D
Deleted member 118
Guest
Thank you, for not posting cooked diatribe. Forum has really gone downhill last few days.
Thank you, for not posting cooked diatribe. Forum has really gone downhill last few days.
BRN has been de-risked for me for sometime, share price fluctuations are out of my control it's all about trying to pick a price I'm happy with topping up and imo the prices we are seeing are going to be dirt cheap compared to future price.So Rise, as @Bravo piles on the scaling-mountain-of-dots and @TECH outlines the logical timeframes, it has triggered your derisked-threshold?
Therefore, you activate a Binary Step Function to buy some more BRN. Very logical!!!
(Dio mentioned Step Functions and got me curious.)
https://towardsdatascience.com/getting-to-know-activation-functions-in-neural-networks-125405b67428
View attachment 28200
Here Here Post of the dayAttention all whining and whinging, lazy people, who are still holding mommies hand.
If you haven't registered on the companies website for email updates, then you don't deserve to know what's going on.
Don't be so, FFFing pathetic.
Agreed WH, A few holder who I got in have previously stated 'whinge , whinge nothing going on with BRN " I've told them to sign up to company website also sub to brn YouTube channel also to sign up here. One is not too bad but the other I feel like slamming my elbow straight into his face, such a f dick.Attention all whining and whinging, lazy people, who are still holding mommies hand.
If you haven't registered on the companies website for email updates, then you don't deserve to know what's going on.
Don't be so, FFFing pathetic.
An extract from the article.
FD-SOI
GlobalFoundries was the first player to enter the 22nm race. Three years ago the company introduced a 22nm FD-SOI technology. For some time, Samsung has offered 28nm FD-SOI with an 18nm version in the works.
In addition, GlobalFoundries is developing a 12nm planar version of FD-SOI, which is expected to appear in 2022. Generally, 22nm or 18nm FD-SOI doesn’t compete with 16nm/14nm finFETs, and they serve different markets with little overlap.
FD-SOI uses a specialized SOI wafer, which integrates a thin insulating layer (20 to 25nm thick) in the substrate. This layer isolates the transistor from the substrate, thereby blocking the leakage in the device.
FD-SOI also is based on a planar, fully depleted architecture. “This essentially eliminates the random dopant fluctuation, providing superior mismatch and electrostatics to improve sub-threshold slope,” GlobalFoundries’ Schaeffer said.
GlobalFoundries’ 22nm FD-SOI technology, called 22FDX, incorporates high-k/metal-gate with silicon-germanium in the channel. It provides 30% higher performance and 45% lower power compared to 28nm. It was production-qualified in early 2017.
Recently, GlobalFoundries added more capabilities to the mix. “Sub-6GHz RF, mmWave, ultra-low leakage and ultra-low power extensions have all been qualified,” Schaeffer said.
What makes FD-SOI attractive are two features—low-power and body bias. It enables drive currents of 910μA/μm (856μA/μm) at 0.8 volts, with voltage operations down to 0.4 volts.
“Body bias is the ability to fully control the threshold voltage (Vth) of the transistors dynamically by polarizing the back gate of the transistor. Vth—which was a parameter determinable only by process through complex doping techniques—is now programmable dynamically through software,” said Manuel Sellier, product marketing manager at Soitec. “Designers can use this feature to dynamically manage the leakage in their circuit, and also to compensate static (process) and dynamic variations (temperature, voltage, and aging) efficiently. The result is a 4X to 7X energy efficiency gain at ultra-low power.”
FD-SOI also supports forward body biasing. When polarization of the substrate is positive, the transistor can be switched faster, according to STMicroelectronics.
FD-SOI, however, has three drawbacks—cost, ecosystem and adoption. For years, FD-SOI has had limited adoption. Intel, TSMC, UMC and others have never adopted FD-SOI, saying bulk CMOS enables high-performance devices at better costs. For example, an SOI wafer sells from $370 to $400 each, compared to $100 to $120 for a bulk CMOS wafer.
But FD-SOI does have a lower mask count, which compensates for the wafer cost. FD-SOI has 22 to 24 mask steps, while a comparable bulk CMOS process has 27 to 29 mask steps, according to IBS.
FD-SOI is closing the gap, too. “We are now looking at what we view as the limit of bulk CMOS,” IBS’ Jones said. “Transistor costs for 22nm FD-SOI are within 5% of the transistor costs for 22nm HKMG (high-k/metal-gate). 22nm FD SOI gives 30% to 50% lower power consumption compared to 22nm HKMG, which is important for wearable and IoT devices.”
The FD-SOI community, however, lags in terms of the EDA/IP ecosystem. “The IP ecosystem for 22nm FD-SOI is strengthening, but 22nm HKMG bulk CMOS has a broader IP ecosystem,” Jones said.
The tide is turning. Cadence, Mentor and Synopsys have been certified for various EDA tools for GlobalFoundries’ FD-SOI technology.
“There are some unique capabilities for RF, for example, with integrated FD-SOI, which are very hard to equal in other ways,” said Wally Rhines, president and CEO of Mentor.
FD-SOI has other advantages. “While the finFET gives you near zero leakage, you still have dynamic power. One of the advantages of FD-SOI is dynamic power. If you can reduce the voltage from one volt down to 0.6, that’s a 65% reduction in power. FD-SOI has some advantages in being able to dynamically alter the power versus the performance balance,” Rhines said.
Always loved the clean, crisp and visually standout nature of our new website as well as the kite which they use in marketing material such as the recently released White Paper.
Hi BL,I think what happened was we have had a huge runs over the last couple of years and retraced well too.
We have had a few Anns like NASA, Ford etc which caused massive runs after BRN was asked to ''please explain''.
We have plenty of organisations such as AFR, Motley Fools etc., their friends, other hedge funds, instos... who all would ask for a ''fair and reasonable'' market by reporting these to ASX (I say this because I know there are reporters on AFR who specialise in this sort of reporting and have listened to their side of story myself).
Unfortunately retails are not in their club so our reports will be in the bin straight away.
I believe WBT isn't having such huge volatility and is possibly flying under the radar already so they wouldn't have an issue. Their SOI is comparatively lower, at around 173 million and out of that around 34 million is with top 20. Not much room for the big guys to play around.
These are only my opinion only, dyor.
Exactly
We expect our nextI had to read that a couple of times too. I believe they meant.......
BRN have released the design to Global Foundries and expect they will have the chips manufactured and returned to BRN in the 2nd quarter.
" I was pointing out that Weebit are going the same FAB route as us with 22nm FD-SOI."Hi BL,
It's not "exactly", because I was not supporting an argument for more disclosure.
I was pointing out that Weebit are going the same FAB route as us with 22nm FD-SOI.
Nothing to do with the argument you and others have been flogging to death all day.
If you and others can't get you mind around the companies disclosure policy, you should sell
and buy into these other companies of which you are so enamored.
Actually , not just today, but what seems like forever.
Regards
WH
Always loved the clean, crisp and visually standout nature of our new website as well as the kite which they use in marketing material such as the recently released White Paper.
The kite reminds me of a song (decades ago) which says it all about Brainchip:
"Let's go fly a kite
Up to the highest height
Let's go fly a kite
And send it soaring
Up through the atmosphere
Up where the air is clear
Oh, let's go fly a kite"
Nothing more to say
I'm assuming one run of Akida 1500 as there is no mention of taping out other designs. Global Foundries could handle it, they have a multi project wafer program. The same as system TSMC used for Akida, only difference would be the whole wafer would be ours with the different variants.We expect our next
reference chips (plural) to be delivered in Q2 of this year.
Question: Do people read this as (many/plural) AKIDA1500 chips being delivered in Q2, or does the plural imply Akida1500, AKIDA500, AKIDA2000, etc?
Whenever anyone talks about wafers I automatically think of waffles and then I have to go and raid the fridge. Does that happen to anyone else?I'm assuming one run of Akida 1500 as there is no mention of taping out other designs. Global Foundries could handle it, they have a multi project wafer program. The same as system TSMC used for Akida, only difference would be the whole wafer would be ours with the different variants.
Multi-Project Wafer Program
I had assumed this to mean they will have AKD1500 reference chips in hand by Q2 end (30 June 2023) now that tape out has occurred.There hasn't been much talk about some of the finer points.
One I particularly like,
We expect our next
reference chips (plural) to be delivered in Q2 of this year.