No thx. Might as well fight till the end, even if that's $0.Give me that TO . Who's out of here for $1.50 ?
I just don't see it happening though, you'd have to have absolute certainty that it's coming to put your balls on the line and organise the roadshow based around that. Apparently even a Ministerial Decree doesn't mean shit from these guys.
I'm sure we're going to have some positive news coming into or from it but the only thing you would have enough certainty of would have to be coming from the company itself.
So in saying that it can't be SEZ or anything with the DRC as the source so whats left? Revised BFS? Original timeline wise we should have been expecting FID around now shouldn't we? That's putting the cart before the horse has even been conceived on what's happening to our timeline now though...
OR dare I say it........... They are going to present a TO offer to the more important larger holders?
nope, ML this week.For everyone out there who keeps commenting on the Roadshow, I think you all need to have a good read of @Sammy_da_Smile’s post…. It gives the best description of what’s been happening that I’ve seen.
In addition to that, I doubt there’s much chance of getting the ML while the ownership issues remain unresolved in the courts. Surface rights (PR & PE) have to be determined before they can be paid and before a ML can be issued.
Only reason for Roadshows in my opinion is to explain the above, and also try and prevent shareholder revolt against the BOD and executives which would cause chaos and embarrassment for the company on a stage that will be viewed internationally.
See that @Winenut(s) no swearing!
Which post of Sammy_da_Smile’s are you referring to?For everyone out there who keeps commenting on the Roadshow, I think you all need to have a good read of @Sammy_da_Smile’s post…. It gives the best description of what’s been happening that I’ve seen.
In addition to that, I doubt there’s much chance of getting the ML while the ownership issues remain unresolved in the courts. Surface rights (PR & PE) have to be determined before they can be paid and before a ML can be issued.
Only reason for Roadshows in my opinion is to explain the above, and also try and prevent shareholder revolt against the BOD and executives which would cause chaos and embarrassment for the company on a stage that will be viewed internationally.
See that @Winenut(s) no swearing!
Agreed.nope, ML this week.
Ditto, I want outYeah I'll take that, I was in this for the long haul but so far the longest stage of the haul has been suspension.
I'd be happy, ATO would be happy...
Hi DiscoDanNZI just don't see it happening though, you'd have to have absolute certainty that it's coming to put your balls on the line and organise the roadshow based around that. Apparently even a Ministerial Decree doesn't mean shit from these guys.
I'm sure we're going to have some positive news coming into or from it but the only thing you would have enough certainty of would have to be coming from the company itself.
So in saying that it can't be SEZ or anything with the DRC as the source so whats left? Revised BFS? Original timeline wise we should have been expecting FID around now shouldn't we? That's putting the cart before the horse has even been conceived on what's happening to our timeline now though...
OR dare I say it........... They are going to present a TO offer to the more important larger holders?
Hi DiscoDanNZ
Re: OR dare I say it........... They are going to present a TO offer to the more important larger holders?
I think the company cannot sit on that sort of price sensitive news, and release it at a roadshow for selected shareholders only. The company is obligated to release it at the earliest possible opportunity to all shareholders. To do otherwise is a breach of its continuous disclosure obligations.
Cheers
F
Which would also mean they couldn’t release anything of substance really for the roadshows… so it’s either we’re getting good announcements this week or they’re going to try console you big dogs
I’m interested in, the political factions.
For example: A mining minister issued a decree. Who is she allied with? Certainly
Unfortunately they certainly can mate. A few years ago I had a call on santos wich ran out a couple of months before the agm at the agm. they told us at the agm that they had been approached for a takeover at 4.50 some months before but rejected it. Obviously lost a shit load of money high 6 figures. So rang lawyers and they basically said yeah it's shit but fuck all you can do about it. Dirty filthy pricks.Hi DiscoDanNZ
Re: OR dare I say it........... They are going to present a TO offer to the more important larger holders?
I think the company cannot sit on that sort of price sensitive news, and release it at a roadshow for selected shareholders only. The company is obligated to release it at the earliest possible opportunity to all shareholders. To do otherwise is a breach of its continuous disclosure obligations.
Cheers
F
I’d take it too at this point.Give me that TO . Who's out of here for $1.50 ?
Give me that TO . Who's out of here for $1.50 ?
Whatever is the trigger for the RS, the trigger will be announced via ASX this week, or 31/10 at latest. Maybe not a TO, maybe a JV, e.g. USA company, Rio ... maybe for CDL, maybe for RD also with a renegotiation for CATH to take < 24% ? A strategic JV could confirm the prospect of "ML soon" (LOL) and see us trading? IMO FIIK LOL. GLTAH.Good point, knock that of the list of potentials then. Unless they are finalising the details for a water tight offer which is arriving this week? Maybe just put that idea in the bottom drawer for now.
As my reply to Flight996 above, if it's not a take offer then that's just one less possible reason for the roadshow. Were fast running out of reasons for the roadshow then aren't we.
Maybe it's just a big group hug and canape eating contest to spend money on the big boys while the company still has open bank accounts at their disposal.
At the end of the day no one fucken knows shit and hasn't had a clue for 24 weeks now...
When's the first shareholders meeting again?