Lifting of the notification on the purchase of arms: "China will continue to support the DRC in strengthening its security defense capacities", (ambassador)
Yeah the Chinese will support DRC until they strangle, suffocate and devour them.
AVZ Discussion 2022
- Thread starter GazDix
- Start date
Yeah the Chinese will support DRC until they strangle, suffocate and devour them.
Xerof
Flaming 1967
If it’s not a fake email, Deeland appear to be offering EUR0.96 per share for up to 50m, max 100k per individual parcel to German holders only.
That’s AUD 1.53 per share
Would some of our German participants like to contact them?, as I don’t trust JohnBro in any shape or form
Twitter has the emails posted
But very interesting if genuine
Of course it’s not farken genuine, but at least get a genuine German take a good look
That’s AUD 1.53 per share
Would some of our German participants like to contact them?, as I don’t trust JohnBro in any shape or form
Twitter has the emails posted
But very interesting if genuine
Of course it’s not farken genuine, but at least get a genuine German take a good look
Last edited:
Azzler
Top 20
I'm only vaguely following the sluethly that's been going on (more like vaguely understanding), could someone who gets it please put it into a nice dot point timeline for us dummies?
Here's what my few marbles have put together from the postings from the last few days... tell me where I'm wrong.
Class action fishing line was thrown out by a company who werent really backing it, and was instigated by nevarious people, not holders.
No real interest from holders, so the nerfarions set up a dummy or stealthed company (Deeland) to buy enough AVZ shares so they they could then call themselves holders to opt in to get the class action law firm to begin the class action. And they have had to offer such a high price to get enough sellers.
Is any of that right?
Here's what my few marbles have put together from the postings from the last few days... tell me where I'm wrong.
Class action fishing line was thrown out by a company who werent really backing it, and was instigated by nevarious people, not holders.
No real interest from holders, so the nerfarions set up a dummy or stealthed company (Deeland) to buy enough AVZ shares so they they could then call themselves holders to opt in to get the class action law firm to begin the class action. And they have had to offer such a high price to get enough sellers.
Is any of that right?
TheCount
Regular
Yep, nailed it.
TC.
JAG
Top 20
AVZ est déjà dans le social de notre population congolaise avant même la phase d'exploitation. | Kelly KANZEU KATUKU
AVZ est déjà dans le social de notre population congolaise avant même la phase d'exploitation. Seule la Gécamines à son époque pourrait l'égaler. voici le genre d'investisseurs don't la RDC a besoin pour son développement. Bravo AVZ. Ne baisse pas les bras, bât toi pour avoir bien de cause en ce...
Seeing dear Mr brown isn’t from Germany then we all should be able to email them and get the same reply. I bet we don’t.
And as an aside, isn’t the whole premise of the class action that investors weren’t aware of proceedings during a specific date range? Buying now voids that argument.
And greetings from Japan!
Carlos Danger
Top 20
Yeah I buy this. Their fishing expedition to gauge shareholder support for the class action started a few months earlier imo
TDITD
Top 20
@Azzler I reckon you have that summation of the share offer quite accurate, at least that's my thoughts on it all, oh shit so your probably wrong 
.
I love how this 'offer' is at $1.5 AUD equivalent. Of course, at that price anyone buying wants to make good $$$ on their investment too not a measly 30% ($1.95) they would be likely looking for 100's % .... let's face it you wouldn't offer DOUBLE the last closing price to only try and make 50%. Risk/Reward. So they value this at much closer to its true value than many AVZ holders, talking Dollars here.
They could be checking appetite here with a possibility for a hostile takeover via a Chinese led group
Honestly reeks of more desperation, why do this if Zijin, Cong, fEkhof and clowns are winning???
LOL unlucky chaps looks like you're out and even better you're running from justice, we know you dickheads read this site!!!
.I love how this 'offer' is at $1.5 AUD equivalent. Of course, at that price anyone buying wants to make good $$$ on their investment too not a measly 30% ($1.95) they would be likely looking for 100's % .... let's face it you wouldn't offer DOUBLE the last closing price to only try and make 50%. Risk/Reward. So they value this at much closer to its true value than many AVZ holders, talking Dollars here.
They could be checking appetite here with a possibility for a hostile takeover via a Chinese led group
Honestly reeks of more desperation, why do this if Zijin, Cong, fEkhof and clowns are winning???
LOL unlucky chaps looks like you're out and even better you're running from justice, we know you dickheads read this site!!!
They could be checking appetite here with a possibility for a hostile takeover via a Chinese led group@Azzler I reckon you have that summation of the share offer quite accurate, at least that's my thoughts on it all, oh shit so your probably wrong
I love how this 'offer' is at $1.5 AUD equivalent. Of course, at that price anyone buying wants to make good $$$ on their investment too not a measly 30% ($1.95) they would be likely looking for 100's % .... let's face it you wouldn't offer DOUBLE the last closing price to only try and make 50%. Risk/Reward. So they value this once up an running at much closer to its true value than many AVZ holders, talking Dollars here.
They could be checking appetite here with a possibility for a hostile takeover via a Chinese led group
Honestly reeks of more desperation, why do this if Zijin, Cong, fEkhof and clowns are winning???
LOL unlucky chaps looks like you're out and even better you're running from justice, we know you dickheads read this site!!!
Similar threads
