Cosors I fully believe that the SP is being played with but there are many factors that affect it.
The MB pumpbwas 100% overpriced then the big players got it right collected a bunch of shorts and worked the price down.
The price is easily pushed down when there is no new buyers the moment you increase buyers the algorithm pushes up as long as people buy it keeps pushing up. Even with dilution IMO our SP should be north of these level by quite a bit I have I see a value price at 60 cents a while back but with the addition of Tenns I will go north of that but that's strictly my opinion only so it means nothing.
But the biggest play was the way the noise drove people away from this stock the relentless down ramps were quite harsh and well most people don't understand this sector that BRN are in and easily pushed away on what would be viewed as short falls.
As Someone from the company put it they can't wait to show up these negative article writers. What people do not realise that the right deal could move this stock 10 times today's price. This is not thinkable for me cause of the long drop we have seen but the truth is it is possible. At the AGM it was quite the speech by Antonio about profitability and him basicly saying we can talk to any of the top brass in the semiconductor industry and they will listen to us that was the defining moment that says yeah BRN really does have the stuff then are here to deliver. Obviously the company took longer thenthey even thought to get to a comfortable level.
The thing is, the TCI.
I agree with you, there are always many factors and no one only answer.
My comment below refers to this TCI factor.
At the time when the tablecloth wasn't ironed, the ecosystem didn't exist nearly as much as it does today, there weren't nearly as many patents filed, there were no products in testing as today, no university for the foundation of the future sending their students out into the world, no ARM no Intel no - the list is long, the SP was 45% above what it is today and was by no means hyped. Take a look at the chart at the time. Argumentation about applicable factors or not. For a long time I thought of an evil player knitting his plan. Several times I was appeased and I adopted this attitude.
Nevertheless, the SP now is, in my view, largely a result of manipulation, and accordingly has to do with other factors.
I am anyway in love of SNN, TENN, cortical columns, event based and all that stuff.
And I don't give a damn about old tec like Nvidia. I'm still thinking about the photo of a humiliated CEO of the hottest Ai company in the world.
Your creativity and creation with words gets to the heart of the matter. I just call it the TCI factor.
