The following response was to address the above:I'm not seeing that in the report just this:
Despite holding 75% of the shares, the partner DATHOMIR was not, in spite of everything, able to mobilise the expected financing, but preferred, only two months after having benefited from the transfer of 5% of the shares of COMINIERE S.A., to sell 60% of the shares to AVZ International in violation of the provisions of the joint venture contract in its article 16 point (f) concerning its commitments and according to which, it could not transfer its shares before the date of the commercial production.
Hey Jag, I maybe missing something, but I don’t understand what you are saying.75 % GOOD LEGAL TITLE NIGEL!!!!
Another lie mother fucker and I know where you live...yes I am known for Doxing those who fuck me over!!!!!
Start court proceedings now against the BoD! I am not prepared to pay any of you MF's any more money in wages for such a piss ant job.
![]()
Is it me or are we not reading the same report?
The report has been available since April this year, why is AVZ only addressing it now? Maybe they feel the time is FINALLY right and the #FinalAssault Landry Meya was referring to. I could be wrong, but I hope Fatish has the backbone to turn this corruption around.
Yes, I read it the same way. We have 60% and still need to purchase the 15% to make it the 75% Not sure why all the panic all of a sudden?Sometimes I feel like I am one of the very few adults on here capable of thinking logically regarding AVZ. People here are letting their emotions run wild. AVZ 60% is not in question. It was an irrevocable transfer. It says it in the IGF report. This may come accross as condescending, but I am starting to get frustrated with what people are posting here.
View attachment 23633
That's how I read it, if we obtained the shares through illegal means then it can be revoked.We irrevocably own it through illegal means
Something doesn't sit right.
There is no panic left mate, just casual numbnessYes, I read it the same way. We have 60% and still need to purchase the 15% to make it the 75% Not sure why all the panic all of a sudden?
No offence DoubleA but can an illegal sale be irrevocable?Sometimes I feel like I am one of the very few adults on here capable of thinking logically regarding AVZ. People here are letting their emotions run wild. AVZ 60% is not in question. It was an irrevocable transfer. It says it in the IGF report. This may come accross as condescending, but I am starting to get frustrated with what people are posting here.
View attachment 23633
Mate ajn shares " Are his business " Jesus didn't you know that ? Nothing to see here.....Nothing to see here. Just like we 100% own 75%........Weeeell maybe.By the time this is all over Nige will have made another 500k to 1m in salary while we have been powerless in watching our share value destroyed.
No wonder Nigel has kept his AJN shares….
Time to write this one off for the year at least lads and ladettes. At this stage I’ll be stoked to get 50c a share back from here…..
Bah Humbug
We irrevocably own it through illegal means
Something doesn't sit right.
Please show me where in the IGF report said it can be revoked.That's how I read it, if we obtained the shares through illegal means then it can be revoked.
It doesn't say that it can be revoked but if the transfer was illegal surely it can be revoked. I hope that I'm wrong.Please show me where in the IGF report said it can be revoked.