..........what garbage are you posting on here now, $3 a share, it would be nice if they would sell some IP licenses instead, not just rattle on like a rat in the cupboard...
You should re read my post. Its simply a reply to a post outlining a breakdown of a future offer of $3 per share using information available
Its a reply to some one who
..........what garbage are you posting on here now, $3 a share, it would be nice if they would sell some IP licenses instead, not just rattle on like a rat in the cupboard...
I an very surprised that you do not understand the simple maths involved in the calculations using available information.
I note that you have not presented any substance to back up your statement.
Let me break the simple calculations down again to help you understand.
PE RATIO = Share price divided by Earnings per share. In this case $3 is the Share price, PE ratio used is 30.
Earnings per share therefore = $3 divided by 30 = 10 cents/share.
The buyer is paying =2 billion SOI x $3/share = $6 billion.
EPS of 10 cents/share with a 2 billion SOI = 2,000,000,000 x 10 cents = $200,000,000 earnings.
Sean is on record stating that an IP Model has a net margin of circa 90%.
That implies that a net earnings of $200mill will come from circa $222 million revenue (200mill x (100divided by90)).
So a future $3 offer with an assumption of a reasonable PE growth company 30 and Sean's IP Model of 90% margin the buyer would by paying:
$6 bill for an expected $222 mill pa which translates into an expected $200 mill earnings pa. The buyers gamble is whether it can expand growth rates.
Holders take $3 per share.
You can play with the calculations. All you have to do is change the expected PE ratio, offer amount and Sean's expected net margins.
As i said simple maths. I hope this helps.