MoneyBags1348
Top 20
Bags, you should have heard them out. I also got a call and they offered to buy my shares for $5 š«„š«„š«„š«„
Not funny X, Iām deleting the number from the threads and just keeping a photo of itā¦. Very Sus mate
Bags, you should have heard them out. I also got a call and they offered to buy my shares for $5 š«„š«„š«„š«„
Absolutely... Tommy enquired, they felt like they needed to release info on it because of that...This announcement is essentially just a response to the AFR query?
Iāve read, re-read, and read again that word-salad abomination of an announcement.
Itās almost like someone through some duck entrails at google translate and this is what popped out the end. FMD.
Caution: What follows is a madmanās reverse-engineered interpretation of said word salad. Read at your own risk.
Now thatās out of the way, I think I can see AVZ painting a positive picture here:
Thing 1. Z/ICC Arbitration: The next action is for the ICC to determine whether it has *jurisdiction* to hear the case. AVZ think the ICC does not have jurisdiction and, if correct, the case will not proceed to the next step (of ābeing heard on its meritsā).
Thing 2. DRC Tribunal: AVZ are seemingly so confident on this one they did not even send the office coffee boy to stand in the corner of the hearing room and play pocket billiards for a few hours. What the shit, Batman? Either that or they were binge-watching Doomsday Preppers and forgot to put the alarm on - dunno which.
Anyhoo, AVZ are saying āwe donāt give a fuck - itās not a properly constituted arbitral tribunalā, presumably because the dispute mechanisms are laid out in detail in other legal documents (JV agreement or somesuch thing). In other words, āuntil such time as one of these numbnuts from Dathomir invokes a proper dispute with us, itās ours thanks all the sameā.
So yeah, I think itās positive. If correct, it might explain the vibe about being close to the ML, but who the fuck knowsā¦
Oh, and to AVZ management: Hi. I hereby volunteer to write your announcements from this point forward. Iāll write some nice words that are both syntactically correct and logically structured. Then Iāll hand it over Wino and Moneybags who will add the kind of verbs and adjectives that would make a soldier blush. These announcements, so authored, will then be both understandable and entertaining. You know it makes sense.
Maybe. Have an other read and share your thoughtsā¦The funny thing is I think you got the first part wrong Mr I
Now Iām going to have to re-read it![]()
MB if possible can you please drop me a private message on the call you received? I canāt see how to initiate a message to youā¦Iāll see what I can dig upā¦.
Funny thing only just happened, can you believe I just got a call from the Chinese Embassy!!
Unbelievable but trueā¦. I hung up but am posting the number here below:
After reading the announcement 100 times, I think your interpretation of point 1 is on the money.Iāve read, re-read, and read again that word-salad abomination of an announcement.
Itās almost like someone threw some duck entrails at google translate and this is what popped out the end. FMD.
Caution: What follows is a madmanās reverse-engineered interpretation of said word salad. Read at your own risk.
Now thatās out of the way, I think I can see AVZ painting a positive picture here:
Thing 1. Z/ICC Arbitration: The next action is for the ICC to determine whether it has *jurisdiction* to hear the case. AVZ think the ICC does not have jurisdiction and, if correct, the case will not proceed to the next step (of ābeing heard on its meritsā).
Thing 2. DRC Tribunal: AVZ are seemingly so confident on this one they did not even send the office coffee boy to stand in the corner of the hearing room and play pocket billiards for a few hours. What the shit, Batman? Either that or they were binge-watching Doomsday Preppers and forgot to put the alarm on - dunno which.
Anyhoo, AVZ are saying āwe donāt give a fuck - itās not a properly constituted arbitral tribunalā, presumably because the dispute mechanisms are laid out in detail in other legal documents (JV agreement or somesuch thing). In other words, āuntil such time as one of these numbnuts from Dathomir invokes a proper dispute with us, itās ours thanks all the sameā.
So yeah, I think itās positive. If correct, it might explain the vibe about being close to the ML, but who the fuck knowsā¦
Oh, and to AVZ management: Hi. I hereby volunteer to write your announcements from this point forward. Iāll write some nice words that are both syntactically correct and logically structured. Then Iāll hand it over Wino and Moneybags who will add the kind of verbs and adjectives that would make a soldier blush. These announcements, so authored, will then be both understandable and entertaining. You know it makes sense.
Correct and my left nut is savedIāve read, re-read, and read again that word-salad abomination of an announcement.
Itās almost like someone threw some duck entrails at google translate and this is what popped out the end. FMD.
Caution: What follows is a madmanās reverse-engineered interpretation of said word salad. Read at your own risk.
Now thatās out of the way, I think I can see AVZ painting a positive picture here:
Thing 1. Z/ICC Arbitration: The next action is for the ICC to determine whether it has *jurisdiction* to hear the case. AVZ think the ICC does not have jurisdiction and, if correct, the case will not proceed to the next step (of ābeing heard on its meritsā).
Thing 2. DRC Tribunal: AVZ are seemingly so confident on this one they did not even send the office coffee boy to stand in the corner of the hearing room and play pocket billiards for a few hours. What the shit, Batman? Either that or they were binge-watching Doomsday Preppers and forgot to put the alarm on - dunno which.
Anyhoo, AVZ are saying āwe donāt give a fuck - itās not a properly constituted arbitral tribunalā, presumably because the dispute mechanisms are laid out in detail in other legal documents (JV agreement or somesuch thing). In other words, āuntil such time as one of these numbnuts from Dathomir invokes a proper dispute with us, itās ours thanks all the sameā.
So yeah, I think itās positive. If correct, it might explain the vibe about being close to the ML, but who the fuck knowsā¦
Oh, and to AVZ management: Hi. I hereby volunteer to write your announcements from this point forward. Iāll write some nice words that are both syntactically correct and logically structured. Then Iāll hand it over Wino and Moneybags who will add the kind of verbs and adjectives that would make a soldier blush. These announcements, so authored, will then be both understandable and entertaining. You know it makes sense.
Correct and my left nut is saved
Thing 1. Z/ICC Arbitration: The next action is for the ICC to determine whether it has *jurisdiction* to hear the case. AVZ think the ICC does not have jurisdiction and, if correct, the case will not proceed to the next step (of ābeing heard on its meritsā).
![]()
Fuxk she goes alright, fair few deep didnāt even need to squintJust for you @Winenut @MoneyBags1348 @Frank @TDITD
When you have too much tonight and posted just look here.....love ya's
View attachment 19491
might explain the squinty eyesIt' a non event . Always has been . Cong just playing with himself .He's sitting in a corner beating off all by his lonesome
.
What's this about Jag? Care to elaborate?Who has their finger in this fuckin PIE!!!!! Guess fucking WHO
View attachment 19492
Maybe. Have an other read and share your thoughtsā¦
Iāve read, re-read, and read again that word-salad abomination of an announcement.
Itās almost like someone threw some duck entrails at google translate and this is what popped out the end. FMD.
Caution: What follows is a madmanās reverse-engineered interpretation of said word salad. Read at your own risk.
Now thatās out of the way, I think I can see AVZ painting a positive picture here:
Thing 1. Z/ICC Arbitration: The next action is for the ICC to determine whether it has *jurisdiction* to hear the case. AVZ think the ICC does not have jurisdiction and, if correct, the case will not proceed to the next step (of ābeing heard on its meritsā).
Thing 2. DRC Tribunal: AVZ are seemingly so confident on this one they did not even send the office coffee boy to stand in the corner of the hearing room and play pocket billiards for a few hours. What the shit, Batman? Either that or they were binge-watching Doomsday Preppers and forgot to put the alarm on - dunno which.
Anyhoo, AVZ are saying āwe donāt give a fuck - itās not a properly constituted arbitral tribunalā, presumably because the dispute mechanisms are laid out in detail in other legal documents (JV agreement or somesuch thing). In other words, āuntil such time as one of these numbnuts from Dathomir invokes a proper dispute with us, itās ours thanks all the sameā.
So yeah, I think itās positive. If correct, it might explain the vibe about being close to the ML, but who the fuck knowsā¦
Oh, and to AVZ management: Hi. I hereby volunteer to write your announcements from this point forward. Iāll write some nice words that are both syntactically correct and logically structured. Then Iāll hand it over Wino and Moneybags who will add the kind of verbs and adjectives that would make a soldier blush. These announcements, so authored, will then be both understandable and entertaining. You know it makes sense.
During the Question/Answer session at the Chatham house Royal Institute of International Affairs conference, I hope someone asked Felix about the DRC Manono Lithium asset as the world is aware of it.
View attachment 19472
View attachment 19469
Just for you @Winenut @MoneyBags1348 @Frank @TDITD
When you have too much tonight and posted just look here.....love ya's
View attachment 19491