Bravo
Meow Meow 🐾
Here's a thought:
If an object moving at close to light speed passes between a pair of opposed mirrors, would each reflection show the object in different places at one instant?
Mirrors. Hours of entertainment.
Here's a thought:
If an object moving at close to light speed passes between a pair of opposed mirrors, would each reflection show the object in different places at one instant?
No. It's not going at the speed of light. It would just be red shifted if receding, or blue shifted if approaching. But that's not the point. You would need a very high speed event camera to do this! It's really a thought experiment.Would it not still be invisible to the human eye???
Damn! You've caught me in my lab again!
Might be our little TigerFrom this photo we can see that they have 2 tables set up for demo's plus the table in @wilzy123 post
I see a Panda and a toy car but can't make out the 3rd figure??
View attachment 54067
Lol, yes that is my main goal here, you caught me out. You are like the Collingwood football club, either love them or hate them. (I am a Cats supporter in case you missed the point) Although I am aware you like the last word and try your best to belittle people, I will also respond because you asked.I know you want a reply to further bury the value content from today's CES but even Blind Freddie will tell you that if you read my whole post you would have read the words I have informed the company and it is being attended to. Obviously implicit in that statement is a level of disapproval.
As you claim to have read my other posts you will note that I suggested the appropriate course is to note the error on here if you must but send an email bringing the error to the company's attention for correction.
What I am not doing like you is to assume that the company which immediately reacted to the notification by me is just laughing it off and not taking any action to improve the employee, cadet or as I would suspect the IR contractors performance.
What I would like to know from you though as a person who runs a successful business why you have so readily leapt to the conclusion that Brainchip's executive staff are not successful business people who work to improve staff performance and counsel the staff member, contractor or even the cadet from one of the University programs responsible for the error? Have you communicated with Brainchip at an executive level and been informed that they find these errors acceptable and they encourage the making thereof by staff?
I must thank you though for a two things:
1. Confirming as I have said many times typos will not destroy the company nor put at risk partnership relations or frighten away real investors.
2. I have heard it screamed by some and the majority on HC that the CEO should be drawn and quartered for letting these typos go out. Now thanks to you if they scream out such nonsense again we can refer them to your post because you have made clear that successful business people like you allow staff to post things without checking every word beforehand then take corrective action.
My opinion only DYOR
Fact Finder
Yes Wouldn’t this place be so much better if those from the other side never spread there poison.I haven't posted in a while as the forum gets rather toxic at times.
I thought it might of been the 1.4 mil shares in the que for 17 cents that’s slowed the selling to themselves down.Afternoon Boab ,
Presently , I'm baffled to be honest .
Think the algos suppressing us are waiting for the slightest whiff of something ....... anything with $ attached .
Sorry , not much help .
Regards ,
Esq.
Infineon** Good post, well said.I haven't posted in a while as the forum gets rather toxic at times.
These podcasts at CES however do clearly tell me one thing - The team at Brainchip have listened to feedback regarding communication. These have been great little snippets of updates with a few partners. My favourite so far being Onsemi and Inivation.
I sincerely hope Nandan will be bringing Farshad's (Inivation) comments to Sean Hehirs attention ASAP. I emailed Tony to also follow up with Sean to hopefully benefit from valuable critique from Farshad.
"I have been involved with Brainchip for less than a year, or maybe a year so far...I've been interacting with the company in terms of learning their capabilities"
"it is very promising, I also think their are certain areas that you're not advertising as best as you could"
"Kind of underestimating yourselves"
I really hope the dot joiners can calm down a little and not dismiss posters where someone doesn't jump to the premature conclusions that some draw here without fact or announcements. I like this place and hate blatant downramping as much as the next well intentioned shareholder. But we are still VERY early on in partnerships with some companies from the sounds of it. And we clearly aren't advertising our full capabilities well enough just yet (one partners' opinion but they are in a better position to comment on this than any of us). Hopefully this is a very fruitful year for us and it sounds like a little traction may be headed our way.
Thanks mt, edited. It has been a hell of a first week back at work.Infineon** Good post, we’ll said.
Happy to oblige.Got anything more up to date……we all know about the EQXX from 2022!…….and it was a great endorsement from MB.
The new CLA concept is going to be using NVIDIA and is the reason for the ’water-cooled’ chip…….and the chip-to-cloud processing.
Now unless you can find any evidence that Akida will be used for processing data at the edge of the sensors in the CLA concept…..then all you have is ‘Hope’.
Akida will be used extensively in future MB models……..just not in this one…..it’s too early for us.
hit me with your condescending and patronising memes….i’m ready
themarketinfo.com
Hi D&S,I haven't posted in a while as the forum gets rather toxic at times.
These podcasts at CES however do clearly tell me one thing - The team at Brainchip have listened to feedback regarding communication. These have been great little snippets of updates with a few partners. My favourite so far being Onsemi and Inivation.
I sincerely hope Nandan will be bringing Farshad's (Inivation) comments to Sean Hehirs attention ASAP. I emailed Tony to also follow up with Sean to hopefully benefit from valuable critique from Farshad.
"I have been involved with Brainchip for less than a year, or maybe a year so far...I've been interacting with the company in terms of learning their capabilities"
"it is very promising, I also think their are certain areas that you're not advertising as best as you could"
"Kind of underestimating yourselves"
I really hope the dot joiners can calm down a little and not dismiss posters where someone doesn't jump to the premature conclusions that some draw here without fact or announcements. I like this place and hate blatant downramping as much as the next well intentioned shareholder. But we are still VERY early on in partnerships with some companies from the sounds of it. And we clearly aren't advertising our full capabilities well enough just yet (one partners' opinion but they are in a better position to comment on this than any of us). Hopefully this is a very fruitful year for us and it sounds like a little traction may be headed our way.