We are in the right place at the right time.
You want to save on power and increase performance, Companies just select and add BRN to cart.
I think most are content and confident with their knowledge of the company called Brainchip and are patiently waiting for success!No one here this morning
![]()
A very interesting article. Not sure how relevant to BRN.
![]()
Intel is working on a new type of processor you've never heard of
Meet the versatile processing unit (VPU)www.techradar.com
Afternoon Uiux and Medina.
Cheers for posting Medina.
Uiux, the NEURAL COMPUTE SUBSYSTEM ( NCS ) sounds promising.
Regards,
Esq.
At the beginning it was shorts go up our price goes down, now we are seeing an increase in shorts and our price is also going up, looks like they are well and truly buggered and can’t get the price down.
What great advertising for Mercedes Benze Drive Pilot! These complaints (see above) about Tesla falsely advertising that its Autopilot and Full Self Driving features are capable of operating autonomously, when in fact they can’t will only help shine more light on what Mercedes-Benz Drive Pilot offers by way of comparison.California’s Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) has accused Tesla of falsely advertising its Autopilot and Full Self-Driving (FSD) features.
View attachment 13522
Hi Ui,Esq, we know Intel have heaps of options for neural compute, not just Loihi
It's interesting that Intel are adding it into desktop processors though. How it relates to BrainChip ? Well we are targeting edge, but personally I am quite fond of having a neuromorphic chip in my PC.
We do have patents that cover this set up I think (@Diogenese can prob explain better if I'm wrong)
US11157800B2 - Neural processor based accelerator system and method - Google Patents
A configurable spiking neural network based accelerator system is provided. The accelerator system may be executed on an expansion card which may be a printed circuit board. The system includes one or more application specific integrated circuits comprising at least one spiking neural processing...patents.google.com
View attachment 13584
Either way it's interesting and a story to watch
Hi Ui,
Claim 1 of this patent is very narrow (the breadth of a claim is inversely proportional to its length). When it comes to patent claims, words are the enemy - the fewer, the better.
To infringe the claim, the infringement must include all the items included in the claim in the configuration defined in the claim, and having the same interoperability as defined in the claim.
1. A spiking neural network accelerator system comprising:
a spiking neural network comprising digital hardware logic
configured to perform functions associated with artificial spiking neurons, dendrites and dynamic synapses, wherein the spiking neural network comprises:
a plurality of neuron circuits,
the plurality of neuron circuits being digital neuron circuits,
where each of the plurality of neuron circuits has a unique address; and
a plurality of synapse circuits,
the plurality of synapse circuits being digital synapse circuits,
where each of the plurality of synapse circuits has a respective register configured to hold a respective unique address of each of the plurality of neuron circuits connected to the synapse circuit,
wherein each synapse circuit generates a value representative of an interval between input spikes,
wherein each neuron circuit forms a one-to-many connection to at least a portion of the plurality of synapse circuits,
wherein neuron circuit-synapse circuit connectivity is configurable by connection data received from a host computing device, and
wherein each neuron circuit integrates and combines each individually produced value from each connected synapse circuit to produce an output value that is representative of a biological neuron membrane potential,
wherein communication of a spike event in the spiking neural network is expressed as an address of an originating neuron circuit that originated the spike event,
the spike event being placed on an Address Event Representation (AER) bus, and
wherein an efficacy of a respective connection between a respective neuron circuit and a synapse circuit is determined by autonomous learning by the digital hardware logic operating without software involvement; and
an interface to connect the spiking neural network to the host computing device,
wherein the spiking neural network is initially configured by the host computing device via the interface to make connections between the plurality of neuron circuits and the plurality of synapse circuits of the spiking neural network to perform a specific neural computation task.
There are many 3rd party AI accelerators and co-processors, so without reverse engineering the Intel arrangement, we can't really know if their arrangement conforms to the BrainChip patent claims.
We did see this article a while back - if I'm not mistaken, one of our regular posters (Marketman) from HC wrote it.It is a great article, in spite of its age. But what motivated JWPM Consulting to do such an in-depth article in the first place?
Good article, thanks M:A very interesting article. Not sure how relevant to BRN.
![]()
Intel is working on a new type of processor you've never heard of
Meet the versatile processing unit (VPU)www.techradar.com
Sorry, just reminded me of this..
Diogenese ..... Many thanks for sharing your knowledge......Hi Ui,
Claim 1 of this patent is very narrow (the breadth of a claim is inversely proportional to its length). When it comes to patent claims, words are the enemy - the fewer, the better.
To infringe the claim, the infringement must include all the items included in the claim in the configuration defined in the claim, and having the same interoperability as defined in the claim.
1. A spiking neural network accelerator system comprising:
a spiking neural network comprising digital hardware logic
configured to perform functions associated with artificial spiking neurons, dendrites and dynamic synapses, wherein the spiking neural network comprises:
a plurality of neuron circuits,
the plurality of neuron circuits being digital neuron circuits,
where each of the plurality of neuron circuits has a unique address; and
a plurality of synapse circuits,
the plurality of synapse circuits being digital synapse circuits,
where each of the plurality of synapse circuits has a respective register configured to hold a respective unique address of each of the plurality of neuron circuits connected to the synapse circuit,
wherein each synapse circuit generates a value representative of an interval between input spikes,
wherein each neuron circuit forms a one-to-many connection to at least a portion of the plurality of synapse circuits,
wherein neuron circuit-synapse circuit connectivity is configurable by connection data received from a host computing device, and
wherein each neuron circuit integrates and combines each individually produced value from each connected synapse circuit to produce an output value that is representative of a biological neuron membrane potential,
wherein communication of a spike event in the spiking neural network is expressed as an address of an originating neuron circuit that originated the spike event,
the spike event being placed on an Address Event Representation (AER) bus, and
wherein an efficacy of a respective connection between a respective neuron circuit and a synapse circuit is determined by autonomous learning by the digital hardware logic operating without software involvement; and
an interface to connect the spiking neural network to the host computing device,
wherein the spiking neural network is initially configured by the host computing device via the interface to make connections between the plurality of neuron circuits and the plurality of synapse circuits of the spiking neural network to perform a specific neural computation task.
There are many 3rd party AI accelerators and co-processors, so without reverse engineering the Intel arrangement, we can't really know if their arrangement conforms to the BrainChip patent claims.
There is this dude...Diogenese ..... Many thanks for sharing your knowledge......
Just a quick question for you, given your depth of knowledge about such matters ....
I was just wondering, is there anyone specific within the BRN Co organisation, that actually records or is specifically employed to check out these types of patents (follow up's) for potential infringement purposes ........ or is that just something our patent attorneys follow up on or do they then engage as part of their services, other suitably qualified experts to follow up on same and report back to them and the Co.