BRN Discussion Ongoing

Those reports have shown many time an increase in more shorts then actual shares traded to so this whole short reporting insuspect in my opinion just another black box they must be under a NDA.
You can just go to the ASIC short reports website.

Though in saying that, their disclaimers etc instill very little confidence in the transparency and legitimacy of the numbers.

Kinda like just using an effen dartboard to put the numbers together.

If you can't audit trail or provide a legit compliance framework and process to hold those who short to account, then why bother at all.

Loan out your stocks / short....oh well, let's just work on the honesty system...in the stock market....yeah right :rolleyes: :mad:



Screenshot_2024-08-02-19-56-11-19_4641ebc0df1485bf6b47ebd018b5ee76.jpg
 
  • Fire
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

IloveLamp

Top 20
Apologies if posted already

1000017527.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 7 users

GazDix

Regular
Evening DingoBorat ,

Yep , I started getting the very same feeling some time ago.

Hence how I voted at the AGM .

Regards,
Esq.
Actually, with all that's going on, I'm beginning to wonder, if all the mistakes, the most recent bad one (that Im aware of) being our new marketing manager's first slide spelling Australian wrong (which is something that could possibly be overlooked and be genuine) but getting the ASX stock code wrong??
BRD instead of BRN??

Are these deliberate mistakes, to deter investors and help out particular parties??

I'm losing confidence in particular areas of management, of this Company.

That's not to say BrainChip and AKIDA won't be successful, but it looks increasingly like fishy things are happening, behind close doors and under the table, for the express benefit of other parties.

For me there has been no doubt since Sean has come on board.

But this is the game. Give you hope. Get rid of the retail with Mercedes pump and dump. Get rid of more us pesky retail who research by not using the ASX at all with non PS Anns.
Next is silence. The odd patent here and there. Exhaust long term holders. There is only so many SOI to be taken and it seems the top 20 take most.

The run down from 50 cents to 40 I think was painful and it was then I knew something wasn't right. The penny dropped. This company's culture changed.

But this isn't new. So I decided long ago to play as an insto but with limited info and funds of course. Once interest rates maybe are confirmed to go lower in September in the US and liquidity comes back to finance the monstrous debt bill and we swim in money but Brainchip sits in silence. I can't see a way out as momentum will take any potential gains away hence the CR recently too I suppose. Our time is really soon or never IMO.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Thinking
Reactions: 4 users
For me there has been no doubt since Sean has come on board.

But this is the game. Give you hope. Get rid of the retail with Mercedes pump and dump. Get rid of more us pesky retail who research by not using the ASX at all with non PS Anns.
Next is silence. The odd patent here and there. Exhaust long term holders. There is only so many SOI to be taken and it seems the top 20 take most.

The run down from 50 cents to 40 I think was painful and it was then I knew something wasn't right. The penny dropped. This company's culture changed.

But this isn't new. So I decided long ago to play as an insto but with limited info and funds of course. Once interest rates maybe are confirmed to go lower in September in the US and liquidity comes back to finance the monstrous debt bill and we swim in money but Brainchip sits in silence. I can't see a way out as momentum will take any potential gains away hence the CR recently too I suppose. Our time is really soon or never IMO.

With the share prices where they are, the next thing we know is that the CR will fail as potential shareholders would rather buy on exchange at 18c (and falling) as opposed to a direct issue at 19.3c. Existing SOI and new shares are pari-passu. Unless we already have a cornerstone investor for the CR (not likely given the wording of the ASX releases), or the share prices spike, this is bound to happen.

Worst case scenario that will leave us with barely 4Q of runway and then contracts will not be signed due to inadequate capitalisation, corporate "white knight" enters and scoops up our tech for a steal.

I'm sorry but management really needs to be disinfected from the top... and pronto.
 
Last edited:
  • Thinking
  • Fire
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

DK6161

Regular
Be patient peeps. New podcast coming next week to hopefully answer some of our questions or reveal whats in the works.
My guess is a guest from a potential partner, highlighting some of the potential advantages of using lower-power edge AI
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 2 users
With the share prices where they are, the next thing we know is that the CR will fail as potential shareholders would rather buy on exchange at 18c as opposed to a direct issue at 19.3c. SOI and new shares are pari-passu.

I'm sorry but management really needs to be disinfected from the top... and pronto.
I don't think the retail shareholder CR will fail, as it's only 3 million dollars AUD.

Multiple shorter accounts, will happily soak them up, to lock in bets that are in the money, as genuine selling, is not in large volumes.

The main 20 million AUD CR is fully underwritten by Capital, meaning it's guaranteed in the bag.

The 2 million AUD from LDA sale of shares, is also fully underwritten.

All before costs.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 15 users
Be patient peeps. New podcast coming next week to hopefully answer some of our questions or reveal whats in the works.
My guess is a guest from a potential partner, highlighting some of the potential advantages of using lower-power edge AI

There are 39 podcasts on the BC website and not a single one of them has ever had any effect on share price. Most of them are more like eavesdropping on them having coffee with an acquaintance, who usually doesn't even seem well acquainted with Akida (of course there were a few exceptions). Unfortunately Sean's lingo is what I call the "use vague feel-good language and delay expectations" corporate speak, I've seen many managers like him in my time in the corporate world unfortunately.

He did tell us to judge him by the numbers though, so that is what I am doing. The numbers are dismal, and the quarterly revenue run rate of US$48k (x4 = $192k) isn't even enough to pay 1/13th of his salary of US$2.58M.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Fire
Reactions: 6 users

genyl

Emerged
And who are you? What a load of bollocks.
I am someone with enough brain capacity to understand that Sean has to go. Not my fault you are one of the slow ones. He will deliver nothing. Wait and see.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 2 users

CHIPS

Regular
I am someone with enough brain capacity to understand that Sean has to go. Not my fault you are one of the slow ones. He will deliver nothing. Wait and see.

You posted 4 comments here since you joined on July 24 and think you know it all?


Lol GIF
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Fire
Reactions: 9 users
There are 39 podcasts on the BC website and not a single one of them has ever had any effect on share price. Most of them are more like eavesdropping on them having coffee with an acquaintance, who usually doesn't even seem well acquainted with Akida (of course there were a few exceptions). Unfortunately Sean's lingo is what I call the "use vague feel-good language and delay expectations" corporate speak, I've seen many managers like him in my time in the corporate world unfortunately.

He did tell us to judge him by the numbers though, so that is what I am doing. The numbers are dismal, and the quarterly revenue run rate of US$48k (x4 = $192k) isn't even enough to pay 1/13th of his salary of US$2.58M.
To be fair, you can't extrapolate from a poor first quarter, of a Company that is still in the early stages of commercialisation and basically still pre-revenue.

When revenue does start flowing, it will be increasing each quarter and may never plateau.

Sean indicated, that we are on the cusp of sustainable revenue streams (and I'm currently clinging to those words like a small child to his teddy bear).

Screenshot_20240803-005531_Firefox.jpg



The miserable 48000k, may be the start of this (in spite of the previous quarter showing double).
Or it could just be from Edge Box pre-orders..

Revenues will start with a trickle, but will continually build.
We will only show large jumps/lumps of revenue, with IP licence fees.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 11 users

CHIPS

Regular
To be fair, you can't extrapolate from a poor first quarter, of a Company that is still in the early stages of commercialisation and basically still pre-revenue.

When revenue does start flowing, it will be increasing each quarter and may never plateau.

Sean indicated, that we are on the cusp of sustainable revenue streams (and I'm currently clinging to those words like a small child to his teddy bear).

View attachment 67506


The miserable 48000k, may be the start of this (in spite of the previous quarter showing double).
Or it could just be from Edge Box pre-orders..

Revenues will start with a trickle, but will continually build.
We will only show large jumps/lumps of revenue, with IP licence fees.

Can I hold your teddy too, please? I am sad 😢
I need a hug after this week's endless bloodbath at the stock market and urgently need BrainChip to succeed soon.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Haha
Reactions: 7 users
Can I hold your teddy too, please? I am sad 😢
I need a hug after this week's endless bloodbath at the stock market and urgently need BrainChip to succeed soon.
No.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 12 users

Dallas

Regular
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 23 users

genyl

Emerged
You posted 4 comments here since you joined on July 24 and think you know it all?


Lol GIF
The fact that you judge my knowledge based on how many comments I wrote in here says it all about you 🤡 Ive been invested since 2020 and follows everything this company is doing. My patience with Sean is gone. He almost had 3 years to make us succeed. The technology should literally sell itself. I respect if people want him to stay but I think new blood is necessary
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 3 users

KiKi

Regular
  • Sad
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 3 users

Kachoo

Regular
Frangipani, came up with this at the time, which seems fairly logical, from book, I mean post #85,572

"Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe that customer list should therefore read:

  1. Renesas
  2. Megachips
  3. Ford
  4. Mercedes
  5. Vorago
  6. NASA
  7. Valeo
  8. ISL
  9. ???
  10. ???
Which leaves us with only two mystery customers that fall into the category of either being an EAP customer or have used Akida technology to develop a proof of concept, as we would have found out about any additional IP licensees via price-sensitive ASX announcements"


I questioned whether Ford could still be considered a customer, as we have heard nothing, since LDN days.
I would go on thebside that ford still is. Remember Airbus was mentioned back in 2017 and only recently surfaced again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
Just all this business with Shaw Brothers, shorting and the Shaw Brothers connection with our new financiers et all.
I did post yesterdey that the 50 mill that disappeared from the shorts overnight could have been used in this way and now it’s making a bit more sense. Be good to find out if it was the case

1722628864802.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Mistakes happen, but, it's not a good look.
Particularly in sales, the adage is, that you only get one chance at a first impression.
These stupid errors keep on occurring and they should be getting this stuff proofed, before it's released.
Particularly when we are prowling for the eye's of a partner who would then be contemplating getting into bed with us, and will be relying upon us to provide efficient and effective implementation and ongoing support.
I could do a better job and that’s really saying something

1722629126354.gif
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 5 users

Tothemoon24

Top 20
FORBESINNOVATIONAI

Real-Time AI At The Edge May Require A New Network Solution​

Jim McGregor
Contributor
Tirias ResearchContributor Group
Follow





0
Aug 2, 2024,11:10am EDT
Ede network Image

The complexity of edge networks
BRAINCHIP
AI has the power to change every electronic platform, but what works in the data center may not work in an industrial edge platform like a security camera, robotic arm, or even a vehicle. There is no one-size-fits-all for edge AI because of space, power, data security, and performance-latency requirements, which means there is not one solution for all AI applications. Transitioning to edge AI requires new solutions, especially for on-device training.

The Current AI Model​

Most AI models start in the data center with the training of a neural network model based on public and/or private data. As we have argued in the past, the expense of running AI in the cloud can be prohibitive from a cost, latency, and security standpoint. As a result, neural network models can be optimized by shrinking the model size to then run at the edge of the network on the device, commonly referred to as “edge computing.” This optimization is a delicate balance of reducing the size of the model while maintaining acceptable accuracy.


While neural network models and optimization techniques improve, using a scaled-down data center solution may not be optimal for many edge applications. Edge applications are often focused on the input of sensor data and require even smaller models with a high degree of accuracy and real-time, or close to real-time, execution for mission critical or even life-threatening situations. These edge applications may include healthcare, automotive/transportation, manufacturing, and security.

Event-driven AI​

As an alternative, BrainChip has developed its Akida neuromorphic IP (intellectual property) solutions to support Temporal Event-based Neural Networks (TENNs), an event-based neural processing network architecture, in addition to traditional Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) and Transformer based neural networks. What this means is that a temporal (time) enabled neural network (TENN), or networks, is only operating during the time when a trigger event or input occurs. During other times, it is not computing and therefore not consuming much power. This can translate to higher performance, adaptability and lower real-time latency per event, input, or request and at a fraction of the power consumption of other AI solutions.


According to BrainChip, TENNs are ideal for processing various types of data such as one-dimensional time series and spatial-temporal data. TENNs is showing positive results in a number common applications, such as audio denoising, eye-tracking for AR/VR, health data monitoring (heart rate, SpO2), keyword spotting, Small Language Models (SLMs), and video object detection. TENNs ability to adapt to new input/events overcome some of the limitations of traditional neural networks while supporting future neural network models at a fraction of the die area and operating cost.

The Akida technology is available as IP cores that can be integrated into anything from a low-power microcontroller to a high-performance applications processor or system-on-chip (SoC) or discrete accelerator chips. While using an IP solution would require a new design, it provides more efficient processing of TENNs models by taking advantage of sparsity, a key feature that makes the human brain so efficient. Additionally, there are no other off-the-shelf solutions that can provide comparable low-power, high-accuracy, and real-time AI processing.

Edge-Specific AI​

While TOPS (Trillions of Operations Per Second) seem to be getting a lot of attention as a means of measuring the AI performance of a chip, analyzing the performance of Edge AI is better accomplished using metrics that are more specific to the application. Examples of these more application specific metrics include measuring the efficiency of processing frames or frames per second (FPS) for image processing, time to first token (TTFT) for response time, mean average precision (mAP) for accuracy, and Watts or Kilowatts for power consumption. BrainChip has provided some data along these lines to demonstrate the value of TENNs in various applications.


IMG_9340.jpeg


In another demonstration, the company demonstrated how TENNs can be used to drastically reduce the training time by and the power consumed by more than orders of magnitude relative to other large language data sets like GPT-2, which would be more appropriate for embedded applications than the newer models, with equivalent accuracy.

Edge Specific Solutions​

While there is a rush to push AI to every platform and device, scaling down from the data center may not be the best solution for many applications. As we have seen in the past, the unique requirements of devices often drive innovation in new directions, Tirias Research believes the same will hold true for AI as it moves from the datacenter to the edge. But, as with any new technology, success often depends on the benefit over existing solutions. According to BrainChip, the numbers can be very significant, with demonstrations showing up to a 50x reduction in the number of model parameters, up to a 30x reduction in training time, and 5000x reduction in multiple-accumulate (MAC) operations with the same or better accuracy. Improvements in performance and power efficiency scale with model efficiency.
IMG_9341.jpeg

Edge Specific Solutions​

While there is a rush to push AI to every platform and device, scaling down from the data center may not be the best solution for many applications. As we have seen in the past, the unique requirements of devices often drive innovation in new directions, Tirias Research believes the same will hold true for AI as it moves from the datacenter to the edge. But, as with any new technology, success often depends on the benefit over existing solutions. According to BrainChip, the numbers can be very significant, with demonstrations showing up to a 50x reduction in the number of model parameters, up to a 30x reduction in training time, and 5000x reduction in multiple-accumulate (MAC) operations with the same or better accuracy. Improvements in performance and power efficiency scale with model efficiency.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 38 users
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 7 users
Top Bottom