no doubt you're a glass half empty type of person. yep big price to pay but locke stumping up and risking their cash, if they win, we win.Locke and its funding may be a necessary evil which was clearly becoming of increasing importance and urgency. The terms highlight that. But now having read the announcement again, it seems we have replaced one existential risk to AVZ's existence with another - also with a fairly short off-ramp time-line. Risky business in the big leagues! Hope NF and Co know what they are doing - will look forward to hearing the explanations delivered at the AGM, and gain some awareness of plans in the back pocket should this situation drag beyond the next 2 years and repayment looms. While there will likely be ways to avoid the worst possible outcomes, if it comes to that, like a wider shareholder raising, it's still a legitimate concern.
Otherwise though am happy to see funding. It'll be very interesting now to see if the DRC's attitudes towards meeting us and trying to work through to a resolution change now that they understand we can't be financially starved into submission, at least in the short to medium-term. I expect that it might.
Let's get negotiations back on track!
Also, any guesses as to what fair SP value might look like in Sep 2024? Certainly not the .01 that fat boy was offering, but then again it would be nowhere near the last traded price. Perhaps 15c? So if we do get a way out of this mess we'll see Locke acquiring about 300 million more cheap shares. Unfortunate but necessary, namely the price of doing business without much leverage.