Fox151
Regular
Oh, it's fun. I had a lot of fun until the fun police banned me for life. They wouldn't even approve my alter-ego Jag Sandwich from joining. Their mods clearly lack a sense of humor.
BRN Discussion Ongoing
- Thread starter TechGirl
- Start date
Just think of Dodgy Knees -- you can call me dodgy for short.
DingoBorat
Slim
I've just posted this on the TMH thread and am reposting it here, as it may be of interest, to BRN holders 
I have a hypothesis, on how TMH runs hotcrapper, which is along the lines of..
At some point, hotcrapper (from now on HC) decided a "conflict model", was a good way to increase discussions and forum visits.
Paid employees of HC, were given assignments, to debate and offer alternative views, on popular companies, to increase posts and discussion, increasing traffic and making advertising, more attractive to marketers.
Somewhere along the line, when "downramping" these stocks, they realised, that the negative sentiment being created, was actually influencing the share price (such was the reach and use, of HC, by retail investors).
At some further point, either the managers or owners, of HC, or associates of theirs, saw the opportunity, to make money from the influence of HC on retail holders.
This is where, paid downramping and trolling, became used as a tool, beyond their "conflict model", on select "target companies" to make money, using the leverage of shorting.
At some further point again, the pinning of ***************** articles, was added to the mix, using tabloidly, derogatory, inventive and dramatic journalism, to cast the company in a bad light and negatively impact sentiment.
This pinning is always accompanied by, an increase in shorting, as well as an increase in both paid "intelligent?" downrampers and less intelligent, troll minions, aimed at disrupting and overpowering, constructive discussions on the threads, of the target company.
This appears to have been a successful strategy, as TMH revenues, dramatically increased, from full year 2020, to full year 2021.
That is until, they encountered Brainchip.
But of course, the story of this hypothesis, of TMH or associates, shorting BRN in particular, while using HC and articles published by TMH, as tools to manipulate the market, is not over yet..
I want to stress, that this is just a hypothesis, nothing more!
I would however, appreciate any help, from anyone, with links to similar articles and the dates they were pinned, onto other stocks, for further study
I remember someone saying Novonix (NVX) has also been a target?
My opinions only.
I'd like to add, that I do condone plagiarism, of my posts, should this end up on HC
I have a hypothesis, on how TMH runs hotcrapper, which is along the lines of..
At some point, hotcrapper (from now on HC) decided a "conflict model", was a good way to increase discussions and forum visits.
Paid employees of HC, were given assignments, to debate and offer alternative views, on popular companies, to increase posts and discussion, increasing traffic and making advertising, more attractive to marketers.
Somewhere along the line, when "downramping" these stocks, they realised, that the negative sentiment being created, was actually influencing the share price (such was the reach and use, of HC, by retail investors).
At some further point, either the managers or owners, of HC, or associates of theirs, saw the opportunity, to make money from the influence of HC on retail holders.
This is where, paid downramping and trolling, became used as a tool, beyond their "conflict model", on select "target companies" to make money, using the leverage of shorting.
At some further point again, the pinning of ***************** articles, was added to the mix, using tabloidly, derogatory, inventive and dramatic journalism, to cast the company in a bad light and negatively impact sentiment.
This pinning is always accompanied by, an increase in shorting, as well as an increase in both paid "intelligent?" downrampers and less intelligent, troll minions, aimed at disrupting and overpowering, constructive discussions on the threads, of the target company.
This appears to have been a successful strategy, as TMH revenues, dramatically increased, from full year 2020, to full year 2021.
That is until, they encountered Brainchip.
But of course, the story of this hypothesis, of TMH or associates, shorting BRN in particular, while using HC and articles published by TMH, as tools to manipulate the market, is not over yet..
I want to stress, that this is just a hypothesis, nothing more!
I would however, appreciate any help, from anyone, with links to similar articles and the dates they were pinned, onto other stocks, for further study
I remember someone saying Novonix (NVX) has also been a target?
My opinions only.
I'd like to add, that I do condone plagiarism, of my posts, should this end up on HC
Last edited:
FF, I am Sladius, there is no one like me LOL. But I get what you are saying. Coincidently, I went on to the AVZ thread earlier today for the purpose of learning more about the lithium market (not necessarily to directly invest in it). I think as TSEx grows, Zeebot will have an opportunity to expand TSEx's wings. A TSEx educational hub could well be a popular addition. There are already so many clever TSEx members covering expertise in many areas. It would be great if their knowledge could be captured and shared. I'd be more than happy to be included in discussions on what this kind of online hub might look like (between drinks of course). FF, while I have your attention I have been thinking that BRN shareholders could benefit from another thread, which I am kind of hoping you will kick start, as you have already covered the topic on Crapper. A 'BRN Shareholder's Strategy' thread. We all have plans, are making plans, or should have plans. You have spoken about this before. There are a lot of factors that come in when trying to figure out a plan. When I hear of shareholders saying they are going to hold for 20 years, all I can think of is that would buy me a great funeral. There are so many factors to consider when making such a plan: age, family, tax, financial goals etc, etc. It would be great to read about the different strategies that BRN shareholder's have.
Fact Finder
Top 20
Or at the top of any of the thread pages if you click on the blue "Brainchip Holdings Ltd" it takes you there as well.
hamilton66
Regular
D, thanks for ur reply, and effort in it. Much of it goes over my head. Does however sound like they have plenty of problems to solve before it even becomes a viable option. Certainly no competition in the forseeable future. Have to admit, I'm hanging for a bit of meaty news from mgt. S/P aside, I'd just love to see BRN continue to shore up it's bona fides as a co, and smack down the detractors. A bonfire of burning shorts would also widen my grin.
GLTA
Fox151
Regular
Love your work Dingo. This is a pretty succinct and reasonable assessment. Typical of the finance industry - start with a reasonably justifiable model, then find an advantage, abuse it, and end up in a position where you're committing potential criminal offences. Allegedly.I've just posted this on the TMH thread and am reposting it here, as it may be of interest, to BRN holders
I have a hypothesis, on how THH runs hotcrapper, which is along the lines of..
At some point, hotcrapper (from now on HC) decided a "conflict model", was a good way to increase discussions and forum visits.
Paid employees of HC, were given assignments, to debate and offer alternative views, on popular companies, to increase posts and discussion, increasing traffic and making advertising, more attractive to marketers.
Somewhere along the line, when "downramping" these stocks, they realised, that the negative sentiment being created, was actually influencing the share price (such was the reach and use, of HC, by retail investors).
At some further point, either the managers or owners, of HC, or associates of theirs, saw the opportunity, to make money from the influence of HC on retail holders.
This is where, paid downramping and trolling, became used as a tool, beyond their "conflict model", on select "target companies" to make money, using the leverage of shorting.
At some further point again, the pinning of ***************** articles, was added to the mix, using tabloidly, derogatory, inventive and dramatic journalism, to cast the company in a bad light and negatively impact sentiment.
This pinning is always accompanied by, an increase in shorting, as well as an increase in both paid "intelligent?" downrampers and less intelligent, troll minions, aimed at disrupting and overpowering, constructive discussions on the threads, of the target company.
This appears to have been a successful strategy, as TMH revenues, dramatically increased, from full year 2020, to full year 2021.
That is until, they encountered Brainchip.
But of course, the story of this hypothesis, of TMH or associates, shorting BRN in particular, while using HC and articles published by TMH, as a tool to manipulate the market, is not over yet..
I want to stress, that this is just a hypothesis, nothing more!
I would however, appreciate any help, from anyone, with links to similar articles and the dates they were pinned, onto other stocks, for further study
I remember someone saying Novonix (NVX) has also been a target?
My opinions only.
I'd like to add, that I do condone plagiarism, of my posts, should this end up on HC
Fact Finder
Top 20
Hi Dio
You could also use the 200 billion dollars worth of semiconductors predicted to be used in Electric Vehicles by 2040 to run your 10% on. The rubbery nature of the numbers and the lack of detail in the reports I have read led me to my 1% idea.
I think we would both agree with the statement by Ken Scarince that AKIDA is going to disrupt industries that do not exist yet and so it really is a great big fun game we can play.
The 60 billion is the edge market. What about the comments by Rob Lincourt of having a neural processor like AKIDA in data centres offloading the so called current Ai processing. That market will exist even when AKIDA dominates at the edge.
I think the numbers are just so big and so able to change at a moments notice as the World gets serious about 2030, 2040, 2050 and with a whole lot of luck 2060 that what ever the market is at this precise moment in time it will be a little bigger in the next precise moment in time.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
Hi Barrel. Sorry mate that legendary username just sticks with me. Regardless of our quota the general consensus is moving north. I’m not underestimating what’s at stake here. The best part about being a holder over the last four years is the trial and tribulations. 2020 in February and I’m down some 70 percent in my holding and clawing into the ground not giving up. Today up 1500 percent and I feel like Andy in the Shawshenk redemption crawling through a pile of shit and coming clean out the other side like James Bond in an Armani suit. Time can only tell how big this gets.
Dijon101
Regular
I've just posted this on the TMH thread and am reposting it here, as it may be of interest, to BRN holders
I have a hypothesis, on how THH runs hotcrapper, which is along the lines of..
At some point, hotcrapper (from now on HC) decided a "conflict model", was a good way to increase discussions and forum visits.
Paid employees of HC, were given assignments, to debate and offer alternative views, on popular companies, to increase posts and discussion, increasing traffic and making advertising, more attractive to marketers.
Somewhere along the line, when "downramping" these stocks, they realised, that the negative sentiment being created, was actually influencing the share price (such was the reach and use, of HC, by retail investors).
At some further point, either the managers or owners, of HC, or associates of theirs, saw the opportunity, to make money from the influence of HC on retail holders.
This is where, paid downramping and trolling, became used as a tool, beyond their "conflict model", on select "target companies" to make money, using the leverage of shorting.
At some further point again, the pinning of ***************** articles, was added to the mix, using tabloidly, derogatory, inventive and dramatic journalism, to cast the company in a bad light and negatively impact sentiment.
This pinning is always accompanied by, an increase in shorting, as well as an increase in both paid "intelligent?" downrampers and less intelligent, troll minions, aimed at disrupting and overpowering, constructive discussions on the threads, of the target company.
This appears to have been a successful strategy, as TMH revenues, dramatically increased, from full year 2020, to full year 2021.
That is until, they encountered Brainchip.
But of course, the story of this hypothesis, of TMH or associates, shorting BRN in particular, while using HC and articles published by TMH, as a tool to manipulate the market, is not over yet..
I want to stress, that this is just a hypothesis, nothing more!
I would however, appreciate any help, from anyone, with links to similar articles and the dates they were pinned, onto other stocks, for further study
I remember someone saying Novonix (NVX) has also been a target?
My opinions only.
I'd like to add, that I do condone plagiarism, of my posts, should this end up on HC
I can actually remember the previous owner of hotcrapper posting on a stock thread on Facebook.
This is totally from memory so don't crucify me if I get the details wrong. however the details of his post was something along the lines of:
When he started hotcrapper the average return on investment was something like 90% profit
After he sold the return on investment dropped to 30% profit.
Basically hotcrapper was started by a group of individuals as a place for retail investors to share information.
It became successful and was bought out.
Just a hunch, but it was bought out to manipulate and lessen the profits for retail investors.
Jumpchooks
Regular
Am I knaieve
Dang Son
Regular
Hi DingoI've just posted this on the TMH thread and am reposting it here, as it may be of interest, to BRN holders
I have a hypothesis, on how TMH runs hotcrapper, which is along the lines of..
At some point, hotcrapper (from now on HC) decided a "conflict model", was a good way to increase discussions and forum visits.
Paid employees of HC, were given assignments, to debate and offer alternative views, on popular companies, to increase posts and discussion, increasing traffic and making advertising, more attractive to marketers.
Somewhere along the line, when "downramping" these stocks, they realised, that the negative sentiment being created, was actually influencing the share price (such was the reach and use, of HC, by retail investors).
At some further point, either the managers or owners, of HC, or associates of theirs, saw the opportunity, to make money from the influence of HC on retail holders.
This is where, paid downramping and trolling, became used as a tool, beyond their "conflict model", on select "target companies" to make money, using the leverage of shorting.
At some further point again, the pinning of ***************** articles, was added to the mix, using tabloidly, derogatory, inventive and dramatic journalism, to cast the company in a bad light and negatively impact sentiment.
This pinning is always accompanied by, an increase in shorting, as well as an increase in both paid "intelligent?" downrampers and less intelligent, troll minions, aimed at disrupting and overpowering, constructive discussions on the threads, of the target company.
This appears to have been a successful strategy, as TMH revenues, dramatically increased, from full year 2020, to full year 2021.
That is until, they encountered Brainchip.
But of course, the story of this hypothesis, of TMH or associates, shorting BRN in particular, while using HC and articles published by TMH, as a tool to manipulate the market, is not over yet..
I want to stress, that this is just a hypothesis, nothing more!
I would however, appreciate any help, from anyone, with links to similar articles and the dates they were pinned, onto other stocks, for further study
I remember someone saying Novonix (NVX) has also been a target?
My opinions only.
I'd like to add, that I do condone plagiarism, of my posts, should this end up on HC
I suggest communicate with and maybe email your hypothesis to Stock Swami asking is there anything he could add on the topic. He hates HC and would know heap
I was imagining jam sanger rounding up all the village idiot's in his vicinity to share in his high roller festivities in return for stock bashing loyalty
I think S Swami was sued by sanger for Twitter slander couple years ago. Not sure how it ended
Good riddance to bad rubbish, green day tomorrow will get them scrambling I am a long-term holder from AZK days. I rarely post, but for many years I have read the daily threads on hotcrapper and have been extremely grateful for the insights and valuable information so generously provided by the 1000 eyes. Up until recently of course, when the daily read became a chore.
Living in the UK, I have set my sights on attending the $10 party, and hope to thank many of the contributors in person and buy them a beer or two. This led me to wonder, how many beers @zeeb0t would have to drink for setting up this wonderful resource.
I have absolutely no idea of the time, effort or cost involved in putting this together in such a short space of time, let alone the ongoing administration. I just wanted to say that as I can’t buy you a beer yet @zeeb0t, if you were ever inclined to set up a GoFundMe account to help with admin costs, I would be happy to contribute, as I am sure would many others.
Your considerable efforts are much appreciated.
Living in the UK, I have set my sights on attending the $10 party, and hope to thank many of the contributors in person and buy them a beer or two. This led me to wonder, how many beers @zeeb0t would have to drink for setting up this wonderful resource.
I have absolutely no idea of the time, effort or cost involved in putting this together in such a short space of time, let alone the ongoing administration. I just wanted to say that as I can’t buy you a beer yet @zeeb0t, if you were ever inclined to set up a GoFundMe account to help with admin costs, I would be happy to contribute, as I am sure would many others.
Your considerable efforts are much appreciated.
DUDINVESTOR
Emerged
Hello sane chippers.
My main gripe about the SP nosedive is that I'd emptied my piggy bank buying on the way down and was skint when it hit 3 cents.
Hi Brubaker,
Akida SoC does have an ARM Cortex processor built in. This is used for set-up/configuration, but is not used when the NN is doing its thing classifying/recognizing input signals.
The ARM Cortex is not part of the Akida IP licence arrangement, so licencees do have to provide their own processor for set-up and to make use of the results.
Similar threads
