to sell any shares. So much in the pipe line, but for me, I’m waiting until the Renesas Akida inspired chip hits the market. I suspect we might get pushed towards 60c and then pushed back up again. For those that have followed BrainChip for years, the next 2 are probably what they have been waiting for. Happy days for me.
Ok, gotcha. I’m not (delete swearing) waiting another 5 years to get rich. I’m happy now though.Yes I agree overall, but what I suppose I was wondering is what people's thoughts were. 1 year low revenue, 2 years? three years? For me I've been holding around 5 years, but if you'd asked me 5 years ago I would've said 5 yearsHowever I'm happy with the progress to this point as they seem to be "lining up the ducks nicely" but if in 5 years we haven't seen significant revenue, well I'm retiring, so 3 years for me I'd like to see us breaking even at worse.
Extract from the Nixon tapes?Ok, gotcha. I’m not (delete swearing) waiting another 5 years to get rich. I’m happy now though.