AVZ Discussion 2022

[wombat74]

View attachment 37853

Edit: Relatifs Aux Actionnaires does not list Zijin or whatever the fuck they call themselves in the DRC = OUT

Lets watch for the withdrawal from the ICC .

 

[timb89]

View attachment 37853

Edit: Relatifs Aux Actionnaires does not list Zijin or whatever the fuck they call themselves in the DRC = OUT

What prompted you to look for this file around this time? Or is it continuous activity?

 

[UpTheDuff]

i don't know. unless my translate is not working well isn't it just referring to time period between 2018-2019? Why would the looters be in the document?

Is there an explanation what this document is actually for?

 

[j.l]

i don't know. unless my translate is not working well isn't it just referring to time period between 2018-2019? Why would the looters be in the document?

Is there an explanation what this document is actually for?

Registration date
Start date of operation

 

[TDITD]

View attachment 37853

Edit: Relatifs Aux Actionnaires does not list Zijin or whatever the fuck they call themselves in the DRC = OUT

Great work.
Corruption does not want to let go though......
Fucking Dathomir
They signed the contract, now honour it Cong !!

 

[TDITD]

I can see a takeover coming soon....12 $$$ nothing less for all the sleepless nights

I'm with you
$12 fuckers!!!


USD

 

[Mute22]

View attachment 37853

Edit: Relatifs Aux Actionnaires does not list Zijin or whatever the fuck they call themselves in the DRC = OUT

Don't do that.. Don't give me hope

 

[j.l]

Surely Dathomir are gone as well ? Dathomir will offload to Zijin .

Please no, not a new attack vector!!

 

[pow4ade]

i don't know. unless my translate is not working well isn't it just referring to time period between 2018-2019? Why would the looters be in the document?

Is there an explanation what this document is actually for?

Doco is date-stamped 31/05/2023

 

[Carlos Danger]

i don't know. unless my translate is not working well isn't it just referring to time period between 2018-2019? Why would the looters be in the document?

Is there an explanation what this document is actually for?

 

[solo]

View attachment 37853

Edit: Relatifs Aux Actionnaires does not list Zijin or whatever the fuck they call themselves in the DRC = OUT

Do you have same document from earlier date with Zijin/JinChen in it? As far as I remember Franck Fwamba tweeted in December 2022 that Zijin/JinCheng never been added at RCCM.

 

[Remark]

So many newly emerged, welcome friends!
Ps. Love your work @9cardomaha

 

[UpTheDuff]

So many newly emerged, welcome friends!
Ps. Love your work @9cardomaha

been here since early days. thanks for welcome.

 

[geo_au]

Yesterday I emailed AVZ seeking a time frame for a progress report and the back story on Zijin and Cominiere's claims for damages due to the large amount of speculation and disinformation floating around, and their potential impact on AVZ.

So here is AVZ's reply:

View attachment 37836

Cheers
F

You blocked your name out but it does come up with the click of the mouse. Just letting you know for your own privacy.

 

[bloke383]

Contract between other parties is a harder document to get, RCCM is a state-run organization, you can go in with your DRC driver's license, request documents, hand a few crumpled-up 5s to the clerk, and you got yourself some smoking gun.

Will keep trying for the contract as this is the more crucial part of the case - no sugar coating it, they didn't return it for nothing (unless you know... China happened).

Would be the best case, papa xi tells Zijin to sit the fuck down, and we get this.

View attachment 37856

I understand your concern as to what Zijin might have wanted for "returning" the 15% .
I know that document is dated May 31st , but the decision on the jv participants wouldn't have been decided that day would it ? If the decision was known some time prior , & indeed Zijin is out of the jv of the entire 13359 tenement it would explain Zijin/Cominiere request a couple of weeks ago for compensation at the ICC (as that request was out of the blue) .
It makes no sense for Zijin to relinquish the 15% in return for half our tenement (CDL) , & also claim for damages as well

 

[ptlas]

You blocked your name out but it does come up with the click of the mouse. Just letting you know for your own privacy.

That message need to be in a PM mate.
Trolls still lurking

 

[The Fox]

I understand your concern as to what Zijin might have wanted for "returning" the 15% .
I know that document is dated May 31st , but the decision on the jv participants wouldn't have been decided that day would it ? If the decision was known some time prior , & indeed Zijin is out of the jv of the entire 13359 tenement it would explain Zijin/Cominiere request a couple of weeks ago for compensation at the ICC (as that request was out of the blue) .
It makes no sense for Zijin to relinquish the 15% in return for half our tenement (CDL) , & also claim for damages as well

Nice that this document is already pre-stamped with a seal and then dated and then printed before a signature attached. Yet that is not uncommon in Africa I guess. Hmm

To be clear,

1. Print Template with Seal.
2. Apply Date Stamp (31 May etc) on top of Seal.
3. Print with Date Stamp, Seal and overlay document details.
3. Print again with Signature on top of Stamp, Date and document details.

Curious

 

[9cardomaha]

Do you have same document from earlier date with Zijin/JinChen in it? As far as I remember Franck Fwamba tweeted in December 2022 that Zijin/JinCheng never been added at RCCM.

This one in the attachment? They were in there, not sure if Frank was talking about a court doc to void their addition.

 

[Carlos Danger]

Do you have same document from earlier date with Zijin/JinChen in it? As far as I remember Franck Fwamba tweeted in December 2022 that Zijin/JinCheng never been added at RCCM.

This one in the attachment? They were in there, not sure if Frank was talking about a court doc to void their addition.

Personally I think Franck was trolling about it being Jin Cheng in Dathcom rather than Zijin. No chance he would have not known Jin Cheng were in Dathcom on the RCCM at that time.

 

[The Fox]

Personally I think Franck was trolling about it being Jin Cheng in Dathcom rather than Zijin. No chance he would have not known Jin Cheng were in Dathcom on the RCCM at that time.
View attachment 37876

I hope Franck is on the money, although he is quite late on the predictions.