AVZ Discussion 2022
- Thread starter GazDix
- Start date
When comparing the inferred measurement of RD to CDL, the inferred measurement at CDL is actually bigger.
Does this mean CDL has the potenti to be bigger than RD? Or will that 173 CDL inferred be split into measured/indicated as more precise drilling happens? Possibily with upgrades?
Does this mean CDL has the potenti to be bigger than RD? Or will that 173 CDL inferred be split into measured/indicated as more precise drilling happens? Possibily with upgrades?
Attachments
I think I've answered my own question here.
Here we can see the maiden resource announcement early mid 2018 (I think).
Next we have the updated resource announcement. Late 2018 roughly.
And then an update in May 2021. The total has changed, but inferred has decreased, spreading amongst measured and indicated.
Of note is that the maiden inferred resource of RD was 112 vs CDL 173.
Why were no measured/indicated results included in the maiden resource ann?
Here we can see the maiden resource announcement early mid 2018 (I think).
Next we have the updated resource announcement. Late 2018 roughly.
And then an update in May 2021. The total has changed, but inferred has decreased, spreading amongst measured and indicated.
Of note is that the maiden inferred resource of RD was 112 vs CDL 173.
Why were no measured/indicated results included in the maiden resource ann?
Xerof
Have a Cigar 1975
Reminds me of the aggressors v AVZ - Aggressors have the long hair, watch to the end
obe wan
Regular
Because they need more drilling to be done to closes the spacings . They’ve drilled about 4000 meters, but they’ll need to drill more holes closing the gap between bores, which will send it into the ‘measured / indicated ‘ pigeon hole . I.e in short they need to provide further drilling to show that there’s actually material in the areas between bores and its not a big Swiss cheese
Last edited:
Hodlandwin69
Regular
Anyone able to go to the court case this morning? Would be very helpful!
JAG
Top 20
Anyone able to go to the court case this morning? Would be very helpful!
Xerof
Have a Cigar 1975
https://x.com/IgfRdc/status/1736874289289167320?s=20
The General Inspectorate of Finance welcomes the proposal of the President of the Republic to work for the creation of a FINANCIAL PROSECUTION in the DRC to better fight corruption and embezzlement of public funds.
The General Inspectorate of Finance welcomes the proposal of the President of the Republic to work for the creation of a FINANCIAL PROSECUTION in the DRC to better fight corruption and embezzlement of public funds.
Carlos Danger
Top 20
China trying to steal Manono doesn't bother me. What bothers me is that all the shit they are trying is so fucking stupid.
Clearly the ICC has jurisdiction. Just give up Cong you are embarrassing yourself.
Scoota30
Regular
"retains legal title to a 75% interest"
Xerof
Have a Cigar 1975
Patience grasshopper. I'm told on good authority that once the shitfuckery is put to bed, it could be at least 8 to 10 weeks to get to a position to lift the suspension, mainly in the form of a short form prospectus, but other ASX shitfuckery as well
Dave Evans
Regular
Considering the stooges latest embarrassing attempt to undermine AVZ and our BOD in the WA Supreme Court, a simple calculation shows that if you take away the four Chinese companies votes (Yibin, CATH, Huayou, Lithium Plus) the votes FOR our current BOD and AGAINST the stooges was actually 7 to 1 (not 2 to 1).
This was also reflected in the number of shareholders voting FOR our current BOD and AGAINST the stooges being 7 to 1
Last edited:
Underwaterdark
Regular
Letting things run their course over Dec and January, and leading in to Feb.
Maybe, in theory, we would be aiming for March/April re-listing?
BRICK
Top 20
8-10 weeks will be good to settle the nerves of a few nervous nellies.
Its gonna be one hell of an opening that day!
Similar threads
