Zijin seem confident though.Dayum, that's a firm "Go f%@k yourselves." by AVZ.
Nice.
ExactlyMy concern with the wording of the arbitration announcement is this: "AVZ has received a request for arbitration ... from Jin".
That means is Jin taking us to arbitration, meaning they obviously think they have a decent case.
Yes they are demanding to be recognised as a shareholder at 15% is my view.My concern with the wording of the arbitration announcement is this: "AVZ has received a request for arbitration ... from Jin".
That means is Jin taking us to arbitration, meaning they obviously think they have a decent case.
Even if Jin Cheng does't have a legal case to make they would still do it anyway as they have the cash to burn and would make it as difficult as possible for AVZ to proceed and create more bad press going ahead. SpitefulMy concern with the wording of the arbitration announcement is this: "AVZ has received a request for arbitration ... from Jin".
That means is Jin taking us to arbitration, meaning they obviously think they have a decent case.
I read somewhere that AVZ as majority holder and has preemptive rights have to approve the transfer for it to be validAt the end of the day isn’t this really zijin vs DRC? We didn’t actually own the 15% being disputed, it’s a legality issues between them. We just piggy in the middle
At the end of the day isn’t this really zijin vs DRC? We didn’t actually own the 15% being disputed, it’s a legality issues between them. We just piggy in the middle