I’m sick of your trolling.The old "oohhh look who liked our post!". Give it a break mate. These kind of posts are just beyond silly. Baseless speculation at its best
I’m sick of your trolling.The old "oohhh look who liked our post!". Give it a break mate. These kind of posts are just beyond silly. Baseless speculation at its best
Gacy has really lost the plot now
Or was it possibly Jens Egholm Pedersen, the Danish doctoral student at Stockholm’s KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden’s largest technical university, who hosted said presentation by Cristian Axenie on the Open Neuromorphic YouTube channel and appeared to be genuinely impressed about Akida (and the Edge Impulse platform), too?
Where is
View attachment 61646
For the sake of completeness, usually one of Frangipanni's fortes, my post in full added:Hi Bravo,
this is what Mohsen Kaboli, Assistant Professor for Robotics and Tactile Intelligence as well as Lead and Principal Investigator of Embodied AI, Robotics, Cognitive Vehicle & Tactile Intelligence at BMW Group commented on Mercedes Chief Software Officer Magnus Östberg’s recent LinkedIn post about neuromorphic computing:
View attachment 61544
View attachment 61546
View attachment 61547
View attachment 61548
View attachment 61549 View attachment 61550
In February 2023, you had already come across PHASTRAC and asked Diogenese for his opinion:
Here is a recent article on the BMW project Mohsen Kaboli is currently working on: “He is developing a cognitive seat that could appear in BMW vehicles in just a few years.”
https://www.bmw.com/de/freude/wie-sich-die-zukunft-bei-bmw-anfuehlt.html (Deutsch)
https://www.bmw.com/en/freude/a-touch-of-the-future-with-bmw.html (English)
View attachment 61553
View attachment 61554
View attachment 61556
Puh-leeze!
Why did you have to dig out this misleading comparison once again, although I had already fact-checked it months ago? Well, here we go again:
In the “technical comparison” image you re-posted, Akida gets compared to Dynap-SEL, SynSense’s 2018 neuromorphic chip featuring “1k analog low-power spiking neurons and up to 80k configurable synaptic connections, including 8k synapses with integrated spike-based learning rules.”
Low-Power Neuromorphic Chip DYNAP™-SEL | SynSense
Our next-generation neuromorphic chip, Powering Innovation with 1k Analog Neurons and 80k Configurable Synapses, Including Integrated Spike-Based Learning!www.synsense.ai
You are evidently aware, though, that BMW are experimenting with SynSense’s fully event-driven neuromorphic vision SoC Speck for their smart cockpit occupant monitoring R&D. So why are you not comparing Akida to Speck instead, as you ought to (although I am not sure whether a direct comparison between AKD1000 and a smart vision processing SoC combining a dynamic vision sensor (DVS) and a neuromorphic processor, actually makes sense?)
View attachment 61625
View attachment 61626
And to be fair, you should also factor in Speck’s competitive price tag at < 7 $ (presumably USD) that could easily tip the scales in SynSense’s favour, when potential customers who don’t mind doing business with a de facto-Chinese company consider Speck’s technical specifications “good enough“ for their envisaged use cases, even though AKD1000 boasts more than three times as many neurons as Speck (but not more than 1000x as many, as your comparison seems to suggest). They may not see the point in paying more for a product that could be described as “over-engineered” for their narrow use cases.
IMO, you are doing BrainChip no favour by cherry-picking a competitor’s far less capable neuromorphic mixed-signal chip for your apples and oranges-comparison. By doing so, you are totally exaggerating the parameter divide between Akida and the competition’s more advanced neuromorphic offerings, eg in SynSense’s case, the fully digital neuromorphic processor Dynap-CNN:
DYNAP™-CNN: Neuromorphic Processor With 1M Spiking eurons
DYNAP™-CNN is world's first fully scalable, event-driven neuromorphic processor with 1M configurable spiking neurons and direct interface with external DVS.www.synsense.ai
View attachment 61627
What’s the point of unfairly disparaging the competition?
While we shareholders may wish for BrainChip to literally make EVERY sensor smart one day, the commercial reality will be that we will never gain 100% of the global market share. Regardless of any technological superiority.
I do hope that your post is meant to be ‘tongue in cheek’…Puh-leeze!
Why did you have to dig out this misleading comparison once again, although I had already fact-checked it months ago? Well, here we go again:
In the “technical comparison” image you re-posted, Akida gets compared to Dynap-SEL, SynSense’s 2018 neuromorphic chip featuring “1k analog low-power spiking neurons and up to 80k configurable synaptic connections, including 8k synapses with integrated spike-based learning rules.”
Low-Power Neuromorphic Chip DYNAP™-SEL | SynSense
Our next-generation neuromorphic chip, Powering Innovation with 1k Analog Neurons and 80k Configurable Synapses, Including Integrated Spike-Based Learning!www.synsense.ai
You are evidently aware, though, that BMW are experimenting with SynSense’s fully event-driven neuromorphic vision SoC Speck for their smart cockpit occupant monitoring R&D. So why are you not comparing Akida to Speck instead, as you ought to (although I am not sure whether a direct comparison between AKD1000 and a smart vision processing SoC combining a dynamic vision sensor (DVS) and a neuromorphic processor, actually makes sense?)
View attachment 61625
View attachment 61626
And to be fair, you should also factor in Speck’s competitive price tag at < 7 $ (presumably USD) that could easily tip the scales in SynSense’s favour, when potential customers who don’t mind doing business with a de facto-Chinese company consider Speck’s technical specifications “good enough“ for their envisaged use cases, even though AKD1000 boasts more than three times as many neurons as Speck (but not more than 1000x as many, as your comparison seems to suggest). They may not see the point in paying more for a product that could be described as “over-engineered” for their narrow use cases.
IMO, you are doing BrainChip no favour by cherry-picking a competitor’s far less capable neuromorphic mixed-signal chip for your apples and oranges-comparison. By doing so, you are totally exaggerating the parameter divide between Akida and the competition’s more advanced neuromorphic offerings, eg in SynSense’s case, the fully digital neuromorphic processor Dynap-CNN:
DYNAP™-CNN: Neuromorphic Processor With 1M Spiking eurons
DYNAP™-CNN is world's first fully scalable, event-driven neuromorphic processor with 1M configurable spiking neurons and direct interface with external DVS.www.synsense.ai
View attachment 61627
What’s the point of unfairly disparaging the competition?
While we shareholders may wish for BrainChip to literally make EVERY sensor smart one day, the commercial reality will be that we will never gain 100% of the global market share. Regardless of any technological superiority.
Yeah sure, blah blahHim and DH can only appear when the SP is sub 25 cents.
They've left the braincell in good hands for now (Iseki and Dk)
Shame about the trolling. I would rather this forum be silent for a few hours, between interesting titbits, than fill it with pretend "LTH discussion"
Yeah sure, blah blah
The SP has imploded under the current board, from > $1.30 to 30c in the past few years with not an agreement to show for these years of effort by the staff. A new commercialization board will bring relief, rather than disruption. It is how we support our staff and the founders. Faith based investors, where the faith is based on the personalities of the board, are destroying the company's future because they hardly understand our product.
If Stevens hadn't been given the flick our faith based shareholders would be singing his praises, popsting images of him and the lion and tiger.
Just as Stevens was given his marching orders, if there is no announcement or $2Mill revenue, it is now our chance to stand up and do what's right.
We have the science behind us. The science doesn't rely on personalities. Now stand up and be counted.
That's the whole point of being flexible, Iseki."It's like owning a goldmine, where people pay you to mine there and then pay you royalties, with zero capital expenditure, or mining risks."
Well said DB, point well made. The analogy of the goldmine is worth exploring.
What actually happens is that the gold is pre-sold through an off-take arrangement, then that money pays for the mining.
So with us it might be: license the IP, with money down, and we'll guarantee delivery of chips in 6 months. This is much more than we are offering.
The simple fact is that if no-one is signing IP license agreements, then let's invent a few more options for them. It's great that we say we're being flexible, but are we?
Whom do you have in mind for the new commercialization board?Yeah sure, blah blah
The SP has imploded under the current board, from > $1.30 to 30c in the past few years with not an agreement to show for these years of effort by the staff. A new commercialization board will bring relief, rather than disruption. It is how we support our staff and the founders. Faith based investors, where the faith is based on the personalities of the board, are destroying the company's future because they hardly understand our product.
If Stevens hadn't been given the flick our faith based shareholders would be singing his praises, popsting images of him and the lion and tiger.
Just as Stevens was given his marching orders, if there is no announcement or $2Mill revenue, it is now our chance to stand up and do what's right.
We have the science behind us. The science doesn't rely on personalities. Now stand up and be counted.
Hey Damo..2022,Him and DH can only appear when the SP is sub 25 cents.
They've left the braincell in good hands for now (Iseki and Dk)
Shame about the trolling. I would rather this forum be silent for a few hours, between interesting titbits, than fill it with pretend "LTH discussion"
If you say that with such confidence then you should know exactly how many they had in stock, otherwise your just guessing at best.There weren't many to start with. They were just for demos. So doubt they will bring much money for revenue lol
Nice selfie Willy 123.This is a woefully lazy effort, even for you Gacy.
Here we see Gazy pumping the following:
Gacy doesn't say "why", coz that would be too much effort for lazy Gacy and not suit their lazy agenda.
- Decline in share price
- Criticism of the current board
- Distrust in faith-based investors
- Advocacy for change following leadership turnover
- Urgency for financial results
Keep Praying Buddy
View attachment 61669
LinkedIn Login, Sign in | LinkedIn
Login to LinkedIn to keep in touch with people you know, share ideas, and build your career.www.linkedin.com
View attachment 61631
Another really nice and memorable image, but what has the Akida Edge AI Box got to do with “leading engineering innovation in the automotive sector”?