DingoBorat
Slim
Lending, is not selling, 7..If I remember well, if you take the offer and buy the shares, you have to hold minimum 1 year. So, one year of possible Healy grow with less shorts. ?
You should know that..
Lending, is not selling, 7..If I remember well, if you take the offer and buy the shares, you have to hold minimum 1 year. So, one year of possible Healy grow with less shorts. ?
I was 100% sure I was reading it like thisLending, is not selling, 7..
You should know that..
They nearly had my $10k and I’m guessing you’re awaiting to attack the company? As the only person @diagnose or should I say an employee of BrainChip who might have been happy to purchase at that price for the good of the company, so I’d be surprised if they do. Maybe the company could sell them to the shorters if they don’t manage to sell them.Can't wait to see if the SPP offered to us small retail SH will be exhausted. It would be a great sign if it does.
Would also be good to know Sean's movements to get an idea who is he engaging with.
Are shorters shareholders?I don't think the retail shareholder CR will fail, as it's only 3 million dollars AUD.
Multiple shorter accounts, will happily soak them up, to lock in bets that are in the money, as genuine selling, is not in large volumes.
The main 20 million AUD CR is fully underwritten by Capital, meaning it's guaranteed in the bag.
The 2 million AUD from LDA sale of shares, is also fully underwritten.
All before costs.
Only actual shareholders are invited to the SPP party.With the share prices where they are, the next thing we know is that the CR will fail as potential shareholders would rather buy on exchange at 18c (and falling) as opposed to a direct issue at 19.3c. Existing SOI and new shares are pari-passu. Unless we already have a cornerstone investor for the CR (not likely given the wording of the ASX releases), or the share prices spike, this is bound to happen.
Worst case scenario that will leave us with barely 4Q of runway and then contracts will not be signed due to inadequate capitalisation, corporate "white knight" enters and scoops up our tech for a steal.
I'm sorry but management really needs to be disinfected from the top... and pronto.
Record date for "shareholder" participation, was 7pm on the 24 of July.Are shorters shareholders?
What I mean is, shorters borrow shares, so they have some sort of "lease" agreement with the lender, but the lender is the owner.
So shorters would not be eligible for the SPP, unless they were shorting stocks which they owned separately - still nothing would surprise ...
What if you and I worked for 'separate' fund managers, both holding 25M shares each. We both get a call from UCPS after BRN's AGM in May enquiring if we have any interest in the upcoming CR. Share price around 25cents to be discounted to 19cents. We then do a deal, you borrow my 25M, I borrow yours and now there are 50M shares shorted in BRN. We both take up shares in the placement from UCPS and return the borrowed shares to each other.Record date for "shareholder" participation, was 7pm on the 24 of July.
They would have just had to have bought the minimum trade required and Bingo.
"Hey I'm now a shareholder in BRN and can participate in the SSP!"
Unless they had no prior knowledge of the CR, before the halt, which was on the 23rd of July (SPP offer date 25th of July).
Chinese walls don't whisper?...
Weather you hold a little or a lot, if you've held for over 2 to 3 years, you're entitled to feel pissed off. BRN management have made several public statements over that timeframe indicating that revenue is imminent. Most recently, Sean stated that the company is on the cusp of significant revenue streams. There's a pattern of building up hopeful shareholders and not delivering. You shouldn't be moderating those who feel legitimately pissed off with repeated delays in meaningful revenue. The opportunity cost for long term holders with funds locked in, collectively, is enormous.The question is what some small investors are thinking when they puff themselves up in an anonymous forum and demand the resignation of a CEO of a company where they are simply hoping to get rich through the efforts of others (employees) or, depending on how much they have invested, to make some profit. Don't they realize they are overestimating themselves? That it is just ridiculous? There are investors who have invested multiples of what they have and are more relaxed... probably because they haven't put everything on one horse. I don't know how many times I've mentioned it... but because of such annoying small investors, publicly traded companies often like to use tactics to get rid of them through reverse splits... the sad part is that the patient ones get affected too... just hold still or sell if something doesn't suit you... everything else is unnecessary and annoying. If someone think he have the knowledge to change something, feel free to apply as an CEO at brainchip… otherwise STFU
I don’t have problems with people who are disappointed because they thought they would see significant revenue this year. However, if you follow the AI edge segment, you will find many reports predicting significant developments from 2025 onwards. What I have an issue with are the people who come here and make nonsensical statements like “Sean should be fired,” or “he shouldn’t get any more shares,” or “fire him and her and him.”Weather you hold a little or a lot, if you've held for over 2 to 3 years, you're entitled to feel pissed off. BRN management have made several public statements over that timeframe indicating that revenue is imminent. Most recently, Sean stated that the company is on the cusp of significant revenue streams. There's a pattern of building up hopeful shareholders and not delivering. You shouldn't be moderating those who feel legitimately pissed off with repeated delays in meaningful revenue. The opportunity cost for long term holders with funds locked in, collectively, is enormous.
Be careful I just got a warning for my response as it wasn’t in English lolI don’t have problems with people who are disappointed because they thought they would see significant revenue this year. However, if you follow the AI edge segment, you will find many reports predicting significant developments from 2025 onwards. What I have an issue with are the people who come here and make nonsensical statements like “Sean should be fired,” or “he shouldn’t get any more shares,” or “fire him and her and him.”
I've said it often: we cannot change anything here. So why don't you go to the BrainChip headquarters, phone them, or write an email directly? I’ll tell you why not: because these are the type of guys who watch a football match and complain about the players on the field while they sit on the couch, drinking beer, unable to move because of their weight. Best examples are from crapper T&J tball the dean etc …
I think this is in EnglishWeather you hold a little or a lot, if you've held for over 2 to 3 years, you're entitled to feel pissed off. BRN management have made several public statements over that timeframe indicating that revenue is imminent. Most recently, Sean stated that the company is on the cusp of significant revenue streams. There's a pattern of building up hopeful shareholders and not delivering. You shouldn't be moderating those who feel legitimately pissed off with repeated delays in meaningful revenue. The opportunity cost for long term holders with funds locked in, collectively, is enormous.
Can't have a civilised discussion anymore.Blow it out your ass, dick wad
wow, your on fire DKCan't have a civilised discussion anymore.
Samsung does a lot of work on analog ReRAM.2024 Neo QLED AI TV - More Wow than ever | Samsung Australia
Explore the latest Samsung Neo QLED AI TV with cutting-edge technologies. Compare the specs and features of various Samsung's Neo QLED TV models.www.samsung.com