AVZ Discussion 2022

hedrox

Regular
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 11 users

oxxa23

Regular
good news... hope you fuckers are all well.... enjoy a weekend sip comrades..... oxxa out... until more good news...
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
  • Love
Reactions: 16 users
Even if it is not the buy-out that some had hoped for, the financing from Locke clearly shows how strong our legal position is. Locke will also have consulted external specified lawyers and meticulously analyzed the legal situation. They seem to have come to the conclusion that AVZ's legal proceedings are watertight.
The corrupt bunch can pack their bags.
They are kunts. I think we should call them what they are.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 4 users

grassseeds

Regular
Re the meeting today. A crowd of say about 100, and many people came from Interstate.

Earlier at the Herdsman Tavern Yianni went through the current situation as he sees it at the meeting before the AGM.

After the resolutions were completed and current details of the outstanding legal issues were outlined Nigel and John Clarke took questions. As I see it Nigel felt that getting the Locke funding allows AVZ to now start pushing harder to get issues resolved. The Locke funding also gives a foundation for getting additional capital.

A query was raised about selling the project or going to mining John Clarke felt that being prepared to mine needs to be a priority as it gives you greater flexibility depending on what shareholders want and what options are available.

The question was raised about AVZ current value. Nigel's response was that with a Mining license in place and depending on Lithium prices the project value varied between $2.5 billion and $7.5 billion.

John Clarke, Nigel and Graeme Johnston went to the Hersdman Tavern and spoke further to any shareholder present.

Overall feeling that the Directors projected was that the Locke funding was a catalyst to be more proactive. They are still optimistic about getting value back to shareholders.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 82 users

BRICK

Where’s Zeebot 😶‍🌫️
Re the meeting today. A crowd of say about 100, and many people came from Interstate.

Earlier at the Herdsman Tavern Yianni went through the current situation as he sees it at the meeting before the AGM.

After the resolutions were completed and current details of the outstanding legal issues were outlined Nigel and John Clarke took questions. As I see it Nigel felt that getting the Locke funding allows AVZ to now start pushing harder to get issues resolved. The Locke funding also gives a foundation for getting additional capital.

A query was raised about selling the project or going to mining John Clarke felt that being prepared to mine needs to be a priority as it gives you greater flexibility depending on what shareholders want and what options are available.

The question was raised about AVZ current value. Nigel's response was that with a Mining license in place and depending on Lithium prices the project value varied between $2.5 billion and $7.5 billion.

John Clarke, Nigel and Graeme Johnston went to the Hersdman Tavern and spoke further to any shareholder present.

Overall feeling that the Directors projected was that the Locke funding was a catalyst to be more proactive. They are still optimistic about getting value back to shareholders.
Thanks mate.

Appreciate it
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9 users

Azzler

Top 20
Re the meeting today. A crowd of say about 100, and many people came from Interstate.

Earlier at the Herdsman Tavern Yianni went through the current situation as he sees it at the meeting before the AGM.

After the resolutions were completed and current details of the outstanding legal issues were outlined Nigel and John Clarke took questions. As I see it Nigel felt that getting the Locke funding allows AVZ to now start pushing harder to get issues resolved. The Locke funding also gives a foundation for getting additional capital.

A query was raised about selling the project or going to mining John Clarke felt that being prepared to mine needs to be a priority as it gives you greater flexibility depending on what shareholders want and what options are available.

The question was raised about AVZ current value. Nigel's response was that with a Mining license in place and depending on Lithium prices the project value varied between $2.5 billion and $7.5 billion.

John Clarke, Nigel and Graeme Johnston went to the Hersdman Tavern and spoke further to any shareholder present.

Overall feeling that the Directors projected was that the Locke funding was a catalyst to be more proactive. They are still optimistic about getting value back to shareholders.
Great post. Thanks mate! :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11 users

Mute22

Regular
Re the meeting today. A crowd of say about 100, and many people came from Interstate.

Earlier at the Herdsman Tavern Yianni went through the current situation as he sees it at the meeting before the AGM.

After the resolutions were completed and current details of the outstanding legal issues were outlined Nigel and John Clarke took questions. As I see it Nigel felt that getting the Locke funding allows AVZ to now start pushing harder to get issues resolved. The Locke funding also gives a foundation for getting additional capital.

A query was raised about selling the project or going to mining John Clarke felt that being prepared to mine needs to be a priority as it gives you greater flexibility depending on what shareholders want and what options are available.

The question was raised about AVZ current value. Nigel's response was that with a Mining license in place and depending on Lithium prices the project value varied between $2.5 billion and $7.5 billion.

John Clarke, Nigel and Graeme Johnston went to the Hersdman Tavern and spoke further to any shareholder present.

Overall feeling that the Directors projected was that the Locke funding was a catalyst to be more proactive. They are still optimistic about getting value back to shareholders.
Thanks mate :)

Now somebody please DM the real goss so my wife will let me sleep in the house again.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 14 users

PhatCatz

Regular
Interesting Nigel said those figures on stock value.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

CHB

Regular
Thanks for feedback
 

Rediah

Regular
Soooooo thirsty for the intel....


Zodiac Leon GIF by Believeinyourgoals
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 users

Azzler

Top 20
I have intel, JUICY intel!
Can not share, because of the Chinese.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

Mute22

Regular
I have intel, JUICY intel!
Can not share, because of the Chinese.

And these "Chinese", are they in the room with you right now?

1732875450392.png
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 20 users

eqtrade

Regular
Re the meeting today. A crowd of say about 100, and many people came from Interstate.

Earlier at the Herdsman Tavern Yianni went through the current situation as he sees it at the meeting before the AGM.

After the resolutions were completed and current details of the outstanding legal issues were outlined Nigel and John Clarke took questions. As I see it Nigel felt that getting the Locke funding allows AVZ to now start pushing harder to get issues resolved. The Locke funding also gives a foundation for getting additional capital.

A query was raised about selling the project or going to mining John Clarke felt that being prepared to mine needs to be a priority as it gives you greater flexibility depending on what shareholders want and what options are available.

The question was raised about AVZ current value. Nigel's response was that with a Mining license in place and depending on Lithium prices the project value varied between $2.5 billion and $7.5 billion.

John Clarke, Nigel and Graeme Johnston went to the Hersdman Tavern and spoke further to any shareholder present.

Overall feeling that the Directors projected was that the Locke funding was a catalyst to be more proactive. They are still optimistic about getting value back to shareholders.
Thank you very much.
Was there any question if the company has received any compensation for the legal cost mentioned in previous announcement about winning against Zijin?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

Dave Evans

Regular
Re the meeting today. A crowd of say about 100, and many people came from Interstate.

Earlier at the Herdsman Tavern Yianni went through the current situation as he sees it at the meeting before the AGM.

After the resolutions were completed and current details of the outstanding legal issues were outlined Nigel and John Clarke took questions. As I see it Nigel felt that getting the Locke funding allows AVZ to now start pushing harder to get issues resolved. The Locke funding also gives a foundation for getting additional capital.

A query was raised about selling the project or going to mining John Clarke felt that being prepared to mine needs to be a priority as it gives you greater flexibility depending on what shareholders want and what options are available.

The question was raised about AVZ current value. Nigel's response was that with a Mining license in place and depending on Lithium prices the project value varied between $2.5 billion and $7.5 billion.

John Clarke, Nigel and Graeme Johnston went to the Hersdman Tavern and spoke further to any shareholder present.

Overall feeling that the Directors projected was that the Locke funding was a catalyst to be more proactive. They are still optimistic about getting value back to shareholders.

The question was raised about AVZ current value. Nigel's response was that with a Mining license in place and depending on Lithium prices the project value varied between $2.5 billion and $7.5 billion”

Nearly sounds like Nigel could be prepared to negotiate a deal at a price somewhere between the price when we went into suspension to around $2 a share.

That would be a lot less than an ICSID finding in our favour which could value our shares at: The value of the project as at the start date of production including increased processing capacity (4.5 Mtpa to 10 Mtpa), updated mineral resource (840MT of SC6), updated ore price forecasts (SC6, PLS, Tin), change in mine life and updated BFS.

Personally I hate every one of those corrupt cunts that have worked against us, including the DRC’s fat potato headed prick of a president. I’ve spent every day accumulating information on all of them since this started and I would love to see them all fucked up the arse, so I personally have been ready to put all my investment on the line and wait for the ICSID.

I know there’s a lot of shareholders who just want to cash out at reasonable price and I understand that and also understand that the BOD are probably sick of the DRC. On top of the fact that a lot of shareholders can’t make up their minds half the time, a case in point being all the shareholders that kicked up a stink at the thought of giving up CDL and now would be happy to lose it if they can get something for Roche Dure.

Just like some questioning the Locke deal and the sweeteners they are getting when a lot of shareholders we’re probably shitting themselves that we wouldn’t get it over the line and we’d go into VA.

The BOD has had to deal with all the corrupt wankers I mentioned in previous posts, that’s why I will back them but I’ll be fucked if I’m going to vote for a piss fart $2 offer after fighting the corruption for the last two and half years. Our shares are worth no less than $3 even at this stage.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 52 users

JohnJoyce

Regular
Would love to know if there was any questions as to why the fucking Chinese are all over the Manono tenement digging and building.

We are paying for security after all.

Thanks all for your input
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 6 users

grassseeds

Regular
Interesting Nigel said those figures on stock value.
Hi, Nigel was originally asked what AVZ's current value was. As this was difficult to comment on he changed the parameters to what the value may be. His answer was not definitive and he inferred that there were a lot of variables. Eg if we got a license for all of 13359, what else was included such as Dathomir's and Comminere's shareholding and control of the hydropower. Other issues of other shareholding is another matter. I assumed that he was trying to indicate to shareholders that you need to be realistic. My interpretation is that a possible figure of less than $ 1 per share is the most likely outcome.
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 7 users

Azzler

Top 20
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 8 users

grassseeds

Regular
Thank you very much.
Was there any question if the company has received any compensation for the legal cost mentioned in previous announcement about winning against Zijin?
The meeting was advised that they had not received any funds. AVZ like our opponents have not paid the ICC funds etc and AVZ will be paying up shortly. Because of AVZ's poor cash position they have been very frugal and many staff have not been paid for some time. Other supplier bills have also been deferred with supplier support.
I have not bothered to add other minor comments such as USA support for Lobito corridor and whether USA or Australian Govt's are showing any support. Indications are that the USA have shown interest and the Aust Govt not much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 23 users

Stag

Emerged
When asked about others accessing our core sample library Nigel stated that no one has accessed the core sample store or camp without AVZ permission
He stated that they do indeed have a good relationship with the DRC government in general apart from the paper bag receivers and was hopeful that they will be removed going forward.
When asked about possible support from the US government, he said that the US ambassador was well informed on the situation but said that the Australian government told them that they do not get involved in private businesses!
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
  • Wow
Reactions: 20 users
Top Bottom