BRN Discussion Ongoing
- Thread starter TechGirl
- Start date
Damo4
Regular
Just as well - the moths ate my woollen cozzies.
Mea culpa
prəmɪskjuəs
Can bring goggles and snorkel along with a box of Brown Brothers Prosecco and a carton of Red Duck Pale Ale.
I note, no togs allowed. Fine. At 69 I used to wear speedos, at 72 I don’t bother.
HopalongPetrovski
I'm Spartacus!
I wouldn't be setting foot in there Miss Bravo without my togs!
Particularly not if there's a rogue sausage on the loose!
Not with all that hot bubbling water and the possibility of it clogging a jet and being propelled at speed in an unfortunate fashion.
Could have dire consequences and I sure don't wanna be walking funny at the AGM.
Not with all those big swingin' D's that are coming to shake up the board and tell Seany Baby how he should be running our company.
Vladsblood
Regular
G'day mrgds mate Spell check is a real blast LOL We need Akida everywhere LOL Vlad
FabricatedLunacy
Regular
Micklepickle: Unsubstantiated meme stock goes 10%. Based on zero sales and no market impact. Here’s what you should buy, once you pay us to see it.
HopalongPetrovski
I'm Spartacus!
Yeah, seems thats where the manips have set the upper range for today.
49 marks a nice higher high after the recent double bounce off the low at .405.
HopalongPetrovski
I'm Spartacus!
Right about now would be a delicious time for some news to drop......Good Afternoon Boab,
I'd be thinking that's about to be wiped shortly.
.
Regards,
Esq.
I know absolutely nuthin', but just sayin'..........
. 
MDhere
Regular
will be interesting to see if that sell @49c 515000 get chomped up today or disappears...
FabricatedLunacy
Regular
Fitting song title, for what’s hopefully to come for those holding… also Judith is as underrated as BRN 
equanimous
Norse clairvoyant shapeshifter goddess
17 red flags = I need to close my shorts, dip it more
GDJR69
Regular
I've had an interesting email exchange with Ken Scarince that I thought you might be interested in. I sent an email to the company as follows and had the following response:
The questions I asked in my email were:
'1. Why are Renesas not mentioned on the Partner page? Do we still have an IP Licence agreement with Renesas?
2. The partnerships: Is there a written partnership agreement with each of the partners? If not, how do we protect our IP and profit from the partnerships once products are developed?'
The Response from Ken Scarince was:
'Thanks for your note. I received your investor relations inquiry from our sales team.
We do indeed have an active IP agreement with Renesas. They are not considered an ecosystem partner, rather they are considered a customer. We define partners as companies or institutions with whom we collaborate on designs or applications using our combined technologies as opposed to a customer where we simply license our IP to them and they incorporate into their products for sale. And yes, we do have a written partnership agreement with each partner that very clearly defines who owns what to prevent any IP “pollution”. Typically, there is little risk of IP issues arising as the goal is to create something that requires a customer to purchase or license the core products from each partner. In some cases, the partners simply use our products to demonstrate the capabilities of their products when combined with Akida. But in any case, it goes through a thorough legal review process'
This means that we have a partnership agreement with each partner and that the goal is to develop products to on sell to their customers. As I suggested in an earlier post, this seems to be consistent with my view that the partnerships were really a way of getting companies on board quickly with Akida without the up front cost of an IP Licence. It also means that when the joint products are produced, they potentially have a ready customer base with our partner's customers. I think this puts in context the commercial purpose of the partnerships and makes you realise just how significant they are. It also means that we have products being developed by multiple partners now. Imagine what is going to happen when all the partners are ready to sell the products to their customers. It makes you start to think that in due course all these partnerships are potentially much more commercially significant than they might at first appear. (I don't wish to reopen the debate about whether they should have been announced on the ASX - no one will care about that when all the products are being sold in the market and the $$$ are rolling in)
The questions I asked in my email were:
'1. Why are Renesas not mentioned on the Partner page? Do we still have an IP Licence agreement with Renesas?
2. The partnerships: Is there a written partnership agreement with each of the partners? If not, how do we protect our IP and profit from the partnerships once products are developed?'
The Response from Ken Scarince was:
'Thanks for your note. I received your investor relations inquiry from our sales team.
We do indeed have an active IP agreement with Renesas. They are not considered an ecosystem partner, rather they are considered a customer. We define partners as companies or institutions with whom we collaborate on designs or applications using our combined technologies as opposed to a customer where we simply license our IP to them and they incorporate into their products for sale. And yes, we do have a written partnership agreement with each partner that very clearly defines who owns what to prevent any IP “pollution”. Typically, there is little risk of IP issues arising as the goal is to create something that requires a customer to purchase or license the core products from each partner. In some cases, the partners simply use our products to demonstrate the capabilities of their products when combined with Akida. But in any case, it goes through a thorough legal review process'
This means that we have a partnership agreement with each partner and that the goal is to develop products to on sell to their customers. As I suggested in an earlier post, this seems to be consistent with my view that the partnerships were really a way of getting companies on board quickly with Akida without the up front cost of an IP Licence. It also means that when the joint products are produced, they potentially have a ready customer base with our partner's customers. I think this puts in context the commercial purpose of the partnerships and makes you realise just how significant they are. It also means that we have products being developed by multiple partners now. Imagine what is going to happen when all the partners are ready to sell the products to their customers. It makes you start to think that in due course all these partnerships are potentially much more commercially significant than they might at first appear. (I don't wish to reopen the debate about whether they should have been announced on the ASX - no one will care about that when all the products are being sold in the market and the $$$ are rolling in)
Similar threads
