Stable Genius
Regular
Hi again Euks,
I understand your point of view that having everyone know who is using Brainchip would be advertising and bring in more customers.
Conversely it would be removing any leading technological advantage any company working with us would have and potentially damage their revenue which would in turn reduce ours.
Your example: Coke. I’d more than happily remain an unknown silent partner with coke if every quarter I recieved royalties for their sales.
Half a dozen companies like Coke would be sufficient to build massive revenue.
Luckily we already have NASA, US Defence, Ford, Renasas, Nanose, Megachips, SiFive, Merecedes and highly likely Valeo.
Once those known names alone begin full scale production Brainchip will be very very successful.
As more of the EAPs, e.g. TATA, CISCO, Stellantis, Continental etc and many other known or unknowns begin production the money pot will grow.
As more products are released other companies will see the potential of neruomorphic AI, look for the leaders in the revolutionary field and sign up.
I imagine it will be like a rolling snow ball down a giant hill and we are only just about to release the snow ball: commercialisation has only just begun. Unfortunately it will take time by way of months and years but in my opinion it is more likely than unlikely at this stage of where we are at.
Again my opinion: but we are very far ahead in this race: imagine the alternative, we didn’t have EAP; the chip wasn’t a success and we were still at the drawing board or workshop! Or didn’t have the patents. That would be far worse!
Peace
FF
).
