I really hope you are right...I do get it for a bleeding edge new product. - ie. Akida 1.0
Akida 1.0 they obviously have proven out their tech with partners in a basic form from a performance and smarts perspective. I think some customers have incorporated this into a product - still not fully sure who and when commercial though.
Akida 2.0 and beyond has always been underway and the problem is if you tell customers/potential customers about your runway of products and the "NEW FEATURES COMING" - they will typically say: "We will wait for the new and improved product" and incorporate that IP into our product. Also some want to derisk from any potential issues from a v1.0 product.
I have done the same thing in the past and waited for a second generation model/version to ensure that I get a better version with hopefully no issues. Be it IT product, Car or household whitegoods.
It is great that Akida 2.0 is confirmed to be available this year then there can be no excuses for lack of commercial traction into FY2024 through Akida 1.0 or 2.0. My concern is v2.0 integration, testing and commercialisation time for partners/customers - do we need to wait anothe 3 years for this - I hope not if they have already performed 2 or 3 years testing on v1.0.
I am here for the longer journey but I hope that shows large rewards by FY2025.
What I see is, the Akida 1000 / SoC was the product that we've been waiting on to generate revenues after AI Accelerator/ FPGA... (after moving on from Brainchip Studio)
But the above only landed two IP contracts, my guess is that the above tech was not great enough for the EAPs to adopt / move to a new tech, perhaps they rather settle for inferior tech due to uncertainty, etc.
But that being said, I don't really have any technical background and only know basic terms which I learnt mostly from researching and from this website or HC... my understanding was that this tech is revolutionary and can drive massive change and lead Edge AI field... but lack of annoucements, lack of new IP contracts, revenue, cash inflows and previous failed products along with fked up share price made me question that there are multiple things that doesnt really add up... if we were able to sell 2 IP contracts, how come we weren't able to sell more? Why is there such a big gap between our first one and second one and ... the third one (hopefully soon)... and why is our revenue so small when we are supposed to be paid for providing engineering support to all these EAPs and wtf is sales team doing... or the support engineers doing, why they r paying bonuses, etc...
And pretty much there is no info on the previously announced partnerships... wtf happened to the companies developing new tech utilising brainchip, ford, valeo, nanose, etc. Are they truely actively engaged? If yes why did we only earn 40k (don't try to educate me on revenue vs cash inflows, fk off plz)...
I bought heaps more (from my perspective, although the amount might be much smaller / bigger than some of you here) when I saw royalties from MegaChips, but yea... I am getting more negative n negative...
I don't know if I am being delusional but I truely thought this would've been super massive by now... or at least on clear track... hopefully it is on track behind the scene..