BadKittyKiki
Member
Ok, understood. Well sorry, not sorry, to anyone invested in Plato, though, because that ill-advised marketing campaign on the part of Dave Allen has surely just gotten them into a world of legal hurt.I said ''passive'' investment too, so in your Super we all could be a part of it if we have invested in index funds etc.
Also, their performance has been steady, so normal for investors to put money on it in these trying times.
All i want to know is who is their legal representation and is that firm publicly listed because I'm going to invest in them with what practically feels like insider knowledge right now as I suspect Plato might end up responsible for a significant revenue boost for that firm over the coming year or so!
Seriously, I'm writing to BRN & WBT and sending them the published content and asking them to have their own legal representation review it, advise the Board and, hopefully, challenge Plato forthwith on the manner in which they've chosen to present this, specifically naming BRN & WBT and yet being vague af on the metrics by which they've assessed them - they've practically alleged corporate fraud, or at least that's how it's certainly coming across. The "Clayton's" type!
If those invested in BRN are not absolutely ropeable about this then I don't even know what to say. This absolutely cannot be left unchallenged.