AVZ Discussion 2022

Frank

Top 20
1723421849388.png



1723421443059.png

1723421485575.png

1723421559508.png




1723421629810.png

1723421670534.png



1723422200612.png


1723422238045.png



1723422581204.png


1723422603958.png

 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 29 users

SilentOne

Regular

What people and countries forget that if you sign up / have membership to International Bodies such as the ICC & ICSID its all in - you cant simply ignore ruling due to the fact that it doesn't suit you - if you want to deal with the international community then you simply need to be an adult about things and put your big boy pants on.

The DRC want to have their cake and eat it - they are happy to take/embezzle international investment/money but sook when action is taken against them and claim to be the victim when their hands get caught in the cookie jar.

The corruption is called out for what it is - inaction is an endorsement of the corruption that is currently occurring. This whole spectacle clearly sits at Felix's feet.

I am so fed up with the DRC and their shenanigans that talking to them seems to be a waste of time - I am very much looking forward to them being formally reprimanded by the ICC & ICSID and called out for their corrupt behavior. Financial penalties/compensation need to be awarded to AVZ.

You dont open your house to thieves and complain about being robbed and thats what Felix has done with his government.

There is no doubt that there are many honorable people in the DRC we just need to support them where we can.

Regards,

SilentOne
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 41 users

Winenut

Go AVZ!
Would it be worth sending in a complaint via "Feedback" to the AFR about Tom Richardson? Surely as a prestigious media outlet, they would be interested in ensuring their journalists and tainted by money/bias. I think it's absolutely clear that Tom Richardson has some form of external influence/payments ti cause him to seemingly attack the company like he does.

My problem is I'm not as well versed in his history against the company, and can't connect all the dots to present to the AFR to have them take me seriously.

Here's the link: https://www.afr.com/contact-us/support

Any takers?
Have done it on a number of occassions in the past.....never received any acknowledgement from the AFR
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8 users

Spikerama

Regular
Have done it on a number of occassions in the past.....never received any acknowledgement from the AFR
You're better off making a complaint to the Australian Press Council; as they handle complaints over standards and breaches of legitimacy, fairness and accuracy.

Kind of like an ombudsman for the press.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 14 users

Samus

Top 20
What people and countries forget that if you sign up / have membership to International Bodies such as the ICC & ICSID its all in - you cant simply ignore ruling due to the fact that it doesn't suit you - if you want to deal with the international community then you simply need to be an adult about things and put your big boy pants on.

The DRC want to have their cake and eat it - they are happy to take/embezzle international investment/money but sook when action is taken against them and claim to be the victim when their hands get caught in the cookie jar.

The corruption is called out for what it is - inaction is an endorsement of the corruption that is currently occurring. This whole spectacle clearly sits at Felix's feet.

I am so fed up with the DRC and their shenanigans that talking to them seems to be a waste of time - I am very much looking forward to them being formally reprimanded by the ICC & ICSID and called out for their corrupt behavior. Financial penalties/compensation need to be awarded to AVZ.

You dont open your house to thieves and complain about being robbed and thats what Felix has done with his government.

There is no doubt that there are many honorable people in the DRC we just need to support them where we can.

Regards,

SilentOne
On exactly the same page here, but it's a sham how the arbitration processes take so long with a time sensitive issue such as this.
Already the Chinese parasites have moved in to the point where it's impossible to extract them.
All we can do is wait now not only for the various rulings but for the inevitable multiple appeals the China backed Congolese criminals will lodge. Years of shit ahead.
I hope we can push things like emergency orders to the limits and rack up a good amount of fines which are payable to force the DRC's hand in order for them to approach us before time with with some sort of fair settlement resolution.
I'm my view management should cut off all negotiations and push ICC/ICSID hard until they are forced to come to the party of their own volition and until such time ignore their bullshit, lies and stalling tactics except to counter the disinformation they'll spew.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 22 users

Roon

Regular
What people and countries forget that if you sign up / have membership to International Bodies such as the ICC & ICSID its all in - you cant simply ignore ruling due to the fact that it doesn't suit you - if you want to deal with the international community then you simply need to be an adult about things and put your big boy pants on.

The DRC want to have their cake and eat it - they are happy to take/embezzle international investment/money but sook when action is taken against them and claim to be the victim when their hands get caught in the cookie jar.

The corruption is called out for what it is - inaction is an endorsement of the corruption that is currently occurring. This whole spectacle clearly sits at Felix's feet.

I am so fed up with the DRC and their shenanigans that talking to them seems to be a waste of time - I am very much looking forward to them being formally reprimanded by the ICC & ICSID and called out for their corrupt behavior. Financial penalties/compensation need to be awarded to AVZ.

You dont open your house to thieves and complain about being robbed and thats what Felix has done with his government.

There is no doubt that there are many honorable people in the DRC we just need to support them where we can.

Regards,

SilentOne
The enforcability is a concern though, not to mention the additional years and years that this would take.

Even after a US court in 2021 confirmed the US600m DigOil ICC judgement from 2018, opening the possibility of DRC assets in the states being seized, where are we now?

Answer: DigOil hasn't received a cent yet, nearly 7 years on. Yet the international community is still dealing with DRC anyway, big boy pants or not.

In a judgement that could possibly be five times the size of that one, or even more, what's the likelihood of a speedy resolution and an actual delivery of those funds?

How many here will have passed on by the time we get funds, if ever?

Sure the ICSID might have some better leverage than the ICC towards enforcement, and the World Bank connection is useful given the DRC's needs, but let's not kid ourselves that this would be a timely or smooth process.

I guess we could leverage a huge judgement payment into some kind of a deal, but again this would be years and years away from fruition if having to await a conclusion of all our arbitration cases.
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 9 users

SilentOne

Regular
The enforcability is a concern though, not to mention the additional years and years that this would take.

Even after a US court in 2021 confirmed the US600m DigOil ICC judgement from 2018, opening the possibility of DRC assets in the states being seized, where are we now?

Answer: DigOil hasn't received a cent yet, nearly 7 years on. Yet the international community is still dealing with DRC anyway, big boy pants or not.

In a judgement that could possibly be five times the size of that one, or even more, what's the likelihood of a speedy resolution and an actual delivery of those funds?

How many here will have passed on by the time we get funds, if ever?

Sure the ICSID might have some better leverage than the ICC towards enforcement, and the World Bank connection is useful given the DRC's needs, but let's not kid ourselves that this would be a timely or smooth process.

I guess we could leverage a huge judgement payment into some kind of a deal, but again this would be years and years away from fruition if having to await a conclusion of all our arbitration cases.
Roon,

I tend to be a Glass Half Full type of guy - ICSID outcomes for both Tanzania and Gambia fills me with hope.

I dont believe it will drag on for years.

Regards,

SilentOne
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 17 users

Samus

Top 20
The enforcability is a concern though, not to mention the additional years and years that this would take.

Even after a US court in 2021 confirmed the US600m DigOil ICC judgement from 2018, opening the possibility of DRC assets in the states being seized, where are we now?

Answer: DigOil hasn't received a cent yet, nearly 7 years on. Yet the international community is still dealing with DRC anyway, big boy pants or not.

In a judgement that could possibly be five times the size of that one, or even more, what's the likelihood of a speedy resolution and an actual delivery of those funds?

How many here will have passed on by the time we get funds, if ever?

Sure the ICSID might have some better leverage than the ICC towards enforcement, and the World Bank connection is useful given the DRC's needs, but let's not kid ourselves that this would be a timely or smooth process.

I guess we could leverage a huge judgement payment into some kind of a deal, but again this would be years and years away from fruition if having to await a conclusion of all our arbitration cases.
See what's the alternative though Roon?
It seems that they need to be forced to take a position sooner than later.
After something like two and a half years of "negotiations" the ministry of Mines are officially saying they aren't undertaking any negotiations.
So negotiations until they come to the table voluntarily seem like a total waste of time which plays into Chinese hands.
AVZ has stated time and again that we're willing to negotiate.
We need a way to pressure them hard in the right direction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 15 users

oxxa23

Regular
The enforcability is a concern though, not to mention the additional years and years that this would take.

Even after a US court in 2021 confirmed the US600m DigOil ICC judgement from 2018, opening the possibility of DRC assets in the states being seized, where are we now?

Answer: DigOil hasn't received a cent yet, nearly 7 years on. Yet the international community is still dealing with DRC anyway, big boy pants or not.

In a judgement that could possibly be five times the size of that one, or even more, what's the likelihood of a speedy resolution and an actual delivery of those funds?

How many here will have passed on by the time we get funds, if ever?

Sure the ICSID might have some better leverage than the ICC towards enforcement, and the World Bank connection is useful given the DRC's needs, but let's not kid ourselves that this would be a timely or smooth process.

I guess we could leverage a huge judgement payment into some kind of a deal, but again this would be years and years away from fruition if having to await a conclusion of all our arbitration cases.
if ever i'm having too good a day i just come on here and read your posts roon...
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 25 users

Roon

Regular
See what's the alternative though Roon?
It seems that they need to be forced to take a position sooner than later.
After something like two and a half years of "negotiations" the ministry of Mines are officially saying they aren't undertaking any negotiations.
So negotiations until they come to the table voluntarily seem like a total waste of time which plays into Chinese hands.
AVZ has stated time and again that we're willing to negotiate.
We need a way to pressure them hard in the right direction.
Totally agree, we obviously need to push forward with ICSID and ICC. That's the only pressure point we've got.

My only dispute is with those who say we shouldn't compromise whatsoever and should await the eventual ICC/ICSID rulings. As if that's a simple pathway invariably leading to a positive outcome in some reasonable time frame.

I say keep pressing our arbitration cases with full vigor, up to the point where some deal might be possible that gets us a PE. Then we try to leverage that into a half-decent sale price to a major thats interested in a world class lithium deposit and that has the know-how and willingness to operate in this challenging jurisdiction. Might be a short list, but the upside is so high that I imagine we could find a suitor. If that takes some trade-offs or concessions then so be it. And to have any hope of getting there before I go grey(er), we need our licensing/ownership issues to be settled one way or the other.

Otherwise sure, if nobody comes to the table, then we go full ICSID and sit in for the long haul.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 20 users

Winenut

Go AVZ!
This is the original on the Mines site if anyone has a better way to translate than to type it into Google. See if it matches up with what's said in the English doc. Not sure if the above is just an English version that they released at the same time, as the stamps and signature appear to be original to each document... It does look like each one is authentically original.
View attachment 67908

Seems to be the concensus they are legit and there is both a French and an English version

Fucking completely contradicts this official statement below made a few weeks ago by the same organisation where they advise Felix they are having amicable discussions with AVZ and the case is being reviewed by experts


1723436905721.png


Fuck me..... you couldn't make this shit up :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Fire
Reactions: 14 users

cruiser51

Top 20
Totally agree, we obviously need to push forward with ICSID and ICC. That's the only pressure point we've got.

My only dispute is with those who say we shouldn't compromise whatsoever and should await the eventual ICC/ICSID rulings. As if that's a simple pathway invariably leading to a positive outcome in some reasonable time frame.

I say keep pressing our arbitration cases with full vigor, up to the point where some deal might be possible that gets us a PE. Then we try to leverage that into a half-decent sale price to a major thats interested in a world class lithium deposit and that has the know-how and willingness to operate in this challenging jurisdiction. Might be a short list, but the upside is so high that I imagine we could find a suitor. If that takes some trade-offs or concessions then so be it. And to have any hope of getting there before I go grey(er), we need our licensing/ownership issues to be settled one way or the other.

Otherwise sure, if nobody comes to the table, then we go full ICSID and sit in for the long haul.
Rio's endeavour in Serbia is not exactly smooth sailing.


I don't know if they are mesmerising about Manono, or giving Manono a wide berth as being a poison pill.
They did visit the DRC MoM recently, I am curious what that was all about.
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 7 users

wombat74

Top 20
Seems to be the concensus they are legit and there is both a French and an English version

Fucking completely contradicts this official statement below made a few weeks ago by the same organisation where they advise Felix they are having amicable discussions with AVZ and the case is being reviewed by experts


View attachment 67910

Fuck me..... you couldn't make this shit up :rolleyes:
Yeh but they also said this.

"An expert was recruited to assess the risks that the country may incur following this dispute if it were to be resolved through legal channels."
" The defence team has recommended the continuation of the arbitration ".

In other words the asset is worth more than the penalty and Chinese snacks are delicious .
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 2 users

oxxa23

Regular
Seems to be the concensus they are legit and there is both a French and an English version

Fucking completely contradicts this official statement below made a few weeks ago by the same organisation where they advise Felix they are having amicable discussions with AVZ and the case is being reviewed by experts


View attachment 67910

Fuck me..... you couldn't make this shit up :rolleyes:
I reckon i'm having dejavu.... swear i've read this 1312 times over the last two years....

"Fuck me..... you couldn't make this shit up"
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 16 users

Mr_Tones83

Regular
Yeh but they also said this.

"An expert was recruited to assess the risks that the country may incur following this dispute if it were to be resolved through legal channels."
" The defence team has recommended the continuation of the arbitration ".

In other words the asset is worth more than the penalty and Chinese snacks are delicious .
I didn't exactly read that way, but could be wrong... they said the defence team recommended continuing arbitration, then they said they've recruited an expert, so it doesn't sound like this 'expert' has done their work yet
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9 users

Doc

Master of Quan
I didn't exactly read that way, but could be wrong... they said the defence team recommended continuing arbitration, then they said they've recruited an expert, so it doesn't sound like this 'expert' has done their work yet
Can only imagine where this 'expert' might hail from.......
 
  • Like
  • Sad
  • Haha
Reactions: 5 users

wombat74

Top 20
I didn't exactly read that way, but could be wrong... they said the defence team recommended continuing arbitration, then they said they've recruited an expert, so it doesn't sound like this 'expert' has done their work yet
Yes I did edit a few words . However that was my take on it .

There were some positive take aways from AVZ's report . Enough to perhaps promote a potential successful CR . Something the Chinese/DRC became aware of and are now trying to foil. IMO
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 8 users

cruiser51

Top 20
I didn't exactly read that way, but could be wrong... they said the defence team recommended continuing arbitration, then they said they've recruited an expert, so it doesn't sound like this 'expert' has done their work yet
If you are a lawyer, wouldn't you recommend to continue the fight?

Isn't that the same as a your car mechanic recommending don't stop with your car maintenance?

At the end, if the lawyer doesn't win he will say 'Well mate we did our best', Ka fucking ching.

It is not in the best interest of a lawyer, if you kiss and make up.
If everybody did, the legal fraternity would have to take up a newspaper round, or pull beer in the pub, they are great in the talking shit department.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13 users

Mr_Tones83

Regular
If you are a lawyer, wouldn't you recommend to continue the fight?

Isn't that the same as a your car mechanic recommending don't stop with your car maintenance?

At the end, if the lawyer doesn't win he will say 'Well mate we did our best', Ka fucking ching.

It is not in the best interest of a lawyer, if you kiss and make up.
If everybody did, the legal fraternity would have to take up a newspaper round, or pull beer in the pub, they are great in the talking shit department.
Yep, I'm not disputing that the lawyers would say to keep going. Aside from the bribe-takers, they're the main winners in this saga so far.

What I meant to highlight was the fact that the DRC MoM likely hasn't had their recruited 'expert' complete the assessment as to the potential risks of the legal cases running their course as yet. If that were to be done by a competent person then it could put extra pressure on them to come to the table and get a deal done quicker.
More than likely it'll be a Zijin shill used to keep kicking the can down the road though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users

cruiser51

Top 20
Yep, I'm not disputing that the lawyers would say to keep going. Aside from the bribe-takers, they're the main winners in this saga so far.

What I meant to highlight was the fact that the DRC MoM likely hasn't had their recruited 'expert' complete the assessment as to the potential risks of the legal cases running their course as yet. If that were to be done by a competent person then it could put extra pressure on them to come to the table and get a deal done quicker.
More than likely it'll be a Zijin shill used to keep kicking the can down the road though.
Don't forget that the current vice MoM, Godard Motemona Gibolum
1723455534633.png
, is the same as in last government, we probably could say the left hand of the current MoM and might not agree that the current MoM is, under instruction of FT and PM, talking with AVZ.
Who knows maybe the left hand is not talking with the right hand, or he is pissed off that he is not MoM.
Creating a bit of animosity to undermine the current MoM, could well be a game of the Chinese.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 8 users
Top Bottom