Old ha I was thinking of faxing something last week , just moved on from homing pigeon anyone for a home made vodkaThat sounds ok Beisha, but let's say we've got a group of 30 plus can you DM/PM all of them at once so that they all know what we're talking about or can you only talk to one at a time? I.T is not my strength, showing my age now.
I prefer the term "ballbag" but each to their own .......... PoCockThe word you're looking for is ballsack I believe , but also pass
The beauty of this forum was supposed to be "the (community) majority speaks".
It is obvious that for some fucked up reason that is not working and THAT will be the end of this place.
HaHaHa ,prick , I love itI prefer the term "ballbag" but each to their own .......... PoCock![]()
Lay down with dogs, wake up with fleas
Yes but if everyone stuck their head in the sand these posters would not be reported and posts not removed. That would embolden them to post more and more unabated. Ignoring weeds doesn’t help, gotta pull the bastards out roots and all.If only there was a function that would allow users to put people on ignore. Big oversight.
I agree if everyone stuck their head in the sand we all wouldnt know what is going on with AVZ..??????Yes but if everyone stuck their head in the sand these posters would not be reported and posts not removed. That would embolden them to post more and more unabated. Ignoring weeds doesn’t help, gotta pull the bastards out roots and all.
I tend to disagree in this scenario. The guy is basically a professional troll. I'd say responding is fertiliser for weeds. It's easier to put someone on ignore than it is to go and start an entirely new forum from scratch. I have had him on ignore on hotcrapper for at least a year. I am seeing people go insane just trying to argue with him.Yes but if everyone stuck their head in the sand these posters would not be reported and posts not removed. That would embolden them to post more and more unabated. Ignoring weeds doesn’t help, gotta pull the bastards out roots and all.
You misread my post entirely. I’m not talking about responding. Never said anything about responding, I’ve pointedly said don’t respond in the past. Point was if you ignore a poster you can’t report a poster, not enough people report the posts stay up. SimplesI tend to disagree in this scenario. The guy is basically a professional troll. I'd say responding is fertiliser for weeds. It's easier to put someone on ignore than it is to go and start an entirely new forum from scratch. I have had him on ignore on hotcrapper for at least a year. I am seeing people go insane just trying to argue with him.
There couldn't be more than 3 people on this website that think he has anything useful to say. So responding isn't providing any benefit to anyone.
Having said that. Obviously zeebot should have banned him instantly. Bizarre.
What year was this MEDIA ARTICLE published..????
They really are dumb as dog shit for thinking they can get away with this, i just shakes my head.
They are trying.They really are dumb as dog shit for thinking they can get away with this, i just shakes my head.