Wow! If Evgeni likes it, then I loooovvvveee it!
View attachment 36542
View attachment 36540
View attachment 36539
Wow! If Evgeni likes it, then I loooovvvveee it!
View attachment 36542
View attachment 36540
View attachment 36539
If BRN ever puts me into a position to follow my music making dream, then i will officially make my stage name DJ Brainchip HoldingsView attachment 36553
Atleast someone thinks its a newsworthy item worthy- Dow Jones news wires
If BRN ever puts me into a position to follow my music making dream, then i will officially make my stage name DJ Brainchip Holdings
How about DJ NDA ?You might have to contend with legal issues related to copyright.
May I suggest alternate associated names like DJ Aikido / DJ Alida instead?
How about DJ NDA ?
And then refuse to discuss its meaning.
That'll keep 'em guessing.
Traditional chip-makers ARM, Intel, Qualcomm are experiencing unprecedent competitive pressures from new entrants (SiFive) and their own major customers (Apple, Amazon) moving into chip making.The wheels of commerce grind slow ...
A number of the partnerships have been described in terms of co-developments (year of engagement):
Edge Impulse (2020)
nViso (2022)
Prophesee ((2022)
SiFive (2022)
Socionext (2020) ("It's complicated" (SynQuacer))
Valeo (2020).
Apart from Valeo and Socionext, most of these are early stage companies with leading edge products at the frontier of their industry.
Some of the co-developments may result in licences, and some may be in the form of Joint Developments which involve profit-sharing rather than licence fees.
Then we have relationships with chip makers and foundries:
Global Foundries (2023)
IFS (2023)
MegaChips (licencee) (2021)
Renesas (licencee) (2019)
TSMC (via Socionext), (2020)
to which we could add our ARM (2022) IP licensing business ecosystem partner making Akida IP available to its customers.
Any commercial outcomes from these relationships should produce licence fees. Both ARM and Intel are experiencing elevated levels of competition
Then there are some US government contractors (SBIR):
Intellisense (NASA) (2023)
Quantum Ventura (DoE) (2023)
Vorago (NASA) (20)
ISL (AFRL) (2022)
There is a new urgency in the US government's attitude to procurement of leading edge technology.
Medical:
Biotome
NaNose (?)
Any progress on this front will be dependent on the sensing technology being proven and obtaining government approval.
Akida can also detect irregularities in X-rays and also handle the output of medical sensors.
Many companies which develop medical sensors may be startups which would need JDs rather than licences.
Other possibilities include:
Boeing/USAF (Loyal Wingman)
Ford
Magik eye
Mercedes
MosChips
Samsung (smart fridge)
SoundHound (Mercedes)
TCS (robotics+)
Unity Tech (Mercedes)
Some would add Qualcomm to this list (but I wouldn't (at the moment)).
Small start-ups would be unlikely to be able to afford licence fees and development costs, so would probably want JD.
These lists are certainly incomplete, so additional information will be gratefully received.
Haha yeah man, although I was kinda just making light of how I read the first line in the quote I was referring to - but DJ Alida will sufficeYou might have to contend with legal issues related to copyright.
May I suggest alternate associated royalty-free names like DJ Aikido / DJ Alida instead?
I assume partnership means both the companies can work together so that a reasonable solution can be provided to a customer.Great news.
Could this little investment below, be now paying dividends for us?
BrainChip Acquires License to Cybersecurity Technology
BrainChip Acquires Cybersecurity Technology Licensebrainchip.com
No mention of Brainchip in Megachips annual report
Was mentioned in the previous 2 quarterly updates, but interestingly no mention this time, unless i missed something.
Thanks Esq,Good Afternoon Diogenese,
Cracking effort as per usual.
Below is my little list, hope it can add to the collective.
Cheers once again.
Regards,
Esq.
Hi Rob.
My point is that looking back mistakes may have been made, the absolute pristine path of growth may have been missed and that it stinks that our share price is lower at the moment than its all time highs. As a fellow share holder these are all points of concern.
However, I choose to focus my attention on what Sean and the Company are doing now to try and address these issues.
They have some baggage to clear from the past, and, as ugly as it may appear, I would like them to be rid of it so they can focus on lessons learnt, and get on with it.
Some may think Sean has had his chance and did not cut the mustard, but I think he deserves more time to get the Company traction and I'm yet to hear an alternate plan of action moving forward, beyond "off with his head".
I think we need to back in our management, acknowledging they are but merely human, and thus liable to error, and having hopefully learned from such, support their ongoing efforts on our behalf in moving forward and progressing the Company and its aims, which will eventually be reflected in our share price.
If your team fumbles and stumbles calling them names may bring a brief moment of self gratification but it's ultimately not conducive to the result desired. That, in a nutshell is my point.
But they still need to be accountable and address the valid concerns of Shareholders. Our money is paying their salaries and bonuses. To continue in this secretive (NDA bubble) whilst not putting ASX announcements out (price sensitive or not) simply can't continue. Particularly when the SP has retraced by around 75% and the latest 4C had an insignificant revenue figure. The lack of transparency here and inability to navigate the ASX reporting rules is particularly unprofessional for a listed company. By their actions our management are enabling the shorters to decimate the value of our holdings.
These NDA's had better lead to revenue soon, otherwise using them as a reason for suppressing the flow of information to shareholders may be seen as a deceitful tactic.
So we have around 30,000 plus everyday investors, how many off these keep in touch with social media? maybe 10 or 20% max, which means only 6000 share holders would have been privy to news being released by brainchip via social media over the last year or so. So if you were a new investor and wanted to invest in brainchip and decide to check out the asx announcements it wouldn’t really excite you to invest, when really with all the news over the last year it should be the complete opposite.
News like today should be released via the asx and who ever decision it is not to release this information, is not only causing a negative effect on the sp, it’s also making enemies of us share holders. This needs to stop now before I find out who it is and kick them in theSurely going to the website of the company you are thinking of investing is not unreasonable.
Makes me wonder why I bother sharing the tweet of the partnership in the first place.
Quick list of guaranteed things
- Death
- Taxes
- Complaints and negativity when BRN announce anything on any platform outside of the ASX
So we have around 30,000 plus everyday investors, how many off these keep in touch with social media? maybe 10 or 20% max, which means only 6000 share holders would have been privy to news being released by brainchip via social media over the last year or so. So if you were a new investor and wanted to invest in brainchip and decide to check out the asx announcements it wouldn’t really excite you to invest, when really with all the news over the last year it should be the complete opposite.
Come on BRAINCHIP pull your heads in and start releasing more news on the asx.