AVZ Discussion 2022

Winenut

TROLLS LIVE IN BASEMENTS WITH THEIR MUMS
Are we back on the $10 gravy train?

:D
1729774182197.gif
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 4 users

Mr_Tones83

Regular
ICSID update (I checked yesterday and it wasn't yet updated, so obviously updated overnight)

1000019198.jpg



Sounds like there is dispute over documents to be produced as both parties have asked the Tribunal to decide on production of documents:

"The Tribunal has discretion to decide on the relevance and admissibility of the evidence adduced by the parties, and can exercise the power to summon further evidence at any stage of the case (Arbitration Rule 36(3)). If there is a dispute between the parties about the production of a document or category of documents, the Tribunal will decide that dispute, taking into account all relevant circumstances including:
  • the scope and timeliness of the request
  • the relevance and materiality of the documents requested
  • the burden of production
  • the basis of the objection to produce the document (Arbitration Rule 37).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 15 users
ICSID update (I checked yesterday and it wasn't yet updated, so obviously updated overnight)

View attachment 71757


Sounds like there is dispute over documents to be produced as both parties have asked the Tribunal to decide on production of documents:

"The Tribunal has discretion to decide on the relevance and admissibility of the evidence adduced by the parties, and can exercise the power to summon further evidence at any stage of the case (Arbitration Rule 36(3)). If there is a dispute between the parties about the production of a document or category of documents, the Tribunal will decide that dispute, taking into account all relevant circumstances including:
  • the scope and timeliness of the request
  • the relevance and materiality of the documents requested
  • the burden of production
  • the basis of the objection to produce the document (Arbitration Rule 37).
This happened 6 days after geo's prophecy. Halloween is coming. Doesn't sound very joy jumpish imo
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 8 users

hedrox

Regular
Screenshot 2024-10-25 at 08.06.28.png
 
  • Wow
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 21 users

hedrox

Regular
Screenshot 2024-10-25 at 08.07.27.png
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Thinking
Reactions: 21 users

Flight996

Regular
Christian Lusaka says "Not me; I was outside having a smoke when the $20m somehow vanished"

Donald Trump GIF by PBS NewsHour
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 12 users

BRICK

Where’s Zeebot 😶‍🌫️

BRICK

Where’s Zeebot 😶‍🌫️
ICSID update (I checked yesterday and it wasn't yet updated, so obviously updated overnight)

View attachment 71757


Sounds like there is dispute over documents to be produced as both parties have asked the Tribunal to decide on production of documents:

"The Tribunal has discretion to decide on the relevance and admissibility of the evidence adduced by the parties, and can exercise the power to summon further evidence at any stage of the case (Arbitration Rule 36(3)). If there is a dispute between the parties about the production of a document or category of documents, the Tribunal will decide that dispute, taking into account all relevant circumstances including:
  • the scope and timeliness of the request
  • the relevance and materiality of the documents requested
  • the burden of production
  • the basis of the objection to produce the document (Arbitration Rule 37).
This will be like super.
Cant access it till im 60
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 8 users

Flight996

Regular

Attachments

  • Fatman.png
    Fatman.png
    214.2 KB · Views: 41
Last edited:

Winenut

TROLLS LIVE IN BASEMENTS WITH THEIR MUMS
1729812048021.png


Mmmmmm......

Anti AVZ for a long time

Now wants to spill the beans on the ones involved with the $20m heist????

Being the DRC I'm guessing he's gone all pissy-pants because he didn't get what he considered to be his fair cut of the heist proceeds.....:rolleyes:
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Haha
Reactions: 21 users

j.l

Regular
ICSID update (I checked yesterday and it wasn't yet updated, so obviously updated overnight)

View attachment 71757


Sounds like there is dispute over documents to be produced as both parties have asked the Tribunal to decide on production of documents:

"The Tribunal has discretion to decide on the relevance and admissibility of the evidence adduced by the parties, and can exercise the power to summon further evidence at any stage of the case (Arbitration Rule 36(3)). If there is a dispute between the parties about the production of a document or category of documents, the Tribunal will decide that dispute, taking into account all relevant circumstances including:
  • the scope and timeliness of the request
  • the relevance and materiality of the documents requested
  • the burden of production
  • the basis of the objection to produce the document (Arbitration Rule 37).
I would anticipate that at every stage in the process where there's opportunity for dispute, it will be taken up with glee by our opponent. The longer this takes, the better in their eyes.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 5 users

Winenut

TROLLS LIVE IN BASEMENTS WITH THEIR MUMS
Not yet, my friend.
It would have been 2 years ago if AVZ had come through!:ROFLMAO::oops:
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 2 users

Dave Evans

Regular

Tshibangu is well known for his negative comments about AVZ. He rang Celestin Kibeya (on YouTube) after the recording of Celestin Kibeya taking Zijin’s bribe became public and defended Kibeya.

Then there was the staged arrest where he was supposedly arrested but not charged and he used his reply to the fake arrest to back Cominiere and make accusations against AVZ.

This is obviously another scam arrest as he has clearly showed his hand many times in the past. It definitely looks like this is another case of the DRC putting out bullshit that only they are dumb enough to believe.

I’ve removed the links I provided in this post because this is obviously another clown show by this bloke and the DRC and rather than add to their bullshit, I look forward to the future findings of the ICC and ICSID.

Anyone who hasn’t yet realised the bullshit, lies and deception AVZ has had to deal with isn’t a genuine AVZ shareholder.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Wow
Reactions: 27 users

wombat74

Top 20
I would anticipate that at every stage in the process where there's opportunity for dispute, it will be taken up with glee by our opponent. The longer this takes, the better in their eyes.
Nigel needs to secure funding before DRC/China will take any of our legal threats seriously . Until then they are just waiting for AVZ to go broke . It really does narrow down what geo_au's jump for joy announcement could be . Secured funding would seem to be the only option up for grabs at this point .
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 12 users

Doc

Master of Quan
ICSID update (I checked yesterday and it wasn't yet updated, so obviously updated overnight)

View attachment 71757


Sounds like there is dispute over documents to be produced as both parties have asked the Tribunal to decide on production of documents:

"The Tribunal has discretion to decide on the relevance and admissibility of the evidence adduced by the parties, and can exercise the power to summon further evidence at any stage of the case (Arbitration Rule 36(3)). If there is a dispute between the parties about the production of a document or category of documents, the Tribunal will decide that dispute, taking into account all relevant circumstances including:
  • the scope and timeliness of the request
  • the relevance and materiality of the documents requested
  • the burden of production
  • the basis of the objection to produce the document (Arbitration Rule 37).

Loop Text GIF by xponentialdesign
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 2 users

Dave Evans

Regular
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 9 users
Top Bottom