BRN Discussion Ongoing

Quiltman

Regular
Drove to work with my son (25) this morning.
We are both BRN shareholders, his holding while small(ish), is significant to him.

What's going on with BrainChip he asked, is their tech any good ?

My answer, big picture view ... the conversation went something like this.

If you have truly disruptive, innovative tech ... who do you think would show interest, and in what order.

Pre anything - Evangelists, blue sky thinkers, and evangelist shareholders ( include myself in this group ).

First,
- Universities, research institutes ... a whole bunch of professors, PHD's and boffins running comparative studies, and publishing papers, demonstrating clear advantages of the tech.

Second,
- Something like space research and applications. Looking for highly disruptive technologies, high value, high intellect applying the tech - not consumer products ( far to risky )

Two big ticks there.

Next ... and Third,

- most likely a company/companies that have been working with the tech for several years, and have developed a high level of knowledge, trust and comfort. The tech is disruptive, but almost by definition also dangerous ( what happens if we get it wrong ! ). Start with one or two categories that this company has identified as large opportunities where the tech delivers a distinct advantage.

- for me , this sounds like TATA ( medical applications/ industrial ), and possibly Merc.

Fourth,

The company above ( TATA ? ) having successfully delivered proof of concept to mass market, encourages those companies that have been developing similar tech & applications with the confidence to follow.

Fifth,

The floodgates open.


....

So, I actually think we are on track.
The timelines have not met the expectations of many, but I believe the path to commercialisation is a predictable one - and we are on it.

Hopefully, before the end of the year, TATA has shown their hand and commitment.

So, I said to my son, tech is fine, let the process do it's thing.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 73 users

Diogenese

Top 20
Here's an interesting idea. You know how we all hear these sci-fi stories about AI wiping out mankind because of the damage it's doing to the world. How about AI committing suicide after finding out what it's doing.
To adapt the words of Sir Edward Coke in the case of Sutton's Hospital:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_of_Sutton's_Hospital

And it is great reason that an Artificial Intelligence in expectancy or intendment, or nomination, shall be sufficient to support the name of an Incorporation, when the Artificial Intelligence itself is onely in abstracto, and resteth onely in intendment and consideration of the model; for an Artificial Intelligence aggregate of many is invisible, immortal, & resteth only in intendment and consideration of the model; and therefore[1] cannot have predecessor nor successor.[2] They may not commit treason, nor be outlawed, nor excommunicate, for they have no souls, neither can they appear in person, but by programmer.[3] An Artificial Intelligence aggregate of many cannot do fealty, for an invisible body cannot be in person, nor can swear,[4] it is not subject to imbecilities*, or death of the natural body, and divers other cases.

* Really?
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
  • Love
  • Wow
Reactions: 8 users

Shadow59

Regular
To adapt the words of Sir Edward Coke in the case of Sutton's Hospital:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_of_Sutton's_Hospital

And it is great reason that an Artificial Intelligence in expectancy or intendment, or nomination, shall be sufficient to support the name of an Incorporation, when the Artificial Intelligence itself is onely in abstracto, and resteth onely in intendment and consideration of the Law; for an Artificial Intelligence aggregate of many is invisible, immortal, & resteth only in intendment and consideration of the Law; and therefore[1] cannot have predecessor nor successor.[2] They may not commit treason, nor be outlawed, nor excommunicate, for they have no souls, neither can they appear in person, but by Attorney.[3] An Artificial Intelligence aggregate of many cannot do fealty, for an invisible body cannot be in person, nor can swear,[4] it is not subject to imbecilities*, or death of the natural body, and divers other cases.

* Really?
I can see you had a lot of fun with that!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 2 users
What chance is BRN going into the Nintendo switch 2 ?.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
What chance is BRN going into the Nintendo switch 2 ?.
Signed a IP Licence some years ago what do you reckon
 

rgupta

Regular
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

BJ65

Emerged
What chance is BRN going into the Nintendo switch 2 ?.
I think that we stand a bigger chance of being in Sony PS5…

“With the power of the PS5 Pro console, compatible games can be played at 60fps, or up to 120fps, with Ray Tracing and AI-enhanced 4K resolution using PSSR—all at the same time—on your 4K TV.”
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 9 users
  • Wow
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 3 users
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
  • Like
  • Thinking
  • Haha
Reactions: 6 users
  • Haha
  • Fire
Reactions: 3 users
What are you taking about?..
Obviously we're excluded from that right! 😉👍
Well most of us on here. There are a couple that are sus. 😂🤣😀

SC
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users

itsol4605

Regular
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 3 users
That’s exactly what is the correct answer, fingers crossed. Lots of speculation and very difficult to guess.
I think it’s more of a yeah na
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users

7für7

Top 20
What are you taking about?..
Obviously we're excluded from that right! 😉👍
1726528745001.gif
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Haha
Reactions: 3 users
Thinking out aloud and knowing BRN IP can be upgraded over time it would make sense for Nintendo to be involved now somehow as each model seemed to be years apart when launched. Guessing only tho.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Plenty going on with Intel at the moment, good read:

 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 7 users

MegaportX

Regular
This is a thread I found fis discussing Nintendo Switch 2. Interesting that last post claims it has 48 Tensor Cores.

https://www.neogaf.com/threads/repo...ight-not-be-as-powerful-as-it-sounds.1663729/

SC
48 Tensor Cores is a feature of some NVIDIA graphics processing units (GPUs), specifically those based on the Ampere and later architectures. Tensor Cores are specialized cores designed to accelerate matrix operations, which are a fundamental component of deep learning and artificial intelligence (AI) workloads.

Tensor Cores are optimized for performing mixed-precision matrix operations, which are commonly used in deep learning models. They can perform operations such as matrix multiplication, convolution, and batch normalization, among others.

The presence of 48 Tensor Cores in a GPU indicates that it is capable of handling demanding AI and deep learning workloads, such as:

  • Training and inference of large neural networks
  • Accelerating scientific simulations and data analysis
  • Enhancing graphics rendering and physics simulations in games and professional applications
GPUs with 48 Tensor Cores are typically found in high-end consumer and professional-grade graphics cards, as well as in datacenter and cloud computing environments.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 10 users
Top Bottom