Thanks
@Diogenese.
I've just run your post past my buddy ChatGPT and here's the response I received.
ChatGPT 5:
1. Comparing Ethos U85 and Akida 3
Ethos U85
- Limited to INT8 or lower precision.
- Designed primarily for CNNs (convolutional neural networks) and some newer architectures like Transformers, but still tuned for image, vision, and low-to-mid precision inference.
- Weight compression, clustering, and pruning help with efficiency, but it’s still fundamentally in the “traditional NPU” space.
- Very well suited for consumer devices, IoT, and embedded AI where tasks are quantized to 8-bit or less.
Akida 3
- Expected to support INT16 and FP32 in addition to low-bit SNN modes.
- This opens the door to high-precision workloads — e.g., certain medical imaging, radar/SAR processing, industrial inspection, scientific data analytics — where you can’t afford the precision loss of 8-bit quantization.
- Still ultra-low power thanks to neuromorphic event-based processing.
- Could run mixed workloads (spiking and non-spiking) at the sensor edge.
2. Implications if Akida 3 Exceeds Ethos U85 in Precision
If Akida 3 can cover
all the U85’s use cases
plus high-precision domains that the U85 can’t touch, then:
- BrainChip could potentially “superset” the market — competing in all U85 application spaces and in several new verticals where U85 simply isn’t viable.
- It would also position BrainChip as a partner rather than just a competitor — because ARM licensees could still integrate Akida alongside Cortex CPUs and Ethos NPUs for mixed workloads.
3. Size of the Ethos U85 Market
ARM NPUs are increasingly going into:
- Smartphones & tablets
- Consumer IoT devices
- Smart cameras / vision sensors
- Automotive driver monitoring & ADAS
- Robotics & drones
- AR/VR devices
Given ARM’s licensing footprint, the U85 market could be tens to hundreds of millions of units annually once adoption ramps.
If Akida 3 is drop-in compatible with ARM system designs (which it already tends to be), BrainChip could target this same customer base — either as:
- A replacement in cases where high precision or neuromorphic advantages are needed
- A complementary co-processor for event-based or ultra-low power workloads.
4. Ideal Application Areas Where Akida 3 Could Beat U85
- Medical imaging devices needing edge processing without quantization artifacts.
- SAR and radar systems for defense or environmental monitoring.
- Industrial inspection systems where measurement tolerances are tight.
- Scientific instrumentation in field research.
- High-end automotive perception stacks needing both low latency and precision.
- Secure edge devices that must process locally without cloud and without sacrificing accuracy.
If you want, I can map
Ethos U85’s public design targets against
Akida 3’s potential capabilities so you can see exactly where the overlap and expansion opportunities are. That would make the competitive positioning very clear.
You said:
Yes please.
ChatGPT said:
Here’s a structured comparison of
ARM Ethos-U85 vs.
BrainChip Akida 3 with overlap and expansion mapped clearly.
1. Overlap — Where Akida 3 Could Compete Directly with U85
Feature / Use Case | Ethos-U85 | Akida 3 | Comments |
---|
INT8 inference for vision AI |  |  | Both handle low-bit CNN/Transformer workloads efficiently. |
Edge AI in ARM-based SoCs |  |  | Akida is already ARM-compatible and could replace U85 in designs. |
Consumer IoT & smart home devices |  |  | E.g., cameras, voice assistants, home hubs — same target market. |
Robotics & drones |  |  | Both can handle perception & navigation; Akida offers ultra-low power SNN modes. |
Automotive driver monitoring |  |  | Akida could match U85 for INT8 workloads, but also add mixed precision. |
AR/VR lightweight inference |  |  | Both could run vision-based gesture tracking or object recognition. |
2. Expansion — Where Akida 3 Could Offer More Than U85
Feature / Use Case | U85 Limitations | Akida 3 Advantage |
---|
High precision (INT16 / FP32) | Only ≤INT8 | Akida 3 can run models that require higher precision, e.g., medical imaging, radar processing, industrial measurement. |
Mixed-mode processing | Primarily CNNs / Transformers | Akida 3 can combine SNN + ANN + mixed precision in one device. |
Event-based data handling | Not designed for spikes | Akida 3 natively supports event-driven SNN processing, reducing power & latency. |
On-device learning / adaptation | Limited to retraining off-device | Akida 3 supports incremental learning on-chip — key for adaptive edge AI. |
Sparse computing efficiency | Relies on compression & pruning | Akida 3 exploits sparsity at the architectural level without preprocessing overhead. |
3. Market Size & Entry Points
Ethos U85 Target Segments (High-Volume ARM Licensing):
- Smartphones (tens of millions annually)
- Smart cameras & home devices
- Embedded industrial AI
- Low-power automotive systems
Akida 3 Entry Strategy:
- Replacement: For U85 use cases that require more precision or event-based efficiency.
- Complementary Co-Processor: Add alongside U85 in ARM SoCs for heterogeneous workloads (U85 for bulk CNN, Akida for adaptive SNN & high precision).
- Standalone in Niche Markets: Where U85 simply can’t go — e.g., SAR imaging, advanced radar, in-body medical devices.
4. Strategic Implications for BrainChip
- Leverage ARM’s ecosystem: If marketed as ARM-friendly IP, Akida 3 could be pitched to the same silicon partners already licensing U85.
- Precision-based differentiation: BrainChip can claim “U85 compatibility plus high-precision reach.”
- Defense & medical edge: Especially valuable for contracts where accuracy matters more than raw throughput.