Xhosa12345
Regular
Get a boat with a treadmill on it and go around the globe a few times Bravo.... you buy the boat and ill shout you the treadmill.....
BRN Discussion Ongoing
- Thread starter TechGirl
- Start date
Get a boat with a treadmill on it and go around the globe a few times Bravo.... you buy the boat and ill shout you the treadmill.....
cosors
👀
Chippers ,
Here is one i prepared earlier.
BRAINCHIP HOLDINGS LTD
ASX : BRN Share : Incorporated in everything electronic.
$0.3725
Today's Change
UP $0.1125 ( Up Shiploads )
* Eveningstar ( Random number generator )
13th Feb 2024
UNDERVALUED
FAIR VALUE $5.21
FIVE STAR RATING
Regards ,
Esq.
Tradingview
Fact Finder
Top 20
Two little things:
ONE:
TWO:
GAPS AS SCIENCE:
When I went to school the teacher said this is your Times Tables. If you need to know what 5 times 5 is having learnt these tables you will know instantly the answer is 25. You will not have to work it out or check it is correct every time.
In science the teacher said this is how you work out the velocity of an object. If you use this formula you will get the correct answer every time.
I soon came to understand that this is how scientific and mathematical theory works. No matter how many times you use the formula you get the same answer. Until this is shown to be the case and peer reviewed and proven repeatable a theorem is not considered proved.
Then we go to GAPS. No matter what you read regarding the dark art you will discover that even the practitioners of this subject called charting agree that GAPS are not always closed and they are closed on their own estimates which are not peer reviewed only 80 to 90 percent of the time.
Five times five is always twenty five not just 80 to 90 percent of the time. GAPS are unscientific mumbo jumbo.
Scientific theory works every time and takes account of all the variables. This morning at a bit after 7am three hours before opening there was a trade for 500,000 shares at a price higher than closing. This event added a variable not accounted for in the myth about closing and opening prices. In addition Brainchip traded overnight on the German exchanges and in the USA at various prices.
Those who are claiming a GAP between the closing and opening price on the ASX alone do so in complete isolation of these known and provable facts.
GAPS are filled for no other reason than the price of a share does not always go up in a straight line never stopping to draw breath. Shares go up and shares go down in price and in so doing appear to be closing GAPs on the way through.
Most vocal about GAPS by modus operandi on HC strangely also appear to be the most manipulative of traders.
My opinion only DYOR
Fact Finder
ONE:
TWO:
GAPS AS SCIENCE:
When I went to school the teacher said this is your Times Tables. If you need to know what 5 times 5 is having learnt these tables you will know instantly the answer is 25. You will not have to work it out or check it is correct every time.
In science the teacher said this is how you work out the velocity of an object. If you use this formula you will get the correct answer every time.
I soon came to understand that this is how scientific and mathematical theory works. No matter how many times you use the formula you get the same answer. Until this is shown to be the case and peer reviewed and proven repeatable a theorem is not considered proved.
Then we go to GAPS. No matter what you read regarding the dark art you will discover that even the practitioners of this subject called charting agree that GAPS are not always closed and they are closed on their own estimates which are not peer reviewed only 80 to 90 percent of the time.
Five times five is always twenty five not just 80 to 90 percent of the time. GAPS are unscientific mumbo jumbo.
Scientific theory works every time and takes account of all the variables. This morning at a bit after 7am three hours before opening there was a trade for 500,000 shares at a price higher than closing. This event added a variable not accounted for in the myth about closing and opening prices. In addition Brainchip traded overnight on the German exchanges and in the USA at various prices.
Those who are claiming a GAP between the closing and opening price on the ASX alone do so in complete isolation of these known and provable facts.
GAPS are filled for no other reason than the price of a share does not always go up in a straight line never stopping to draw breath. Shares go up and shares go down in price and in so doing appear to be closing GAPs on the way through.
Most vocal about GAPS by modus operandi on HC strangely also appear to be the most manipulative of traders.
My opinion only DYOR
Fact Finder
Townyj
Ermahgerd
DingoBorat
Slim
Maybe this is helping them avoid burning, for the time being?...
They gotta be getting hot under the collar...
Humble Genius
Regular
Nah, we closed that gap about 2 years ago!
Humble Genius
Regular
DingoBorat
Slim
So what "has" happened to David Holland?
Did he sell out for a 10% gain a couple of days ago??..
He seemed like such a rusted on holder, so surely not...
I don't suppose anyone, but Wilzy cares..
Did he sell out for a 10% gain a couple of days ago??..
He seemed like such a rusted on holder, so surely not...
I don't suppose anyone, but Wilzy cares..
Fact Finder
Top 20
That is so funny. LOL
FF
This is what i wanted to read
Maybe he is waiting for the next ATH to buy in. And after it drops 10cent, he will start again and play tom&jerry with himself
HarryCool1
Regular
What time is the explosion today Esqy? 2:24 or 2:34 like yesterday?Chippers ,
Here is one i prepared earlier.
BRAINCHIP HOLDINGS LTD
ASX : BRN Share : Incorporated in everything electronic.
$0.3725
Today's Change
UP $0.1125 ( Up Shiploads )
* Eveningstar ( Random number generator )
13th Feb 2024
UNDERVALUED
FAIR VALUE $5.21
FIVE STAR RATING
Regards ,
Esq.
Fact Finder
Top 20
Hi All
I know you are all hanging out for some more science so I have been digging around. The following paper does not refer to AKIDA technology and is using a Loihi type Leaky SNN but this makes no difference because AKIDA is more versatile and efficient so I would ask you to consider this when discussing valuations "What would a state of the art secure ID system for mobile phones be worth":
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10380750/
IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2024
Sensor-based continuous authentication mechanisms have demonstrated promising capabilities in enhancing the security of smart devices. In this paper, we present SNNAuth, a novel sensor-based continuous Authentication system on smartphones that utilizes Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs), leveraging biometric behavioral patterns captured by smartphone sensors. To enhance discriminative feature extraction, we introduce positional encoding into the time slicing of normalized sensor data. We design the ANN-SNN model, which transforms the trained artificial neural network (ANN) into an SNN by converting weights and activations into suitable spike neuron models and synaptic connections. The ANN-SNN model, designed for efficient computation and increased the robustness, is specifically trained to extract temporal features of a legitimate user. With the extracted features of a legitimate user, we then train the one-class k-Nearest Neighbors, which is employed for conducting the classification for all users. Based on the trained ANN-SNN and one-class kNN, ANNAuth determines whether the current user is legitimate or an imposter. Finally, we evaluate the performance of ANNAuth on two public datasets and our dataset, and the experimental results demonstrate that ANNAuth outperforms state-of-the-art solutions by achieving the highest accuracy and the lowest equal error rates (EERs) on all three datasets”
Todd Vierra demonstrates this biometric ability using infra red in his CES 2024 interview and unless my memory is faulty does not exclude AKIDA being able to do this with other vision systems such as Prophesee's neuromorphic sensor.
I should mention that while the paper discusses using Leaky SNN a number of the reference paper authors they cite lead back to AKIDA.
My opinion only DYOR
Fact Finder
I know you are all hanging out for some more science so I have been digging around. The following paper does not refer to AKIDA technology and is using a Loihi type Leaky SNN but this makes no difference because AKIDA is more versatile and efficient so I would ask you to consider this when discussing valuations "What would a state of the art secure ID system for mobile phones be worth":
“SNNAuth: Sensor-Based Continuous Authentication On Smartphones Using Spiking Neural Networks
Yantao Li, Xinyu Sun, Zhenyu Yang, Hongyu HuangIEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2024
Sensor-based continuous authentication mechanisms have demonstrated promising capabilities in enhancing the security of smart devices. In this paper, we present SNNAuth, a novel sensor-based continuous Authentication system on smartphones that utilizes Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs), leveraging biometric behavioral patterns captured by smartphone sensors. To enhance discriminative feature extraction, we introduce positional encoding into the time slicing of normalized sensor data. We design the ANN-SNN model, which transforms the trained artificial neural network (ANN) into an SNN by converting weights and activations into suitable spike neuron models and synaptic connections. The ANN-SNN model, designed for efficient computation and increased the robustness, is specifically trained to extract temporal features of a legitimate user. With the extracted features of a legitimate user, we then train the one-class k-Nearest Neighbors, which is employed for conducting the classification for all users. Based on the trained ANN-SNN and one-class kNN, ANNAuth determines whether the current user is legitimate or an imposter. Finally, we evaluate the performance of ANNAuth on two public datasets and our dataset, and the experimental results demonstrate that ANNAuth outperforms state-of-the-art solutions by achieving the highest accuracy and the lowest equal error rates (EERs) on all three datasets”
Todd Vierra demonstrates this biometric ability using infra red in his CES 2024 interview and unless my memory is faulty does not exclude AKIDA being able to do this with other vision systems such as Prophesee's neuromorphic sensor.
I should mention that while the paper discusses using Leaky SNN a number of the reference paper authors they cite lead back to AKIDA.
My opinion only DYOR
Fact Finder
buena suerte :-)
BOB Bank of Brainchip
Here it is 
ASX query
ASX query
toasty
Regular
The speeding ticket and the response - both as expected!!
DingoBorat
Slim
I "believe" this is what happens, when we get a "taste" of investor interest, outside of the sweet little old, backwater ASX..
I hope the "entities" shorting BRN stock have taken Worldwide interest in this Company, in the Future, into consideration...
I hope the "entities" shorting BRN stock have taken Worldwide interest in this Company, in the Future, into consideration...
Last edited:
Similar threads
