CHIPS
Regular
But why not?
I would return your teddy to you almost brandneu looking.
Last edited:
But why not?
On ignore you go, bye byeThe fact that you judge my knowledge based on how many comments I wrote in here says it all about you Ive been invested since 2020 and follows everything this company is doing. My patience with Sean is gone. He almost had 3 years to make us succeed. The technology should literally sell itself. I respect if people want him to stay but I think new blood is necessary
The fact that you judge my knowledge based on how many comments I wrote in here says it all about you Ive been invested since 2020 and follows everything this company is doing. My patience with Sean is gone. He almost had 3 years to make us succeed. The technology should literally sell itself. I respect if people want him to stay but I think new blood is necessary
i must have missed this one thanks @Rach2512On ignore you go, bye bye
Why don’t you ask the company directlyWould anyone kindly like to discuss if these new chiplet designs could include BRN ?
That means shorters buy those shares sold by company. It is good and bad in a sense. Good in the way short is almost over. Bad in the mean they can come back again as they have won the 1st lottery and secondly, management had given a middle finger to long term holders and supported the shorters.I did post yesterdey that the 50 mill that disappeared from the shorts overnight could have been used in this way and now it’s making a bit more sense. Be good to find out if it was the case
View attachment 67507
I did via LinkedIn with no response
I know hence the earlier response lolI did via LinkedIn with no response
Does feel that way which is probably not the case which says a lot about management atmThat means shorters buy those shares sold by company. It is good and bad in a sense. Good in the way short is almost over. Bad in the mean they can come back again as they have won the 1st lottery and secondly, management had given a middle finger
By the way what are the chances management is involved through their own friends in shorting and bringing the sp down and now providing them new shares at almost one third of cost.
Dyor
If I remember well, if you take the offer and buy the shares, you have to hold minimum 1 year. So, one year of possible Healy grow with less shorts. ?That means shorters buy those shares sold by company. It is good and bad in a sense. Good in the way short is almost over. Bad in the mean they can come back again as they have won the 1st lottery and secondly, management had given a middle finger to long term holders and supported the shorters.
But definitely now the company is becoming professional and start making the same tricks other companies make.
By the way what are the chances management is involved through their own friends in shorting and bringing the sp down and now providing them new shares at almost one third of cost.
Dyor
I don't think the retail shareholder CR will fail, as it's only 3 million dollars AUD.
Multiple shorter accounts, will happily soak them up, to lock in bets that are in the money, as genuine selling, is not in large volumes.
The main 20 million AUD CR is fully underwritten by Capital, meaning it's guaranteed in the bag.
The 2 million AUD from LDA sale of shares, is also fully underwritten.
All before costs.
I'd reckon Dingo's mainly worried about the "stickiness" quotient upon return.But why not?
I would return your teddy to you almost brandneu looking.
Never heard like that.If I remember well, if you take the offer and buy the shares, you have to hold minimum 1 year. So, one year of possible Healy grow with less shorts. ?
So if the shorters did not buy the shares on market then how they get 50 million in a day and what motivate them to return the same. There is another possibility 50 million was shorted by one group only.Does feel that way which is probably not the case which says a lot about management atm
View attachment 67518