I think I need to have therapy before this fixation becomes a full blown obsession but I just had a thought as a result of which I counted the names on
@BaconLover ‘s Iceberg.
There are only 67 names in total above and below the waterline of the Iceberg.
At a minimum we are short 33 names just to reach the lowest rung of the ‘well north of 100 NDA’s’ mentioned by Mr. Dinardo.
So if 500 is correct I know as an increment of probability that the 67 names on the Iceberg the chances of all names being correct increases.
If I add in that the class of customers that have not yet been identified to us by Brainchip are said to be household named and or Fortune 500 then the probability of the companies below the waterline not being customers of Brainchip becomes even less likely.
These random thoughts lead me to only one conclusion
@MC🐠 has been far too conservative in his wild speculation as to the companies engaged with Brainchip.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA