BRN Discussion Ongoing

[Rach2512]

I totally agree, it only takes a minute!

Think about it the manipulators will say anything to stop you voting, they will be voting, be sure of that. If you want to get back at the manipulators and you believe in
Brainchip then vote for them which in turn votes against the manipulators.

 

[Rach2512]

If you don’t vote it is counted as you agree to all terms and conditions of the AGM that is the fact.

Can you provide details of where it says that please.

 

[TheUnfairAdvantage]

Hi.
Certainly don't want to create any confusion here but it is my understanding that if we do not vote, our votes can and will be used and allocated to the chairman of the meeting to vote the Company line and so will effectively result in a yes vote for all the company recommendations and a no vote to spill, which is how I will be voting anyway.

Is this correct?

My understanding of constitution law and voting at meetings is, if you don’t vote it will be recognised as abstained ie no vote for or against and not counted in either category. You might note in most notices after a meeting ( results of meeting) there are three categories - for, against and abstain. My opinion only.

 

[Smoothsailing]

Can you provide details of where it says that please.

My apologies I just asked Tony and yes you need to vote to be counted

 

[7für7]

If you don’t vote it is counted as you agree to all terms and conditions of the AGM that is the fact.

Is it only in Australia the case?
The principle that uncast votes at shareholder meetings remain unconsidered generally applies to publicly traded companies worldwide. However, there are some differences in the specific regulations and procedures depending on the country and legal framework:

Quorum: The requirements for a quorum can vary by country. In some countries, the quorum may be relatively low, while in others, it may be higher.

Proxy Voting: The options for casting a vote by proxy or mail can vary. Some countries have very strict rules for proxy voting, while others have more flexible procedures.

Majority Requirements: The specific majority requirements for different types of resolutions (e.g., simple majority, qualified majority) can differ.

Minority Protection: Some countries have special protections for minority shareholders to ensure their interests are considered despite low participation rates.

Despite these differences, the fundamental principle remains: if a shareholder does not vote, their vote is not considered, which can influence the outcome of the votes.

 

[Wags]

This also looks very interesting.
Liked by Anil.

Have a read at their website

AONDevices, Inc. on LinkedIn: #tinyml #tinyml

✨ We’re excited to announce that our groundbreaking Always-on Voice, Sound and Sensor Fusion Edge AI Solution, consisting of our AON1120™ Chip…

www.linkedin.com

More interesting.
Aondevices are partner with Dialog semiconductors which was acquired be Renesas in Aug 2021, and uses 2 nodes on the chip?

Renesas Completes Acquisition of Dialog SemiconductorRenesas Electronicshttps://www.renesas.com › about › press-room › renesas-...


Maybe not so interesting after all, apparently "Tain't what you do - it's the way that you do it!"

 

[buena suerte :-)]

My understanding of constitution law and voting at meetings is, if you don’t vote it will be recognised as abstained ie no vote for or against and not counted in either category. You might note in most notices after a meeting ( results of meeting) there are three categories - for, against and abstain. My opinion only.

An example from last year..not voting will count as 'Abstained'

 

[Esq.111]

Can you provide details of where it says that please.

Afternoon Rach2512 ,

First two photos are from the voting slip , I have obscured some parts as these contain private details.

Third photo is from the Notice Of Annual General Meeting regarding , resolution 9 , Conditional Board Spill. , explanatory notes.. page 29.... follow the finger , for the answer one seeks.

Regards,
Esq.

 

[Smoothsailing]

Is it only in Australia the case?
The principle that uncast votes at shareholder meetings remain unconsidered generally applies to publicly traded companies worldwide. However, there are some differences in the specific regulations and procedures depending on the country and legal framework:

Quorum: The requirements for a quorum can vary by country. In some countries, the quorum may be relatively low, while in others, it may be higher.

Proxy Voting: The options for casting a vote by proxy or mail can vary. Some countries have very strict rules for proxy voting, while others have more flexible procedures.

Majority Requirements: The specific majority requirements for different types of resolutions (e.g., simple majority, qualified majority) can differ.

Minority Protection: Some countries have special protections for minority shareholders to ensure their interests are considered despite low participation rates.

Despite these differences, the fundamental principle remains: if a shareholder does not vote, their vote is not considered, which can influence the outcome of the votes.

My apologies you must vote to be counted

 

[Space Cadet]

My understanding of constitution law and voting at meetings is, if you don’t vote it will be recognised as abstained ie no vote for or against and not counted in either category. You might note in most notices after a meeting ( results of meeting) there are three categories - for, against and abstain. My opinion only.

You can also mark it to put the chairperson as your proxy, in which the chairperson will vote for you at his discretion, I believe.

SC

 

[Kachoo]

Hi Wags I just had a look on linkedIn
here is a screen shot. It certainly says to present.
View attachment 62970

May I also point out there is that Wavious Job everyone was hunting down he was a strategic advisor AKA consultant likely.

 

[Wags]

This also looks very interesting.
Liked by Anil.

Have a read at their website

AONDevices, Inc. on LinkedIn: #tinyml #tinyml

✨ We’re excited to announce that our groundbreaking Always-on Voice, Sound and Sensor Fusion Edge AI Solution, consisting of our AON1120™ Chip…

www.linkedin.com

More interesting.
Aondevices are partner with Dialog semiconductors which was acquired be Renesas in Aug 2021, and uses 2 nodes on the chip?

Renesas Completes Acquisition of Dialog SemiconductorRenesas Electronicshttps://www.renesas.com › about › press-room › renesas-...

well well well
Prior to founding AON, El Khatib was a lead engineer working on voice, audio and hardware DSP SoCs at Connexant and Qualcomm, in addition to a brief stint at Brainchip. Her hands-on experience taught her the constraints, limitations and booby traps of AI at the edge.

Another advantage of AONDevices’ solution is user privacy; the chip does not require a connection to the cloud to operate

As Mouna explains, the key differentiator here is the super-low power consumption, less than 260 µW for a 12-voice-command recognition workload, as an example. This makes AONDevices’ solution extremely competitive against alternative chipsets from manufacturers like Syntiant,


edit: Maybe not so interesting after all, apparently "Tain't what you do - it's the way that you do it!"

 

[HopalongPetrovski]

Ok, I'm still somewhat confused but to play it safe will, and encourage you all, to vote as you see fit.

I will be voting the Company line, which is yes to everything except the spill motion, by which I agree with the sentiment put here by others, that it is potentially too damaging and at the least distracting, at this time.

I want them all concentrating on nailing down contracts and generating revenue rather than being concerned about their positions and left feeling unsupported by their share base.

Frankly, I want them working hard making us all rich, rather than have them caught up in some manipulators scheme to get our shares cheaper.

 

[DingoBorat]

There's a lot of confusion over the voting..

It's easy to do online and takes less than 2 minutes.

But if you want to leave this important vote to chance and hope the, he said/she said rhetoric is correct.

Just sit on your hands and hope for the best!

 

[miaeffect]

Waaaat the heck?

Unigen and Ai Labs Inc. Join Forces to Provide Innovative Solutions - Unigen

Unigen Corporation, a global leader in the design and manufacturing of enterprise and industrial electronics, and Ai Labs Inc., a pioneer in artificial intelligence and data analytics, today announced that they have entered an agreement to deliver innovative solutions by leveraging Unigen’s...

unigen.com

 

[Wags]

Waaaat the heck?

Unigen and Ai Labs Inc. Join Forces to Provide Innovative Solutions - Unigen

Unigen Corporation, a global leader in the design and manufacturing of enterprise and industrial electronics, and Ai Labs Inc., a pioneer in artificial intelligence and data analytics, today announced that they have entered an agreement to deliver innovative solutions by leveraging Unigen’s...

unigen.com

View attachment 62978

They have us as a Technology partner on their website

Partners

 

[buena suerte :-)]

They have us as a Technology partner on their website

Partners

Very nice

 

[Rach2512]

They have us as a Technology partner on their website

Partners

BrainChip Partners with AI Labs on Next-Generation Application Development

BrainChip collaborates with AI Labs to drive next-generation application development, leveraging the power of artificial intelligence.

brainchip.com

 

[DingoBorat]

There's a lot of confusion over the voting..

It's easy to do online and takes less than 2 minutes.

But if you want to leave this important vote to chance and hope the, he said/she said rhetoric is correct.

Just sit on your hands and hope for the best!

Don't underestimate the Power of your vote either.

You may have what you consider a small holding, but 10s of thousands of small holdings, can make a big difference.

One chopstick is easily broken, but hundreds are extremely difficult, to impossible..

There are some Big Logs out there (mutiple analogies) like Citicorp and we have no idea of those assholes intentions.

 

[Tony Coles]

Hi.
Certainly don't want to create any confusion here but it is my understanding that if we do not vote, our votes can and will be used and allocated to the chairman of the meeting to vote the Company line and so will effectively result in a yes vote for all the company recommendations and a no vote to spill, which is how I will be voting anyway.

Is this correct?

I just voted all for except for the spill, last one, against. Taken me 5 minutes for 3 members of family, so easy online.