After cominiere laughed about the provisional measures I don’t think it’s likely that AVZ would agree to a suspension of the proceedings. Our management knows the DRC is not trustworthy and the proceedings can only be stopped if the DRC follows their laws and give us a ML. A suspension with delay of the proceeding dates would be a shot in the own knee, because the proceedings could easily continue until the DRC really follow the rules and laws or a deal is done. Personally I think the DRC lawyers found a way against the measures or a way to delay the proceedings.Is it more likely that there is an agreement to suspend rather than an order to suspend in this case? Surely AVZ would have had fierce objections to the ordering of a suspension.
(3) The Tribunal shall give the parties the opportunity to make observations before ordering a suspension pursuant to paragraph (2).
Not surprised . Has been stall and delay tactics from day 1 of this sh1t fight . It's the only way they can defeat AVZ .I think it’s a delay tactic from the DRC.
c) a modified procedural calendar to take effect on resumption of the proceeding, if necessary.
That would also mean, if a final order really exist for measures, it’s suspended now.
After trading suspension the chance against the trading suspension is suspended. Ironically.
Cominiere were laughing because they were saying they weren't a party to the ICSID arbitration. But they are ruled by the MoP and the government. If the government have formalised something to discuss with AVZ to avoid proceedings going any further then maybe (just MAYBE) management is willing to see what can be done.After cominiere laughed about the provisional measures I don’t think it’s likely that AVZ would agree to a suspension of the proceedings. Our management knows the DRC is not trustworthy and the proceedings can only be stopped if the DRC follows their laws and give us a ML. A suspension with delay of the proceeding dates would be a shot in the own knee, because the proceedings could easily continue until the DRC really follow the rules and laws or a deal is done. Personally I think the DRC lawyers found a way against the measures or a way to delay the proceedings.
Get jonnno @jonnnono in there as wellNot neccessarily public criticism but I fully endorse full engagement and your 3rd and 4th points make a lot of sense
- Now would be a perfect opportunity for our federal government to build a relationship with the DRC and introduce an ambassador directly to the DRC
- Would be a perfect opportunity for Serge, Dr Casta, Ambassador Salmone & Balthazar to go over and do long form interviews or podcasts with someone like Kiki as well as another one of those small video documentaries of them at site and with the locals
Get jonnno @jonnnono in there as well
He is truly a champion for the good of the DRC
View attachment 56055
I think it’s a delay tactic from the DRC.
c) a modified procedural calendar to take effect on resumption of the proceeding, if necessary.
That would also mean, if a final order really exist for measures, it’s suspended now.
After trading suspension the chance against the trading suspension is suspended. Ironically.
Yeah i'll probably avoid taking anything on board from you, i'm sure you think all could be sorted if Management resigned, you are a troll and cocksuckaI think it’s a delay tactic from the DRC.
c) a modified procedural calendar to take effect on resumption of the proceeding, if necessary.
That would also mean, if a final order really exist for measures, it’s suspended now.
After trading suspension the chance against the trading suspension is suspended. Ironically.
Wouldn't AVZ have had to agree to the suspension though? I can't see Nigel taking the Nuclear option down ICSID and DRC going "Ok ok we are ready to talk" and Nigel just saying "Oh ok".
Surely, to suspend proceedings (that were going in our favour) he would have had agreed to suspend under certain minimum conditions?
This requires an official announcement from AVZ to explain the exact reason for and duration of the suspension. Right after Nigel works out how much cash bonus he receives for doing his fucking job obvs100% avz would have had to agree to suspension - arbitration courts don't work to serve the entity who is being shown to be corrupt - unless they have proven an arbitrator is biased it would have had to been accepted by avz
Yeah i'll probably avoid taking anything on board from you, i'm sure you think all could be sorted if Management resigned, you are a troll and cocksucka
Yeah it would have and so would your money.Beginning to wonder if this shitfuckery would’ve been over by now if MMGA muppets had been voted in.
I’ll see myself out
Still a profityeah it would be at about 15 cents a share
15c with no ML and the current sector sentiment would be a pipe-dream. Think <5c.Still a profit
2nd of Feb not 5th* Pigeons do take a while though.Surely the suspension means negotiations are taking place. Not sure why we have not had an update if suspension was imposed on the 5th - announcement surely incoming.