AVZ Discussion 2022
- Thread starter GazDix
- Start date
Xerof
Biding my Time 1971
Bin59
Regular
The FOCAC (Forum on China-Africa Co-Operation) summit is being held between 4 - 6 September in Beijing (same dates as Africa Down Under). As critical minerals will be discussed this year perhaps the Minister of Mines will attend this with the President rather than attending the Africa Down Under event.
thefinancialanalyst.net
By Felicity Hurley / August 29, 2024
As the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) gears up for its 2024 summit, set for September 4 to 6 in Beijing, anticipation is building around the potential outcomes of this significant event. Since its inception in 2000, FOCAC has provided a vital platform for dialogue and collaboration between China and African nations, evolving into a cornerstone of China’s engagement with the continent. The summit is expected to attract a diverse array of African leaders, reminiscent of the 2018 gathering that saw over 50 heads of state and representatives in attendance.
FOCAC’s thematic focus areas—health, agriculture, trade, investment, infrastructure, and green development—reflect the multifaceted nature of China’s commitments to Africa. Past summits have highlighted substantial financial pledges, such as the $60 billion in 2018 and the $40 billion in 2021.
These figures underscore the scale of China’s involvement in Africa and the importance of fostering development across various sectors. However, a critical area that has historically been overlooked in FOCAC discussions is the mining sector, particularly the strategic importance of critical minerals.
Mining represents a significant component of African economies, accounting for about 70 percent of total exports and roughly 28 percent of GDP. With Africa holding approximately 30 percent of the world’s mineral resources, including essential materials for the green energy transition, the continent’s potential for economic growth through mining is immense. China’s heavy reliance on African minerals—comprising nearly 90 percent of its imports from the continent—highlights the strategic interest both parties have in this sector.
Despite the clear economic and strategic value of mining, FOCAC has not adequately addressed the role of critical minerals. This oversight is particularly striking as the demand for these minerals is expected to double by 2030, driven by the global shift towards clean energy technologies. China’s dominance in the processing and manufacturing of critical minerals places it in a pivotal position within the global supply chain, raising concerns among Western nations about over-reliance on Chinese resources.
In response to this growing competition, the United States and the European Union have initiated partnerships aimed at diversifying supply chains for critical minerals. The formation of the Minerals Security Partnership and recent tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles signal a concerted effort to curb China’s influence. However, these initiatives have yet to translate into substantial investments or concrete actions on the ground in Africa.
In contrast, Chinese companies have been proactive in securing mining interests across the continent. With over $1 billion invested in lithium projects in Zimbabwe alone, China’s swift actions underline its commitment to establishing a foothold in Africa’s mining sector. The proposed $1 billion refurbishment of the Tazara Railway, which connects Zambia’s Copperbelt to the port of Dar es Salaam, exemplifies China’s strategy to enhance logistical capabilities for mineral transport. This initiative directly competes with the Lobito Corridor, which aims to facilitate mineral transport to European and North American markets.
As African nations strive to transition from being mere suppliers of raw materials to developing local processing capabilities, they are asserting their interests more aggressively. Countries like Zimbabwe and Namibia have implemented bans on the export of raw critical materials, while the DRC and Zambia are collaborating on the development of electric vehicle batteries using locally sourced minerals. These moves reflect a growing desire among African nations to capture more value from their natural resources.
The upcoming FOCAC summit presents a crucial opportunity for African nations to collectively voice their demands regarding the mining sector and critical minerals. By advocating for fairer terms, increased investment in local processing, and alignment with Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) standards, African leaders can leverage this platform to ensure their development priorities are respected.
While the integration of critical minerals into FOCAC’s agenda remains uncertain, it is clear that the relationship between Africa and China will continue to evolve in response to global demand for these resources. Effective dialogue and collaboration will be essential for African nations to navigate this complex landscape, ensuring that their interests are safeguarded as they engage with one of their most significant partners. The stakes are high, and the time for proactive measures is now.
FOCAC 2024: Will Critical Minerals Finally Take Center Stage in Beijing?
As the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) gears up for its 2024 summit, set for September 4 to 6 in Beijing, anticipation is building around the potential outcomes of this significant event.
thefinancialanalyst.net
FOCAC 2024: Will Critical Minerals Finally Take Center Stage in Beijing?
By Felicity Hurley / August 29, 2024
As the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) gears up for its 2024 summit, set for September 4 to 6 in Beijing, anticipation is building around the potential outcomes of this significant event. Since its inception in 2000, FOCAC has provided a vital platform for dialogue and collaboration between China and African nations, evolving into a cornerstone of China’s engagement with the continent. The summit is expected to attract a diverse array of African leaders, reminiscent of the 2018 gathering that saw over 50 heads of state and representatives in attendance.
FOCAC’s thematic focus areas—health, agriculture, trade, investment, infrastructure, and green development—reflect the multifaceted nature of China’s commitments to Africa. Past summits have highlighted substantial financial pledges, such as the $60 billion in 2018 and the $40 billion in 2021.
These figures underscore the scale of China’s involvement in Africa and the importance of fostering development across various sectors. However, a critical area that has historically been overlooked in FOCAC discussions is the mining sector, particularly the strategic importance of critical minerals.
Mining represents a significant component of African economies, accounting for about 70 percent of total exports and roughly 28 percent of GDP. With Africa holding approximately 30 percent of the world’s mineral resources, including essential materials for the green energy transition, the continent’s potential for economic growth through mining is immense. China’s heavy reliance on African minerals—comprising nearly 90 percent of its imports from the continent—highlights the strategic interest both parties have in this sector.
Despite the clear economic and strategic value of mining, FOCAC has not adequately addressed the role of critical minerals. This oversight is particularly striking as the demand for these minerals is expected to double by 2030, driven by the global shift towards clean energy technologies. China’s dominance in the processing and manufacturing of critical minerals places it in a pivotal position within the global supply chain, raising concerns among Western nations about over-reliance on Chinese resources.
In response to this growing competition, the United States and the European Union have initiated partnerships aimed at diversifying supply chains for critical minerals. The formation of the Minerals Security Partnership and recent tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles signal a concerted effort to curb China’s influence. However, these initiatives have yet to translate into substantial investments or concrete actions on the ground in Africa.
In contrast, Chinese companies have been proactive in securing mining interests across the continent. With over $1 billion invested in lithium projects in Zimbabwe alone, China’s swift actions underline its commitment to establishing a foothold in Africa’s mining sector. The proposed $1 billion refurbishment of the Tazara Railway, which connects Zambia’s Copperbelt to the port of Dar es Salaam, exemplifies China’s strategy to enhance logistical capabilities for mineral transport. This initiative directly competes with the Lobito Corridor, which aims to facilitate mineral transport to European and North American markets.
As African nations strive to transition from being mere suppliers of raw materials to developing local processing capabilities, they are asserting their interests more aggressively. Countries like Zimbabwe and Namibia have implemented bans on the export of raw critical materials, while the DRC and Zambia are collaborating on the development of electric vehicle batteries using locally sourced minerals. These moves reflect a growing desire among African nations to capture more value from their natural resources.
The upcoming FOCAC summit presents a crucial opportunity for African nations to collectively voice their demands regarding the mining sector and critical minerals. By advocating for fairer terms, increased investment in local processing, and alignment with Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) standards, African leaders can leverage this platform to ensure their development priorities are respected.
While the integration of critical minerals into FOCAC’s agenda remains uncertain, it is clear that the relationship between Africa and China will continue to evolve in response to global demand for these resources. Effective dialogue and collaboration will be essential for African nations to navigate this complex landscape, ensuring that their interests are safeguarded as they engage with one of their most significant partners. The stakes are high, and the time for proactive measures is now.
Carlos Danger
Top 20
I’ve explained this numerous times. The post I have replied to spells it out in detail. I know you understand what happened so stop with your games.
Bin59
Regular
Société MANONO LITHIUM SAS : Travaux de la construction des sites industrielles d'exploitation et de concentration
采选工业场地建筑工程施工招标公告 Avis d’appel d’offres - Travaux de la construction des sites industrielles d'exploitation et de concentration 马诺诺锂业简易股份有限公司，商业和动产登记证书号：NCD/LSH/RCCM/23-B-01276，国家身份识别号：N05-B0500-N27040M，税号：A2315586S，注册地址：刚果民主共和国卢本巴希市卢本巴希镇Annexe街区Ribambelle街道11B。因公司业务开展需要，现对采选工业场地建筑工程施工发布招标公告。 La...
www.radiookapi.net
The latest Tender notice 29/08/24
Company MANONO LITHIUM SAS: Construction work on industrial exploitation and concentration sites
Published on Thu, 29/08/2024 - 11:23 | Modified on Thu, 29/08/2024 - 11:23
FACEBOOK TWITTER linkedIn WordPress Messenger WhatsApp Skype Viber Messagepinterest e-mail
采选工业场地建筑工程施工标公告
Tender Notice - Construction work on industrial operating and concentration sites
I mean der, how much more time does the ICC need to understand that the DRC and its agencies, particularly Cominiere have no intention whatsoever of complying with any arbiter's resolutions or orders.
In conjunction with the corrupt DRC govt and its equally corrupt agencies, Zijin Mining continues to press ahead with with immunity in constructing a mine on stolen ground right under the noses of both the ICC and ICSID.
It is well past time for the arbiters to award AVZ the already established penalties against the DRC for non-compliance with its interim orders, which today (1 Sept 2024) stand at approximately AU$120 million.
Happy fathers day.
F
Last edited:
Bin59
Regular
Flight
Not sure what I did above so repost here!
I have been trying work out why Zijin is displaying blatant disregard for the ICC,ICSID interim orders. Why? Because they can produce JV documents that say they are majority owners of CDL! Zijin will have no liability. The stupid f$cks in the DRC will get sued for billions by Zijin for breach of contract for unlawfully selling what belongs to AVZ.
I have been trying work out why Zijin is displaying blatant disregard for the ICC,ICSID interim orders. Why? Because they can produce JV documents that say they are majority owners of CDL! Zijin will have no liability. The stupid f$cks in the DRC will get sued for billions by Zijin for breach of contract for unlawfully selling what belongs to AVZ.
Mr_Tones83
Regular
Funnily enough Zijin have publicly stated that they had done their due diligence on Cominiere and Manono. So there may be potential to have a case of them attempting to sue thrown out on this admission.
If they did DD as they claimed, they would certainly have known about the RoFR that AVZ had over Cominiere's shareholding in the Dathcom JV.
Response to Africa Intelligence Article
"Jin Cheng Mining conducted the required due diligence on the seller (Cominiere) and the asset.
As a globally responsible mining company, Zijin Mining affirms that it has diligently complied with all legal and regulatory requirements throughout the processes outlined in the article."
Similar threads
